[Bug 22033] New: World of Warcraft Crashes on statup
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22033 Summary: World of Warcraft Crashes on statup Product: Wine Version: 1.1.40 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Solaris Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: blocker Priority: P2 Component: -unknown AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: jason.whipp(a)gmail.com Created an attachment (id=26793) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=26793) Console and Wowerror output OS: OpenSolaris snv_134 Wine: 1.1.40 (Compiled) When launching WoW, I get a screen that looks like it's going to start, but then immediately crashes. I can here the sound from the app running, but no video and the wowerror crash screen comes up, follow by the wine "This program had an error" dialog. I've appended the the console and wowerror output into an attachment. In the OSOL contrib repo, there is a binary version of wine 1.0.1. With this version, WoW runs fine, except there's no sound (the contrib version doesn't detect any sound drivers). Help appreciated, very willing to try recommendations and get more output to you if need be. I've also tried using WoW in full screen, with a virtual desktop in full screen and in windowed mode. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22033 Vitaliy Margolen <vitaliy(a)kievinfo.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|blocker |normal --- Comment #1 from Vitaliy Margolen <vitaliy(a)kievinfo.com> 2010-03-13 20:47:21 --- Not blocker: http://bugs.winehq.org/page.cgi?id=fields.html#bug_severity Looks like a video driver bug to me - since you running WoW in opengl mode. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22033 Jase Whipp <jason.whipp(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|World of Warcraft Crashes |World of Warcraft Crashes |on statup |on startup --- Comment #2 from Jase Whipp <jason.whipp(a)gmail.com> 2010-03-14 13:01:11 --- Just tested with NVidia 195.30, same result. When I saw the output, I'd normally agree, however with the app working fine with 1.0.1, I had my doubts. I have a Linux workstation (Fedora 12 x86_64) running 1.1.38, NVidia 195.30 which runs flawlessly, so I am suspecting this is a Wine OpenSolaris specific issue. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22033 --- Comment #3 from Jase Whipp <jason.whipp(a)gmail.com> 2010-03-14 13:03:14 --- Also, sorry about the blocker status, I must've missed setting that when I submitted the bug. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22033 --- Comment #4 from Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> 2010-03-14 15:10:16 --- (In reply to comment #2)
Just tested with NVidia 195.30, same result.
When I saw the output, I'd normally agree, however with the app working fine with 1.0.1, I had my doubts.
Please run a regression test: http://wiki.winehq.org/RegressionTesting -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22033 Roderick Colenbrander <thunderbird2k(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |thunderbird2k(a)gmail.com --- Comment #5 from Roderick Colenbrander <thunderbird2k(a)gmail.com> 2010-03-21 16:53:03 --- The game crashes in the opengl driver (libGL.so). We don't do any opengl emulation (we directly forward it all) if you are running the game in opengl mode. It looks like an Nvidia driver issue. As a workaround try running the game in Direct3D mode. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22033 --- Comment #6 from Jase Whipp <jason.whipp(a)gmail.com> 2010-03-21 23:59:26 --- Repeated the same test with no -opengl param to Wow.exe. Runs fine under 1.0.1 in both modes (though performance is not as great in D3D mode). Under 1.1.40, I receive the error indicated in the report with -opengl, with out opengl: err:seh:raise_exception Unhandled exception code c0000005 flags 0 addr febdc863 err:seh:raise_exception Unhandled exception code c0000005 flags 0 addr 7f8c9851 There's a string of errors supplied before these two lines, full output is in the attachment "wow-gl-errors.text". I understand that wine doesn't provide the rendering, but that is not the issue. We have a working app in wine v 1.0.1, and not working 1.1.40 with the same video drivers, in fact, with no OS modification what so ever. My theory? Something between wine 1.0.1 and 1.1.40 broke direct rendering on Open Solaris under Wine. Also, not that it is a major point, but the same test system also runs compiz, but I had it disabled during the testing. I REALLY doubt there is a video driver or vendor opengl issue here. To the regression test, I respectfully decline, I've had other issues, some of which I have commented in other bug reports, compiling wine. The wine 1.1.40 is from the ASwine package available on sunfreepacks.com. Compiled by someone with a lot more knowledge of the compilation process. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22033 --- Comment #7 from Jase Whipp <jason.whipp(a)gmail.com> 2010-03-22 00:01:09 --- Created an attachment (id=26965) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=26965) Full error output from Wine 1.1.40 running Wow.exe in DirectX mode -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22033 --- Comment #8 from Roderick Colenbrander <thunderbird2k(a)gmail.com> 2010-03-22 04:00:03 --- Perform a regression test. Perhaps solaris is suffering from the virtual memory issue we had on Linux before. That would explain the out of memory messages. It would be the Solaris version of http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13335. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22033 Johann <johann(a)myrkraverk.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |johann(a)myrkraverk.com --- Comment #9 from Johann <johann(a)myrkraverk.com> 2010-05-02 11:16:57 --- Workaround: Downgrade to 1.1.29, WoW works in that version with sound in builds 115 and later. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22033 Johann <johann(a)myrkraverk.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |julliard(a)winehq.org --- Comment #10 from Johann <johann(a)myrkraverk.com> 2010-05-02 19:32:09 --- Regression testing between 1.1.29 and 1.1.35 gives the following results: 1aa749d9e7ee54f221373ccb2b47bcb31ef6533f is first bad commit commit 1aa749d9e7ee54f221373ccb2b47bcb31ef6533f Author: Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org> Date: Tue Oct 27 19:06:48 2009 +0100 libwine: Reserve some low memory space even without a preloader. :040000 040000 c6cbdf6fa3f40c287da32a6a3906d4d0ad7c5909 9fee74fb30f8b9bb7ccc3905c65607d13aabdf8b M libs -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22033 Roderick Colenbrander <thunderbird2k(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|--- |1.2.0 Severity|normal |major --- Comment #11 from Roderick Colenbrander <thunderbird2k(a)gmail.com> 2010-05-03 03:08:42 --- I already feared it was related to the memory code. While (Open)Solaris isn't the most popular Wine platform, I think we want this to work fine for 1.2 and this bug looks quite serious. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22033 Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |regression Component|-unknown |loader -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22033 Albert Lee <trisk(a)forkgnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |trisk(a)forkgnu.org --- Comment #12 from Albert Lee <trisk(a)forkgnu.org> 2010-05-03 12:20:57 --- This is probably a duplicate of #22023. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22033 --- Comment #13 from Johann <johann(a)myrkraverk.com> 2010-05-03 13:44:05 --- Created an attachment (id=27693) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=27693) pmap before crash -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22033 --- Comment #14 from Johann <johann(a)myrkraverk.com> 2010-05-04 03:53:33 --- Truss log, 77M: http://raven.myrkraverk.com/~johann/truss-wow.log Compressed, 1.2M: http://raven.myrkraverk.com/~johann/truss-wow.log.7z -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22033 Jerome Leclanche <adys.wh(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |adys.wh(a)gmail.com --- Comment #15 from Jerome Leclanche <adys.wh(a)gmail.com> 2010-05-04 04:01:35 --- (In reply to comment #14)
Truss log, 77M: http://raven.myrkraverk.com/~johann/truss-wow.log Compressed, 1.2M: http://raven.myrkraverk.com/~johann/truss-wow.log.7z
Links are dead. Please attach the compressed version on bugzilla. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22033 Matt Lewandowsky <matt(a)greenviolet.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |matt(a)greenviolet.net --- Comment #16 from Matt Lewandowsky <matt(a)greenviolet.net> 2010-05-04 04:10:39 --- (In reply to comment #15) The compressed version is too large for bugzilla. I suppose that's the reason for external hosting. :) -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22033 --- Comment #17 from Johann <johann(a)myrkraverk.com> 2010-05-04 04:11:59 --- Created an attachment (id=27703) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=27703) Patch against 1.1.43: #if 0's commit 1aa749d -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22033 Matt Lewandowsky <matt(a)greenviolet.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #18 from Matt Lewandowsky <matt(a)greenviolet.net> 2010-05-04 05:12:07 --- *** This bug has been confirmed by popular vote. *** -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22033 --- Comment #19 from Matt Lewandowsky <matt(a)greenviolet.net> 2010-05-04 05:17:57 --- Conversing with Johann on IRC, it was discovered that the bad patch is at least the cause for bug 22023 and a few apps in my test suite which have been problematic the past dozen builds or so. As for the "solution", I can't say. But I can say Johann's patch against 1.1.43 makes a good half dozen apps in my test suite work as they should and used to on OpenSolaris. Hopefully tomorrow I'll find the chance to test some more recently-broken apps on OpenSolaris and FreeBSD (the problem has been seen both places). Was 1aa749d9e7ee54f221373ccb2b47bcb31ef6533f tested on platforms other than Linux? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22033 --- Comment #20 from Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org> 2010-05-04 05:39:12 --- (In reply to comment #19)
Was 1aa749d9e7ee54f221373ccb2b47bcb31ef6533f tested on platforms other than Linux?
It was made specifically for Solaris, that code path isn't even executed on Linux. It's needed for .NET support. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22033 --- Comment #21 from Matt Lewandowsky <matt(a)greenviolet.net> 2010-05-04 05:47:37 --- (In reply to comment #20) OK. I haven't actually taken more than the most cursory glance at the patch yet. I just noted that it worked... ;) I guess that means the similar behavior I'm observing on FreeBSD is another bug. So ignore me on that for now. :) Is there any easy answer to this problem? .NET vs almost anything 3D is a tough choice to make... -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22033 Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |6tsukiyami9(a)gmail.com --- Comment #22 from Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> 2010-05-04 10:53:32 --- *** Bug 22023 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22033 --- Comment #23 from Johann <johann(a)myrkraverk.com> 2010-05-04 16:23:00 --- Workaround/Fix: Add LD_PRELOAD=libmapmalloc.so to the environment. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22033 --- Comment #24 from Matt Lewandowsky <matt(a)greenviolet.net> 2010-05-04 17:02:41 --- (In reply to comment #23) LD_PRELOAD is never a solution. :( Adding -lmapmalloc to LDFLAGS is a better solution. The question is probably currently "Is mapmalloc the best choice on Solaris, since there are a half-dozen mallocs available with the OS, and perhaps even bypassing those would be sane?" mapmalloc pretty much is malloc with mmap instead of sbrk. I've not found numbers showing how much it improves on the standard malloc (and where it fails in comparison), but I can't imagine it being THAT much faster. http://developers.sun.com/solaris/articles/multiproc/multiproc.html is probably a good starting point for how the different mallocs work on Solaris. I'm somewhat partial to mtmalloc, myself, but I've not tested wine with it yet, and I don't know if the heap size would be detrimental. Perhaps the interim fix could be to document that one may need to include -lmapmalloc in LD_FLAGS on Solaris builds at this time? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22033 --- Comment #25 from Maurizio Oliveri <6tsukiyami9(a)gmail.com> 2010-05-05 10:04:50 --- Ijust tried to build wine .43 adding -lmapmalloc to LD_FLAGS, and altough 3D apps run (I didn't try any .NET one though) there are some serious performance issues. I tried running 'time winecfg', and... using -lmapmalloc: Real: 24,83s User: 4,45s System: 0,81s Percent: 21% Cmd: winecfg reverting the patch: Real: 5,64s User: 0,48s System: 0,49s Percent: 17% Cmd: winecfg Both times, winecfg didn't have to update/create the .wine directory, I've removed it before both tests, used winecfg to create ~/.wine, then run winecfg again with the time command, closing the window as soon as it popped up. Of course, this also happens when running any application, the startup time is really long. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22033 --- Comment #26 from Johann <johann(a)myrkraverk.com> 2010-05-05 13:55:49 --- Yes, mapmalloc is a serious performance hog. Using /usr/lib/firefox/libjemalloc.so gives much better performance. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22033 --- Comment #27 from Matt Lewandowsky <matt(a)greenviolet.net> 2010-05-06 18:40:47 --- (In reply to comment #26) mapmalloc may be a performance hog, but so far my testing is indicating that: 1) "It works." 2) It's available as a core piece of Solaris (even before 9, which is the oldest version anyone should even think of using Wine on...). jemalloc doesn't meet #2, which is kind of important. And I'm seeing various issues with concurrent allocations, which mapmalloc does not support (and therefore works across the board so far). Also, if jemalloc was argued as Wine's default allocator, it would not likely be usable for Wine on OS X, according to various comments in the sources. My testing is ongoing. This is just a summary for the bug's sake of ongoing conversations on IRC. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22033 Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|1.2.0 |--- --- Comment #28 from Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org> 2010-06-16 08:07:04 --- Broken Solaris malloc, won't be fixed for 1.2. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22033 --- Comment #29 from Maurizio Oliveri <6tsukiyami9(a)gmail.com> 2010-06-16 08:35:48 --- (In reply to comment #28)
Broken Solaris malloc, won't be fixed for 1.2.
Guess we'll have to check out the git repo and manually revert the 1aa749d9e7ee54f221373ccb2b47bcb31ef6533f patch to make EVERY game (at least, the ones using 3D) work until this is fixed... I've been doing this since 1.1.33, so it's no big news for me, but you may want to put this info somewhere visible so the Solaris users will be able to use wine for something different than Office :) By the way... Is this bug in the 1.3 milestone now?? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22033 --- Comment #30 from Jase Whipp <jason.whipp(a)gmail.com> 2010-06-16 10:44:19 --- Keep in mind, this bug is OpenSolaris related, not Solaris 10, there's a fair amount of difference. I've also been following OSOL development which seems to have stagnated, I'd agree delaying this bug due to that fact. I also think a note on the wiki about the patching would be good for those running OSOL. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22033 --- Comment #31 from Johann <johann(a)myrkraverk.com> 2010-06-16 18:35:14 --- I'll just add that I've been using -lumem with UMEM_OPTIONS=backend=mmap with good results for WoW. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22033 --- Comment #32 from Albert Lee <trisk(a)forkgnu.org> 2010-06-17 23:28:36 --- (In reply to comment #30)
Keep in mind, this bug is OpenSolaris related, not Solaris 10, there's a fair amount of difference. I've also been following OSOL development which seems to have stagnated, I'd agree delaying this bug due to that fact.
The default malloc is largely unchanged from S10, so this bug should also affect it. Not sure what you're basing "stagnated" on.
I also think a note on the wiki about the patching would be good for those running OSOL.
Agreed, although this will be less of a problem once the /contrib and other popular packages have a workaround. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22033 Dmitry Timoshkov <dmitry(a)codeweavers.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|loader |-unknown Summary|World of Warcraft Crashes |World of Warcraft Crashes |on startup |on startup (due to broken | |Solaris malloc()) Severity|major |normal -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22033 --- Comment #33 from Maurizio Oliveri <6tsukiyami9(a)gmail.com> 2010-06-18 07:44:37 --- Why is this set as normal ("for an application crash or other issue") now? It still does affect a wide range of apps (thus should be major)... Maybe the list of affected apps should be updated too -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22033 --- Comment #34 from Dmitry Timoshkov <dmitry(a)codeweavers.com> 2010-06-18 07:50:19 --- (In reply to comment #33)
Why is this set as normal ("for an application crash or other issue") now? It still does affect a wide range of apps (thus should be major)... Maybe the list of affected apps should be updated too
Because now it implies that it's not really a Wine bug, but having a workaround could be considered possible. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22033 Henri Verbeet <hverbeet(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Regression SHA1| |1aa749d9e7ee54f221373ccb2b4 | |7bcb31ef6533f -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22033 Ken Mays <maybird1776(a)yahoo.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |maybird1776(a)yahoo.com --- Comment #35 from Ken Mays <maybird1776(a)yahoo.com> 2011-08-27 12:49:33 CDT --- (In reply to comment #34)
(In reply to comment #33)
Why is this set as normal ("for an application crash or other issue") now? It still does affect a wide range of apps (thus should be major)... Maybe the list of affected apps should be updated too
Because now it implies that it's not really a Wine bug, but having a workaround could be considered possible.
Can you confirm if this is an issue with Wine 1.3.27? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22033 --- Comment #36 from Ken Mays <maybird1776(a)yahoo.com> 2011-08-30 05:07:41 CDT --- (In reply to comment #0)
Created an attachment (id=26793) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=26793) [details] Console and Wowerror output
OS: OpenSolaris snv_134 Wine: 1.1.40 (Compiled)
When launching WoW, I get a screen that looks like it's going to start, but then immediately crashes. I can here the sound from the app running, but no video and the wowerror crash screen comes up, follow by the wine "This program had an error" dialog. I've appended the the console and wowerror output into an attachment.
In the OSOL contrib repo, there is a binary version of wine 1.0.1. With this version, WoW runs fine, except there's no sound (the contrib version doesn't detect any sound drivers).
Help appreciated, very willing to try recommendations and get more output to you if need be.
I've also tried using WoW in full screen, with a virtual desktop in full screen and in windowed mode.
OS: Solaris 11 Express snv_151 Wine 1.3.27 (Compiled) Tested App: World of Warcraft: Cataclysm patch 4.2: Rage of the Firelands. You can resolve this ticket. Solaris can use "-lumem" instead of malloc (older implementations) due to the multithreaded/SMP design of the OS. So, you could patch for Solaris 10/11 (sunos5) to use '-lumem' in this case for better scalability. Sound for Wow on Solaris 10/11 is just dependent on if the contributing person enabled sound or not in the contributed Wine package. Don't bother with the fancier methods if they are not default system libs. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22033 --- Comment #37 from Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> 2013-11-13 16:52:35 CST --- This is your friendly reminder that there has been no bug activity for 2 years. Is this still an issue in current (1.7.6 or newer) wine? If so, please attach the terminal output in 1.7.6 (see http://wiki.winehq.org/FAQ#get_log). -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22033 Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |ABANDONED --- Comment #38 from Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> --- Abandoned. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22033 Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED --- Comment #39 from Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> --- Closing. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22033 Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |malicorne(a)chez.com --- Comment #40 from Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> --- *** Bug 40783 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
participants (1)
-
wine-bugs＠winehq.org