[Bug 36031] New: 9700M incorrectly detected as 9400
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36031 Bug ID: 36031 Summary: 9700M incorrectly detected as 9400 Product: Wine Version: 1.7.16 Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: funkydude87(a)hotmail.co.uk Running the Battle.net client and attempting to launch WoW. Using the nouveau drivers under 64bit Ubuntu 14.04 and getting a warning message: OS: Windows XP x64 service pack 2 Card: Nvidia Geforce 9400 GT It is a warning that my system is below the minimum recommendations. When launching the game, certain graphical features are disabled that are otherwise enabled under Windows. This is a laptop with a Geforce 9700M GT, it thinks I'm running a 9400 desktop card. It also thinks I'm running XP SP2, not sure if that's correct or should be SP3. lspci result of my card in linux: 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: NVIDIA Corporation G96M [GeForce 9700M GT] (rev a1) -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36031 funkydude <funkydude87(a)hotmail.co.uk> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |funkydude87(a)hotmail.co.uk -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36031 --- Comment #1 from funkydude <funkydude87(a)hotmail.co.uk> --- Created attachment 48183 --> http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=48183 lspci lspci -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36031 --- Comment #2 from Henri Verbeet <hverbeet(a)gmail.com> --- That's essentially the same GPU, though probably clocked differently, etc. (See also http://nouveau.freedesktop.org/wiki/CodeNames/) Just to verify though, glxinfo does report that as "NV96", right? I doubt the slight difference in the reported card is causing this issue though, it's more likely that the GL driver doesn't implement some feature that we need to implement some D3D feature, and WoW warns because of that. I.e., I think it's more likely that this is about the reported D3D device caps than about the name. Common issues there are missing support for floating point textures or S3TC texture compression, although I can't say if that's the case in this specific instance. Does the application create any kind of log file with more detailed information about what it thinks is missing? If not, perhaps the first 1000 or so lines of a WINEDEBUG="+tid,+d3d" log could be helpful. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36031 --- Comment #3 from funkydude <funkydude87(a)hotmail.co.uk> --- Some features say "unsupported for graphics related reasons", others say "requires a GPU with shader model 3 support". I'll look into a winelog and check glxinfo. Can't it be fixed to correctly recognize the card though? -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36031 --- Comment #4 from Henri Verbeet <hverbeet(a)gmail.com> --- (In reply to funkydude from comment #3)
Can't it be fixed to correctly recognize the card though?
Not easily. That's mostly because Nouveau doesn't distinguish between those cards, and we depend on it to get our information. Perhaps that GLX_MESA_query_renderer can help in the future by matching on PCI ID, but it will probably be a while before we support that, and even then it's not clear we really want to go there. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36031 --- Comment #5 from funkydude <funkydude87(a)hotmail.co.uk> --- So this isn't just a matter of a modification like this ticket? http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35486 Browsing directx.c I don't see any mention of an nvidia 9700, as if it's missing. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36031 --- Comment #6 from funkydude <funkydude87(a)hotmail.co.uk> --- I'm also confused how this could be an issue with nouveau providing you the wrong info but I can see it identified correctly in Linux itself using nouveau... but I am a total noob at these things. :) -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36031 --- Comment #7 from funkydude <funkydude87(a)hotmail.co.uk> --- How I wish I could edit comments... :P It doesn't appear that the id "064a" (I think that's the ID from lspci) is listed in wined3d_private.h -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36031 --- Comment #8 from funkydude <funkydude87(a)hotmail.co.uk> --- Can it be added? -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36031 --- Comment #9 from funkydude <funkydude87(a)hotmail.co.uk> --- Bump. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36031 funkydude <funkydude87(a)hotmail.co.uk> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|1.7.16 |1.7.19 --- Comment #10 from funkydude <funkydude87(a)hotmail.co.uk> --- Still an issue. Am I wrong assuming it can just be added to the list of IDs like other card have been? -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36031 --- Comment #11 from funkydude <funkydude87(a)hotmail.co.uk> --- Bump. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36031 --- Comment #12 from Henri Verbeet <hverbeet(a)gmail.com> --- (In reply to funkydude from comment #10)
Still an issue. Am I wrong assuming it can just be added to the list of IDs like other card have been? I'm afraid so. I'm not sure what else to reply, beyond repeating comment 4.
But card detecting aside, I think that the issue you're really trying to solve is some features being disabled in the game, and it's likely to be an unrelated issue. Perhaps a WINEDEBUG="+seh,+tid,+d3d" log will contain some helpful information. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36031 --- Comment #13 from funkydude <funkydude87(a)hotmail.co.uk> --- Where does one place that variable to enable that enhanced logging? -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36031 --- Comment #14 from Henri Verbeet <hverbeet(a)gmail.com> --- At the start of the command line. So e.g.: WINEDEBUG="+seh,+tid,+d3d" wine Wow.exe >> trace.log 2>&1 The resulting log file may be large, so you'll probably want to compress it with e.g. xz before attaching it here. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36031 --- Comment #15 from Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> --- This is your friendly reminder that there has been no bug activity for over a year. Is this still an issue in current (1.7.51 or newer) wine? -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36031 super_man(a)post.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |super_man(a)post.com --- Comment #16 from super_man(a)post.com --- (In reply to Henri Verbeet from comment #4)
(In reply to funkydude from comment #3)
Can't it be fixed to correctly recognize the card though?
Not easily. That's mostly because Nouveau doesn't distinguish between those cards, and we depend on it to get our information. Perhaps that GLX_MESA_query_renderer can help in the future by matching on PCI ID, but it will probably be a while before we support that, and even then it's not clear we really want to go there.
There should be better support now. Its just that OP isnt too responsive. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36031 --- Comment #17 from funkydude <funkydude87(a)hotmail.co.uk> --- Active? I reported this 2 years ago. If it has finally been resolved, that's great. I don't have access to this laptop any more, so you're free to close it if you wish. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36031 --- Comment #18 from super_man(a)post.com --- Patch towards this bug was committed. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36031 Bruno Jesus <00cpxxx(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|9700M incorrectly detected |GeForce 9700M incorrectly |as 9400 |detected as 9400 --- Comment #19 from Bruno Jesus <00cpxxx(a)gmail.com> --- (In reply to super_man from comment #18)
Patch towards this bug was committed.
After reading all bug I'm not sure http://source.winehq.org/git/wine.git/?a=commit;h=5f4c496480d2b07711e37185de... really fixes this or not. But I will let someone else decide. Since OP didn't answer comment 14 and no longer has the required hardware it could also be abandoned. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36031 --- Comment #20 from Henri Verbeet <hverbeet(a)gmail.com> --- (In reply to Bruno Jesus from comment #19)
After reading all bug I'm not sure http://source.winehq.org/git/wine.git/?a=commit; h=5f4c496480d2b07711e37185de616b4d8304e4e5 really fixes this or not. But I will let someone else decide. Since OP didn't answer comment 14 and no longer has the required hardware it could also be abandoned.
It does, sort of. If you have a version of Mesa with GLX_MESA_query_renderer, and a GeForce 9700M with 10de:064a as PCI ID, it will match that entry in gpu_description_table[]. It won't help if you have a GeForce 9700M with a different PCI device ID. (Provided those exist.) -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36031 --- Comment #21 from funkydude <funkydude87(a)hotmail.co.uk> --- (In reply to Bruno Jesus from comment #19)
Since OP didn't answer comment 14 and no longer has the required hardware it could also be abandoned.
There was nothing to answer. It took 2 years for my original request to be serviced. I pointed out the problem in comment 7, then was told I was wrong, then 2 years later apparently I was right? :-) The original warning WoW was printing was a hardcoded warning for detecting cards below the minimum spec. It was detecting the card as 9400, hence I requested that be resolved. It is highly unlikely any form of feature detection was actually taking place for displaying that warning. The point is moot now. Even if the card is correctly detected now, I doubt that it will pass WoW's latest minimum specs heh. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36031 Bruno Jesus <00cpxxx(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed by SHA1| |5f4c496480d2b07711e37185de6 | |16b4d8304e4e5 Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED --- Comment #22 from Bruno Jesus <00cpxxx(a)gmail.com> --- (In reply to funkydude from comment #21)
(In reply to Bruno Jesus from comment #19)
Since OP didn't answer comment 14 and no longer has the required hardware it could also be abandoned.
There was nothing to answer.
Henri asked for a log in comment 12, you didn't know how to do in comment 13, he explained in comment 14, you did not reply to that, this is what I'm talking about. But this is just an unfruitful discussion, better resolve as fixed as other bugs related to detecting cards. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36031 Kim Malmo <berencamlost(a)msn.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |berencamlost(a)msn.com --- Comment #23 from Kim Malmo <berencamlost(a)msn.com> --- (In reply to Bruno Jesus from comment #19)
(In reply to super_man from comment #18)
Patch towards this bug was committed.
After reading all bug I'm not sure http://source.winehq.org/git/wine.git/?a=commit; h=5f4c496480d2b07711e37185de616b4d8304e4e5 really fixes this or not. But I will let someone else decide. Since OP didn't answer comment 14 and no longer has the required hardware it could also be abandoned.
For what it's worth, with both Mesa 11.1.2 and Nvidia 340.93 drivers (tried separately) the 9700M is now correctly detected with this commit. It won't solve the underlying issue with the reported missing features. What comes to mind is that WoW has both a DX and a GL renderer, or at least it used to have. There could be feature differences between these. While I could try WoW through Wine, I have no way of comparing it with Windows. I can do some testing however. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36031 Michael Stefaniuc <mstefani(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|--- |1.8.x CC| |mstefani(a)redhat.com -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36031 Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED --- Comment #24 from Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org> --- Closing bugs fixed in 1.9.9. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36031 funkydude <funkydude87(a)hotmail.co.uk> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|funkydude87(a)hotmail.co.uk | -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36031 Michael Stefaniuc <mstefani(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|1.8.x |--- --- Comment #25 from Michael Stefaniuc <mstefani(a)redhat.com> --- Removing 1.8.x milestone from bugs included in 1.8.3. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
participants (1)
-
wine-bugs＠winehq.org