[Bug 50258] New: Missing old windows versions in winecfg
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50258 Bug ID: 50258 Summary: Missing old windows versions in winecfg Product: Wine Version: 6.0-rc1 Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: jeremielapuree(a)yahoo.fr Distribution: Ubuntu Created attachment 68789 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=68789 first windows version available wine wine-6.0-RC1 When creating a new wine 32 bits prefix with winecfg old versions of windows are missing: -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50258 --- Comment #1 from joaopa <jeremielapuree(a)yahoo.fr> --- Created attachment 68790 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=68790 Windows 95 is available with wine-git 727168a9e116a43f851df2673a9169ad280a9ec8 I have not done a regression test yet: I know only that wine-git 727168a9e116a43f851df2673a9169ad280a9ec8 works as expected. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50258 --- Comment #2 from joaopa <jeremielapuree(a)yahoo.fr> --- It looks like that even if WINARCH=win32 is appended, a 64 bit prefix is created. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50258 --- Comment #3 from Gijs Vermeulen <gijsvrm(a)gmail.com> --- (In reply to joaopa from comment #2)
It looks like that even if WINARCH=win32 is appended, a 64 bit prefix is created.
Just to be sure, you meant WINEARCH, right? If so, that would be a bug, otherwise you just misspelled the variable. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50258 --- Comment #4 from Gijs Vermeulen <gijsvrm(a)gmail.com> --- I just checked and for me, in a 64Bit prefix, Windows XP is the oldest version, which is correct. In a 32Bit prefix, the oldest is Windows 2.0, which is also correct. So it seems this bug is INVALID, can you confirm? -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50258 joaopa <jeremielapuree(a)yahoo.fr> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED --- Comment #5 from joaopa <jeremielapuree(a)yahoo.fr> --- You are surely right. Closing as INVALID. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50258 --- Comment #6 from Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> --- Closing. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50258 Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED --- Comment #7 from Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> --- Closing. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
participants (1)
-
WineHQ Bugzilla