[Bug 34372] New: Add missing function AllocateAndGetTcpExTableFromStack() to iphlpapi.dll
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34372 Bug #: 34372 Summary: Add missing function AllocateAndGetTcpExTableFromStack() to iphlpapi.dll Product: Wine Version: 1.6 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: iphlpapi AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: ralf.habacker(a)freenet.de Classification: Unclassified Created attachment 45753 --> http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=45753 Implementation for AllocateAndGetTcpExTableFromStack() The appended patch adds the missing function AllocateAndGetTcpExTableFromStack() to iphlpapi.dll This missing function has been detected while testing of cross compiled dbus http://dbus.freedesktop.org under wine. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34372 --- Comment #1 from Bruno Jesus <00cpxxx(a)gmail.com> 2013-08-27 12:50:50 CDT --- Hi, thanks for your work. Patches are not picked from the bugzilla, please follow the instructions from http://wiki.winehq.org/SubmittingPatches -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34372 Bruno Jesus <00cpxxx(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |patch CC| |00cpxxx(a)gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34372 Ralf Habacker <ralf.habacker(a)freenet.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED --- Comment #2 from Ralf Habacker <ralf.habacker(a)freenet.de> 2013-08-29 01:10:38 CDT --- Patch has been submitted -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34372 Nikolay Sivov <bunglehead(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|FIXED | Ever Confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #3 from Nikolay Sivov <bunglehead(a)gmail.com> 2013-08-29 01:13:48 CDT --- It wasn't accepted yet. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34372 --- Comment #4 from Ralf Habacker <ralf.habacker(a)freenet.de> 2013-08-29 02:08:56 CDT --- (In reply to comment #1)
Hi, thanks for your work. Patches are not picked from the bugzilla, please follow the instructions from http://wiki.winehq.org/SubmittingPatches
Just a note: I was misleaded by a comment in the Attachments section of the bug tracker, which means Add an attachment (back traces, logs, *proposed patch*, testcase, etc.) -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34372 --- Comment #5 from Nikolay Sivov <bunglehead(a)gmail.com> 2013-08-29 02:22:37 CDT --- Attached patches are supposed to be used for testing only, to proof or disproof something. If it's good enough to be included it should be submitted to a list, it's the only way. But I agree, that line could sound misleading. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34372 Sebastian Lackner <sebastian(a)fds-team.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sebastian(a)fds-team.de -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34372 Anastasius Focht <focht(a)gmx.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |download Status|REOPENED |NEW URL| |http://sourceforge.net/proj | |ects/spammonitor/files/spam | |monitor/0.20/spammon-englis | |h.zip/download CC| |focht(a)gmx.net Summary|Add missing function |Multiple applications need |AllocateAndGetTcpExTableFro |AllocateAndGetTcpExTableFro |mStack() to iphlpapi.dll |mStack (cross compiled | |dbus, spamMonitor) --- Comment #6 from Anastasius Focht <focht(a)gmx.net> --- Hello folks, I found another application which makes use of this API: 'spamMonitor' Download: http://spamcleaner.org/en/spammonitor/ Source: http://spamcleaner.org/en/spammonitor/spammon_asm.html --- snip --- $ WINEDEBUG=+tid,+seh,+relay wine ./spammon.exe >>log.txt 2>&1 ... 0023:Call KERNEL32.LoadLibraryA(00402039 "iphlpapi.dll") ret=00401056 0023:Call PE DLL (proc=0x7e35f7f0,module=0x7e350000 L"iphlpapi.dll",reason=PROCESS_ATTACH,res=(nil)) ... 0023:Ret KERNEL32.LoadLibraryA() retval=7e350000 ret=00401056 0023:Call KERNEL32.GetProcAddress(7e350000,0040207c "AllocateAndGetTcpExTableFromStack") ret=00401082 0023:Ret KERNEL32.GetProcAddress() retval=00000000 ret=00401082 0023:Call KERNEL32.GetProcAddress(7e350000,0040209e "GetExtendedTcpTable") ret=004010ae 0023:Ret KERNEL32.GetProcAddress() retval=7e353e28 ret=004010ae --- snip --- $ sha1sum spammon-english.zip eff73e4c30464e808f13f35994f1bae6edfee381 spammon-english.zip $ du -sh spammon-english.zip 24K spammon-english.zip $ wine --version wine-1.7.36 Regards -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34372 --- Comment #7 from Sebastian Lackner <sebastian(a)fds-team.de> --- An improved version of the patch is part of wine-staging since quite some time: https://github.com/wine-compholio/wine-staging/tree/master/patches/iphlpapi-... -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34372 --- Comment #8 from Anastasius Focht <focht(a)gmx.net> --- Hello Sebastian, --- quote --- An improved version of the patch is part of wine-staging since quite some time --- quote --- Good to know .. but what is the problem with upstream then? Maybe I made a mistake but a quick search of wine-patches history since Jul 2014 reveals there wasn't a single attempt to get this in. Regards -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34372 --- Comment #9 from Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> --- I've sent a stub: https://source.winehq.org/patches/data/108989 -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34372 --- Comment #10 from Anastasius Focht <focht(a)gmx.net> --- Hello folks, obviously still present as of Wine 1.7.44 Regards -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34372 Michael Müller <michael(a)fds-team.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |STAGED CC| |michael(a)fds-team.de Staged patchset| |https://github.com/wine-com | |pholio/wine-staging/tree/ma | |ster/patches/iphlpapi-TCP_T | |able -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34372 André H. <nerv(a)dawncrow.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |nerv(a)dawncrow.de -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34372 --- Comment #11 from Anastasius Focht <focht(a)gmx.net> --- Hello folks, revisiting, still present. --- snip --- ... 004d:Ret PE DLL (proc=0x7e29b38e,module=0x7e280000 L"iphlpapi.dll",reason=PROCESS_ATTACH,res=(nil)) retval=1 004d:Ret KERNEL32.LoadLibraryA() retval=7e280000 ret=00401056 004d:Call KERNEL32.GetProcAddress(7e280000,0040207c "AllocateAndGetTcpExTableFromStack") ret=00401082 004d:Ret KERNEL32.GetProcAddress() retval=00000000 ret=00401082 004d:Call KERNEL32.GetProcAddress(7e280000,0040209e "GetExtendedTcpTable") ret=004010ae 004d:Ret KERNEL32.GetProcAddress() retval=7e28fdd8 ret=004010ae ... --- snip --- https://svwh.dl.sourceforge.net/project/spammonitor/spammonitor/0.20/spammon... $ wine --version wine-2.1-126-g06c5a9a Regards -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34372 --- Comment #12 from Hans Leidekker <hans(a)meelstraat.net> --- (In reply to Anastasius Focht from comment #11)
Hello folks,
revisiting, still present.
--- snip --- ... 004d:Ret PE DLL (proc=0x7e29b38e,module=0x7e280000 L"iphlpapi.dll",reason=PROCESS_ATTACH,res=(nil)) retval=1 004d:Ret KERNEL32.LoadLibraryA() retval=7e280000 ret=00401056 004d:Call KERNEL32.GetProcAddress(7e280000,0040207c "AllocateAndGetTcpExTableFromStack") ret=00401082 004d:Ret KERNEL32.GetProcAddress() retval=00000000 ret=00401082 004d:Call KERNEL32.GetProcAddress(7e280000,0040209e "GetExtendedTcpTable") ret=004010ae 004d:Ret KERNEL32.GetProcAddress() retval=7e28fdd8 ret=004010ae
Looks like it falls back to GetExtendedTcpTable though. Does the app really need AllocateAndGetTcpExTableFromStack? -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34372 --- Comment #13 from Anastasius Focht <focht(a)gmx.net> --- Hello Hans, --- quote --- Looks like it falls back to GetExtendedTcpTable though. Does the app really need AllocateAndGetTcpExTableFromStack? --- quote --- No, it doesn't need it (puts itself into systray after startup). For me it was easier to find another pre-built app using that API call instead of going through the hassle of cross-compiling the stuff from OP's initial comment (very little info provided, not even instructions how to exactly reproduce). One could argue to change the bug title to "want" instead of "need" though. Regards -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34372 Erich E. Hoover <erich.e.hoover(a)wine-staging.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |erich.e.hoover(a)wine-staging | |.com --- Comment #14 from Erich E. Hoover <erich.e.hoover(a)wine-staging.com> --- (In reply to Hans Leidekker from comment #12)
... Looks like it falls back to GetExtendedTcpTable though. Does the app really need AllocateAndGetTcpExTableFromStack?
There are probably other apps that were discontinued before Vista that would want the routine. I honestly don't remember what I was testing when I ran into this originally. Unfortunately it wasn't either one of these apps and I didn't add it to the bug :/ -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34372 --- Comment #15 from Hans Leidekker <hans(a)meelstraat.net> --- (In reply to Erich E. Hoover from comment #14)
(In reply to Hans Leidekker from comment #12)
... Looks like it falls back to GetExtendedTcpTable though. Does the app really need AllocateAndGetTcpExTableFromStack?
There are probably other apps that were discontinued before Vista that would want the routine. I honestly don't remember what I was testing when I ran into this originally. Unfortunately it wasn't either one of these apps and I didn't add it to the bug :/
Then let's wait until we find one. Adding this function can cause apps to take a different path on Wine. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34372 André H. <nerv(a)dawncrow.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Staged patchset|https://github.com/wine-com |https://github.com/wine-sta |pholio/wine-staging/tree/ma |ging/wine-staging/tree/mast |ster/patches/iphlpapi-TCP_T |er/patches/iphlpapi-TCP_Tab |able |le -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34372 Marcus Meissner <marcus(a)jet.franken.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |marcus(a)jet.franken.de -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34372 Vijay Kamuju <infyquest(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |infyquest(a)gmail.com --- Comment #16 from Vijay Kamuju <infyquest(a)gmail.com> --- any applications that need this api? I cannot download the application that's specified in this bug. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34372 --- Comment #17 from Ralf Habacker <ralf.habacker(a)freenet.de> --- A portable dbus package could be downloaded from https://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/rhabacker:/branches:/window... The mentioned function is used at https://github.com/d-bus/dbus/blob/master/dbus/dbus-sysdeps-win.c#L109 and following. See https://github.com/d-bus/dbus/commit/2fd9e2c2559991295649635969464772bb6fd1e... for the reason this function has been added. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34372 --- Comment #18 from Ralf Habacker <ralf.habacker(a)freenet.de> --- (In reply to Ralf Habacker from comment #17)
A portable dbus package could be downloaded from https://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/rhabacker:/branches:/ windows:/mingw:/win32/openSUSE_Leap_42.3/noarch/mingw32-dbus-1-portable-1.12. 12.77c650f41.12.10-37.1.noarch.rpm
After unpacking the rpm file with 7z on Windows and opening a command shell, running the command 'qdbus' should trigger the related code (with WINXP SP2 compatibility set) -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34372 Alistair Leslie-Hughes <leslie_alistair(a)hotmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed by SHA1| |05fca48ebc1321984a74ed11dc9 | |c1f13a2cfd1ee Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|STAGED |RESOLVED CC| |leslie_alistair(a)hotmail.com --- Comment #19 from Alistair Leslie-Hughes <leslie_alistair(a)hotmail.com> --- Fixed by https://source.winehq.org/git/wine.git/?a=commit;h=05fca48ebc1321984a74ed11d... -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34372 Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED --- Comment #20 from Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org> --- Closing bugs fixed in 4.8. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
participants (1)
-
wine-bugs＠winehq.org