[Bug 50156] New: Horrible/grayscale font antialiasing in Wine 5.22
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50156 Bug ID: 50156 Summary: Horrible/grayscale font antialiasing in Wine 5.22 Product: Wine Version: 5.22 Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major Priority: P2 Component: -unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: aros(a)gmx.com Distribution: --- After upgrading from Wine 5.20 which did not antialias standard fonts, I'm now looking at Wine 5.22 and I really don't like what you've done to fonts. Is there a way to * either disable font AA and make it similar to Wine 5.20 * or enable RGB antialiasing? I would take any of these options over what Wine 5.22 offers: grayscale font antialiasing which looks quite ugly. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50156 --- Comment #1 from Artem S. Tashkinov <aros(a)gmx.com> --- Created attachment 68667 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=68667 Wine 5.20 - no font antialiasing for standard GUI fonts -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50156 --- Comment #2 from Artem S. Tashkinov <aros(a)gmx.com> --- Created attachment 68668 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=68668 Wine 5.22 - grayscale font antialiasing for standard GUI fonts -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50156 --- Comment #3 from Artem S. Tashkinov <aros(a)gmx.com> ---
* or enable RGB antialiasing?
I meant subpixel RGB antialiasing which apparently doesn't work. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50156 --- Comment #4 from Artem S. Tashkinov <aros(a)gmx.com> --- My settings are: FontSmoothing=2 FontSmoothingGamma=0 FontSmoothingOrientation=1 FontSmoothingType=2 (1 by default as of Wine 5.22 which doesn't look any better) Also, https://wiki.winehq.org/index.php?search=FontSmoothing https://wiki.winehq.org/index.php?search=FontSmoothingType both return nothing. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50156 --- Comment #5 from Artem S. Tashkinov <aros(a)gmx.com> --- Created attachment 68669 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=68669 Wine 5.22 - with default settings (slightly different grayscale antialiasing) -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50156 --- Comment #6 from Artem S. Tashkinov <aros(a)gmx.com> --- My distro is Fedora 33 with all updates installed, sans Pango which is at version pango-1.43.0-4.fc30.x86_64. And here's my ~/.config/fontconfig/fonts.conf <?xml version='1.0'?> <!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM 'fonts.dtd'> <fontconfig> <!-- Needed for Qt4: http://labs.qt.nokia.com/2008/09/01/subpixel-antialiasing-on-x11/ --> <match target="font"> <edit name="lcdfilter" mode="assign"> <const>lcdlegacy</const> </edit> </match> <match target="font"> <edit name="rgba" mode="assign"> <const>rgb</const> </edit> </match> <dir>~/.fonts</dir> <match target="font"> <edit name="hinting" mode="assign"> <bool>true</bool> </edit> </match> <match target="font"> <edit name="hintstyle" mode="assign"> <const>hintfull</const> </edit> </match> </fontconfig> -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50156 --- Comment #7 from Artem S. Tashkinov <aros(a)gmx.com> --- Lastly I have export FREETYPE_PROPERTIES=truetype:interpreter-version=35 exported system wide. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50156 Artem S. Tashkinov <aros(a)gmx.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|-unknown |gdi32 --- Comment #8 from Artem S. Tashkinov <aros(a)gmx.com> --- I see tons of changes in regard to gdi32 which have led to this regressions. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50156 Artem S. Tashkinov <aros(a)gmx.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Horrible/grayscale font |Horrible/grayscale font |antialiasing in Wine 5.22 |antialiasing in Wine 5.22 / | |FontSmoothing settings are | |ignored --- Comment #9 from Artem S. Tashkinov <aros(a)gmx.com> --- I've set FontSmoothing to 0 - fonts are still antialiased. That's a bug. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50156 --- Comment #10 from Rafał Mużyło <galtgendo(a)o2.pl> --- Among many changes in 5.21, there had been a regression in handling linked fonts. Would you mind testing my patch (195953) that fixed that regression for me ? Given 'standard GUI fonts' likely means 'Tahoma', which is one, it might be relevant. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50156 Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE --- Comment #11 from Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org> --- Most likely duplicate. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 50127 *** -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50156 --- Comment #12 from Artem S. Tashkinov <aros(a)gmx.com> --- (In reply to Rafał Mużyło from comment #10)
Among many changes in 5.21, there had been a regression in handling linked fonts.
Would you mind testing my patch (195953) that fixed that regression for me ? Given 'standard GUI fonts' likely means 'Tahoma', which is one, it might be relevant.
I'm not sure how to fetch patch 195953. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50156 --- Comment #13 from Artem S. Tashkinov <aros(a)gmx.com> --- The patch does nothing. FontSmoothing settings are ignored. Subpixel hinting is not enabled. I'm using TTF fonts by Microsoft while deleting Wine's own TTF fonts. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50156 Artem S. Tashkinov <aros(a)gmx.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |regression -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50156 Alistair Leslie-Hughes <leslie_alistair(a)hotmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED --- Comment #14 from Alistair Leslie-Hughes <leslie_alistair(a)hotmail.com> --- Closing Duplicate. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50156 --- Comment #15 from Rafał Mużyło <galtgendo(a)o2.pl> --- (In reply to Artem S. Tashkinov from comment #13)
The patch does nothing.
Pardon me. I've failed to check if the patch is still effective in 5.22 - it isn't, things regressed more. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50156 --- Comment #16 from Artem S. Tashkinov <aros(a)gmx.com> --- (In reply to Rafał Mużyło from comment #15)
Pardon me. I've failed to check if the patch is still effective in 5.22 - it isn't, things regressed more.
It's OK! In a perfect world I'd still love these regressions to be fixed in the main tree instead of applying patches. I wonder why Alexander who actually submitted all these massive changes keeps mum about this bug report. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
participants (1)
-
WineHQ Bugzilla