[Bug 12740] New: Wine won't start (regression against 0.9.59)
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12740 Summary: Wine won't start (regression against 0.9.59) Product: Wine Version: 0.9.60 Platform: PC OS/Version: Solaris Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: blocker Priority: P1 Component: loader AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: petr.sumbera(a)sun.com Created an attachment (id=12395) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=12395) winecfg error output With version 0.9.60, Wine will immediately crash. See attached output from winecfg. Previous version 0.9.59 works just fine. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12740 Petr Sumbera <petr.sumbera(a)sun.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |regression -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12740 Petr Sumbera <petr.sumbera(a)sun.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Wine won't start (regression|Wine tries to execute non- |against 0.9.59) |executable data (regression | |against 0.9.59) --- Comment #1 from Petr Sumbera <petr.sumbera(a)sun.com> 2008-04-22 16:43:50 --- Wine tries to execute non-executable data. As can be seen also from system log: Apr 22 22:53:23 ferrari genunix: [ID 269049 kern.notice] NOTICE: wine[5044] attempt to execute non-executable data at 0x0 by uid xxxx Apr 22 22:53:23 ferrari last message repeated 1 time Apr 22 22:53:23 ferrari genunix: [ID 269049 kern.notice] NOTICE: wine[5033] attempt to execute non-executable data at 0x0 by uid xxxx This is related to libwine as Wine will run when libwine.so.1.0 from version 0.9.59 is preloaded. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12740 --- Comment #2 from Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> 2008-04-22 23:49:37 --- Please run a regression test: http://wiki.winehq.org/RegressionTesting -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12740 Petr Sumbera <petr.sumbera(a)sun.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |slash(a)ma.neweb.ne.jp Component|loader |winex11.drv --- Comment #3 from Petr Sumbera <petr.sumbera(a)sun.com> 2008-04-23 14:54:52 --- I ran regression tests and the winner is... -- 185157cb6eb25bc5e75e9a260b593e98153d2255 is first bad commit commit 185157cb6eb25bc5e75e9a260b593e98153d2255 Author: Kusanagi Kouichi slash at ma.neweb.ne.jp Date: Fri Apr 4 20:44:36 2008 +0900 winex11: Connect to XIM server dynamically. :040000 040000 4df81736d311abdd4b603e64987fb90e4e5c9a71 7999fe03f030755e4e731116a1701b0779e07ab7 M dlls -- Together with following proposed fix: http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2008-April/064839.html -- ...basically it's partly bug against my bad testing (I just verified it builds). -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12740 Marcus Meissner <marcus(a)jet.franken.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |marcus(a)jet.franken.de --- Comment #4 from Marcus Meissner <marcus(a)jet.franken.de> 2008-04-25 09:11:55 --- looks like a NULL ptr jump. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12740 --- Comment #5 from Petr Sumbera <petr.sumbera(a)sun.com> 2008-04-25 12:11:04 --- It's somehow related to using XRegisterIMInstantiateCallback(). Disabling it on following place will make wine (winecfg) start: --- dlls/winex11.drv/xim.c.orig Fri Apr 25 18:51:50 2008 +++ dlls/winex11.drv/xim.c Fri Apr 25 18:52:21 2008 @@ -484,7 +484,7 @@ void X11DRV_SetupXIM(void) { wine_tsx11_lock(); - XRegisterIMInstantiateCallback(thread_display(), NULL, NULL, NULL, X11DRV_OpenIM, NULL); + //XRegisterIMInstantiateCallback(thread_display(), NULL, NULL, NULL, X11DRV_OpenIM, NULL); wine_tsx11_unlock(); } -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12740 Petr Sumbera <petr.sumbera(a)sun.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|blocker |critical --- Comment #6 from Petr Sumbera <petr.sumbera(a)sun.com> 2008-04-28 10:43:40 --- With recent sync to Solaris (build 85) Xlib i18n routines with the community this problem doesn't appear again (Wine is running and XICCallback is defined). See: http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/message.jspa?messageID=228337#228337 But this still should be fixed as Wine should run also on older Solaris versions (Solaris 10, ..). -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12740 --- Comment #7 from Kusanagi Kouichi <slash(a)ma.neweb.ne.jp> 2008-04-29 02:53:57 --- Created an attachment (id=12564) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=12564) patch Does this solve the problem? I wish there were a better solution. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12740 --- Comment #8 from Petr Sumbera <petr.sumbera(a)sun.com> 2008-04-29 14:21:47 --- Hi Kusanagi, I can run Wine with your patch just fine. Not sure what is exact limitation but I think it's the only way how to solve it. Please submit this patch. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12740 Albert Lee <trisk+winehq(a)acm.jhu.edu> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |trisk+winehq(a)acm.jhu.edu --- Comment #9 from Albert Lee <trisk+winehq(a)acm.jhu.edu> 2008-04-29 17:47:32 --- Please see http://www.opensolaris.org/ive/thread.jspa?messageID=229930 for info. The crash is caused by XRegisterIMInstantiateCallback being totally broken. It's fixed in snv_85 because of the new l18n code. A runtime check to revert to immediate XIM should be possible. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12740 --- Comment #10 from Kusanagi Kouichi <slash(a)ma.neweb.ne.jp> 2008-04-30 08:20:21 --- Created an attachment (id=12592) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=12592) runtime check patch This might be wrong or imcomplete. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12740 Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |patch -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12740 --- Comment #11 from Albert Lee <trisk+winehq(a)acm.jhu.edu> 2008-05-01 03:44:50 --- Created an attachment (id=12612) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=12612) Second try at runtime check The runtime check should not assume you run Nevada... I've modified it to use dlsym to check for a symbol I assume might be removed in the new library. I've also added a suggestion for the missing struct definitions (instead of using #define). Unfortunately I don't have an snv_85+ system handy to check on. Someone with snv_85+ or Indiana should make sure nm -g /usr/lib/libX11.so | grep _XInitGenericIM doesn't return anything. http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=58305&tstart=0 (I typoed the previous link) is the thread on xwin-discuss for this problem. I have attached a testcase for the crash there. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12740 Albert Lee <trisk+winehq(a)acm.jhu.edu> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #12612|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #12 from Albert Lee <trisk+winehq(a)acm.jhu.edu> 2008-05-13 20:31:40 --- Created an attachment (id=13040) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=13040) Updated fallback-to-XIM runtime check. Based on the information provided by xsumbe00 on http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?messageID=231794 that patch was the "correct" way to avoid the problem. I've updated it for 1.0-rc1. The same patch is in SFEwine. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12740 --- Comment #13 from Petr Sumbera <petr.sumbera(a)sun.com> 2008-05-14 03:22:02 --- I have filed bug against implementation of XRegisterIMInstantiateCallback in Solaris 10 and 9: http://bugs.opensolaris.org/view_bug.do?bug_id=6698109 If it turns out that it can be fixed in Solaris 10 and 9 I would prefer not to have special patch for this in Wine. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12740 Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED Target Milestone|--- |1.0.1 --- Comment #14 from Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org> 2008-06-21 05:47:13 --- Should be mostly fixed by 5b7bec34c1b550e26744fe632a55e196a751eab4. It will still crash when switching XIMs dynamically but that's probably good enough for now. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12740 Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED --- Comment #15 from Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org> 2008-06-27 10:15:28 --- Closing bugs fixed in 1.1.0. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
participants (1)
-
wine-bugs＠winehq.org