[Bug 24074] New: configure: printf: Argument list too long
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24074 Summary: configure: printf: Argument list too long Product: Wine Version: unspecified Platform: x86 OS/Version: FreeBSD Status: NEW Keywords: download, source Severity: trivial Priority: P2 Component: build-env AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: austinenglish(a)gmail.com I only see this on FreeBSD (PC-BSD 7.1) Running with sh -x configure, I found a bit more info: + printf %s\n ALL_MAKEFILE_DEPENDS='# Makefile dependencies Make.rules: Make.rules.in config.status Maketest.rules: Maketest.rules.in Make.rules config.status dlls/Makedll.rules: dlls/Makedll.rules.in Make.rules config.status dlls/Makeimplib.rules: dlls/Makeimplib.rules.in Make.rules config.status programs/Makeprog.rules: programs/Makeprog.rules.in Make.rules config.status Makefile: Makefile.in Make.rules config.status ... ... tools/wmc/Makefile tools/wmc/__depend__: tools/wmc/Makefile.in config.status Make.rules $(MAKEDEP) @./config.status --file tools/wmc/Makefile && cd tools/wmc && $(MAKE) depend tools/wrc/__clean__ tools/wrc/__install__ tools/wrc/__install-dev__ tools/wrc/__install-lib__ tools/wrc/__uninstall__ tools/wrc: tools/wrc/Makefile tools/wrc/Makefile tools/wrc/__depend__: tools/wrc/Makefile.in config.status Make.rules $(MAKEDEP) @./config.status --file tools/wrc/Makefile && cd tools/wrc && $(MAKE) depend' configure: printf: Argument list too long seems printf doesn't like that big list, may need to break it up. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24074 --- Comment #1 from Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org> 2010-08-21 16:07:18 --- I don't see why it would get printed. Please attach the full log. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24074 Dmitry Timoshkov <dmitry(a)codeweavers.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|unspecified |1.3.1 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24074 --- Comment #2 from Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> 2010-08-22 02:18:06 --- Created an attachment (id=30284) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=30284) last 10k lines Here's the last 10k. If you want the full log, it's 205 MB uncompressed, 6.6 if bzip2 -9'ed. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24074 --- Comment #3 from Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> 2010-08-22 02:18:49 --- Created an attachment (id=30285) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=30285) config.log -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24074 --- Comment #4 from Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> 2010-08-22 02:19:28 --- Created an attachment (id=30286) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=30286) ./configure's output And stdout/stderr from ./configure itself (wasn't sure which log you wanted). -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24074 --- Comment #5 from Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org> 2010-08-22 14:26:46 --- I'm guessing it's because it's not a shell builtin. Does it work if you run configure explicitly with bash? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24074 --- Comment #6 from Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> 2010-08-22 15:10:39 --- (In reply to comment #5)
I'm guessing it's because it's not a shell builtin. Does it work if you run configure explicitly with bash?
Yeah. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24074 aaron.hamid(a)gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |aaron.hamid(a)gmail.com --- Comment #7 from aaron.hamid(a)gmail.com 2011-05-20 00:25:24 CDT --- It seems like bash is a reasonable prereq. Does this need fixing? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24074 --- Comment #8 from Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> 2011-05-20 11:01:45 CDT --- (In reply to comment #7)
It seems like bash is a reasonable prereq. Does this need fixing?
Considering that wine aims to be portable, I don't think requiring bash is a reasonable requirement. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24074 Dan Kegel <dank(a)kegel.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dank(a)kegel.com --- Comment #9 from Dan Kegel <dank(a)kegel.com> 2011-05-20 14:30:08 CDT --- Please turn this into a simple test case and file the appropriate bug with freebsd. It might be a kernel bug, or it could be a bug in the shell and printf, or both. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24074 --- Comment #10 from Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org> 2011-05-20 17:05:07 CDT --- (In reply to comment #9)
Please turn this into a simple test case and file the appropriate bug with freebsd. It might be a kernel bug, or it could be a bug in the shell and printf, or both.
None of the above. It's just that printf is not a builtin so there's a limit on the command line size. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24074 --- Comment #11 from Dan Kegel <dank(a)kegel.com> 2011-05-20 17:33:49 CDT --- http://www.in-ulm.de/~mascheck/various/argmax/ has an awesome summary of the limit on commandline length on various unixes. In Linux-2.6.33 and later, the limit was raised significantly (to "1/4 of the stack space"). (This patch came from Google (Hi Ollie!).) It's possible that on modern linux, you wouldn't run into this problem even without builtin printf. If that's the case, then IMHO it's still worth filing an enhancement request with FreeBSD. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24074 --- Comment #12 from Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org> 2011-05-22 05:38:44 CDT --- Actually it should no longer be using printf on that variable. Has anybody retested this recently? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24074 Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED --- Comment #13 from Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> 2011-05-22 17:27:34 CDT --- No, doesn't appear anymore for me. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24074 Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED --- Comment #14 from Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org> 2011-05-27 13:36:30 CDT --- Closing bugs fixed in 1.3.21. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
participants (1)
-
wine-bugs＠winehq.org