[Bug 11553] New: Paintbrush movement becomes erratic
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11553 Summary: Paintbrush movement becomes erratic Product: Wine Version: 0.9.54. Platform: PC-x86-64 OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major Priority: P2 Component: -unknown AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: erasmo(a)erasmix.net If I select a large brush size, the brush seems to crawl behind the mouse. I'm not sure if this is due to my graphics card. I have an onboard ATI Technologies Inc Rage XL rev 39, Mem @ 0xf1000000/24, 0xf2041000/12, I/O @ 0x9c00/8, which is supposed to be very slow, but I'm not sure if its enough to cause this behavior. Could someone try setting a large paintbrush size and move it around to determine if this is really a bug? For more information, please see screenshot: http://download.erasmix.net/CS2-WINE/Screenshot-9.png -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11553 Vitaliy Margolen <vitaliy(a)kievinfo.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|major |minor --- Comment #1 from Vitaliy Margolen <vitaliy(a)kievinfo.com> 2008-02-11 21:11:44 --- Test it on a faster PC I guess. Not major. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11553 Dan Kegel <dank(a)kegel.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dank(a)kegel.com Summary|Paintbrush movement becomes |Paintbrush movement becomes |erratic |erratic with large brush in | |photoshop --- Comment #2 from Dan Kegel <dank(a)kegel.com> 2008-02-11 21:25:58 --- Can you boot the same machine in Windows and see if Photoshop for Windows performs better? Also, how many pixels large is the brush when problems happen? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11553 --- Comment #3 from Erasmo Acosta <erasmo(a)erasmix.net> 2008-02-11 21:36:31 --- (In reply to comment #2) Sorry, I don't have dual boot on. I only have one box with linux and one with Windows, I can't test it on a different machine. The size of the brush is a 1000 pixels, you can see it on the screenshot :-) If the bug is confirmed, the severity should be raised. It's impossible to control the brush. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11553 Dan Kegel <dank(a)kegel.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Keywords| |download --- Comment #4 from Dan Kegel <dank(a)kegel.com> 2008-02-12 16:28:48 --- Tested this with Photoshop 6 (last version without a time limit on the trial). Used largest possible brush size, 999 pixels. Sure enough, it's slower on Linux than on Windows, enough that the mouse is hard to control. (And this was on a damn fast computer with a great graphics card and craploads of RAM.) Perhaps this is a case of not throwing away stale mouse motion events? I don't think a DIBengine would help, as I don't see any messages like those in http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=421#c26 Can you tell us how frequently you use large brushes, what size they tend to be, and what you use them for? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11553 --- Comment #5 from Erasmo Acosta <erasmo(a)erasmix.net> 2008-02-12 16:59:33 --- (In reply to comment #4) It depends on the photographer, the image, and the kind of correction. In my case using a smaller brush size would leave brush patterns on areas of the image with a smooth pattern (like the sky or water). The larger the image, the more likely you'll need "large" brush sizes. My images are 12.8 megapixels. Furthermore, the size I used on the test, 1000 pix, is not by far the largest I normally use. So to answer your question, YES very common. I was really hoping this was not a bug, but related to my graphics card. However, since it is, I'd advice you to raise the severity. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11553 --- Comment #6 from Erasmo Acosta <erasmo(a)erasmix.net> 2008-02-12 17:30:06 --- (In reply to comment #5) Yes I forgot. Mostly you use them for Dodge & Burning, but they have loads of uses. Like when you do bracketing and have two exposures of the same scene, and you use a brush to reveal portions of one scene that are dark on the other one. I've also used them to clone out a piece of a street light. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11553 Dmitry Timoshkov <dmitry(a)codeweavers.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dmitry(a)codeweavers.com --- Comment #7 from Dmitry Timoshkov <dmitry(a)codeweavers.com> 2008-02-13 08:23:03 --- This seems to be related to a missing optimized code path for SRCINVERT in dlls/winex11.drv/bitblt.c,BITBLT_InternalStretchBlt(). Once I add SRCINVERT case to any existing case statements (say DSTINVERT) any slowdown in mouse movements goes away, though painting apparently becomes wrong. Now what needs to be done is a proper implementation of SRCINVERT in X11 graphics terms. I'm not an expert in that, any takers? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11553 --- Comment #8 from Dmitry Timoshkov <dmitry(a)codeweavers.com> 2008-02-21 04:11:46 --- Created an attachment (id=10879) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=10879) Ad an optimized path for BitBlt(SRCINVERT) to winex11.drv Although Alexandre said that the code already does as much as it can, I decided to try anyway. Attached patch makes mouse movements with very large brush sizes as smooth as with small ones for me. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11553 Dmitry Timoshkov <dmitry(a)codeweavers.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|-unknown |winex11.drv -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11553 Dmitry Timoshkov <dmitry(a)codeweavers.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #10879|Ad an optimized path for |Add an optimized path for description|BitBlt(SRCINVERT) to |BitBlt(SRCINVERT) to |winex11.drv |winex11.drv -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11553 --- Comment #9 from Dmitry Timoshkov <dmitry(a)codeweavers.com> 2008-02-21 04:25:25 --- I sent it to wine-patches. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11553 --- Comment #10 from Dmitry Timoshkov <dmitry(a)codeweavers.com> 2008-02-21 07:45:26 --- Alexandre committed the patch. Please retest and close if appropriate. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11553 Dan Kegel <dank(a)kegel.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED --- Comment #11 from Dan Kegel <dank(a)kegel.com> 2008-02-21 10:45:11 --- LGTM, thanks! -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11553 Dan Kegel <dank(a)kegel.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED --- Comment #12 from Dan Kegel <dank(a)kegel.com> 2008-02-22 11:40:21 --- 0.9.56 released, so closing all bugs marked as RESOLVED FIXED. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
participants (1)
-
wine-bugs＠winehq.org