[Bug 53408] New: Dark Souls: Remastered has slow performance with OpenGL renderer
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53408 Bug ID: 53408 Summary: Dark Souls: Remastered has slow performance with OpenGL renderer Product: Wine Version: 7.1 Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: performance, regression Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: d3d Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: andrey.goosev(a)gmail.com CC: hverbeet(a)gmail.com Regression SHA1: 7c844cd3c9c465bdeaf3d98d6da5f2f5e460e650 Distribution: --- Before 0494:trace:fps:wined3d_cs_exec_present 0x103dec0 @ approx 41.94fps After 0494:trace:fps:wined3d_cs_exec_present 0x103dec0 @ approx 12.45fps -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53408 Zeb Figura <z.figura12(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |z.figura12(a)gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Zeb Figura <z.figura12(a)gmail.com> --- What drivers are these? -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53408 --- Comment #2 from Andrey Gusev <andrey.goosev(a)gmail.com> --- NVIDIA Driver 515.57 -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53408 --- Comment #3 from Zeb Figura <z.figura12(a)gmail.com> --- Created attachment 73725 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=73725 remove DRAW_INDIRECT_BUFFER specifically Does the attached diff make a difference? -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53408 --- Comment #4 from Andrey Gusev <andrey.goosev(a)gmail.com> --- No, it's still the same. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53408 --- Comment #5 from Zeb Figura <z.figura12(a)gmail.com> --- How about always returning false from use_buffer_chunk_suballocation()? -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53408 --- Comment #6 from Andrey Gusev <andrey.goosev(a)gmail.com> --- (In reply to Zeb Figura from comment #5)
How about always returning false from use_buffer_chunk_suballocation()?
It's better now. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53408 --- Comment #7 from Zeb Figura <z.figura12(a)gmail.com> --- Created attachment 73860 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=73860 discard on full upload I can reproduce bad performance with an NVidia machine, but unlike you I can't seem to make the performance improve again by always returning false from use_buffer_chunk_suballocation(). HOWEVER, I *can* improve performance with the attached patch. Does it help for you as well? -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53408 --- Comment #8 from Andrey Gusev <andrey.goosev(a)gmail.com> --- (In reply to Zeb Figura from comment #7)
Created attachment 73860 [details] discard on full upload
I can reproduce bad performance with an NVidia machine, but unlike you I can't seem to make the performance improve again by always returning false from use_buffer_chunk_suballocation(). HOWEVER, I *can* improve performance with the attached patch. Does it help for you as well?
Yes. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53408 Zeb Figura <z.figura12(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed by SHA1| |69a730090abe81c5829c6504aac | |373babbe9e8a8 Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #9 from Zeb Figura <z.figura12(a)gmail.com> --- Fixed by <https://source.winehq.org/git/wine.git/commitdiff/69a730090abe81c5829c6504aac373babbe9e8a8>, thanks! -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53408 Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED --- Comment #10 from Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org> --- Closing bugs fixed in 8.0-rc5. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
participants (1)
-
WineHQ Bugzilla