[Bug 47558] New: Ubuntu package for 4.12.1 cannot open project in Adobe Premiere Pro 2.0
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47558 Bug ID: 47558 Summary: Ubuntu package for 4.12.1 cannot open project in Adobe Premiere Pro 2.0 Product: Packaging Version: unspecified Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: wine-packages Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: julius.schwartzenberg(a)gmail.com CC: dimesio(a)earthlink.net, michael(a)fds-team.de, sebastian(a)fds-team.de Distribution: --- Created attachment 64946 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=64946 output of Wine When I run Adobe Premiere Pro 2.0 with Wine 4.12.1 in Ubuntu, I get the following dialog when trying to open a project: Sorry, a serious error has occurred that requires Adobe Premiere Pro to shut down. We will attempt to save your current project. Rebuilding Wine myself from Git, currently the latest commit matches 4.12.1, does not show this problem. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47558 --- Comment #1 from Julius Schwartzenberg <julius.schwartzenberg(a)gmail.com> --- Note that the winehq-stable package with version 4.0.1 does not have this problem. Only with winehq-devel I see this. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47558 --- Comment #2 from Rosanne DiMesio <dimesio(a)earthlink.net> --- Which version of Ubuntu? When you built Wine yourself, was it with MingW support? -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47558 Julius Schwartzenberg <julius.schwartzenberg(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hardware|x86 |x86-64 Distribution|--- |Ubuntu -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47558 --- Comment #3 from Julius Schwartzenberg <julius.schwartzenberg(a)gmail.com> --- Thanks for the quick response! I'm using Ubuntu 18.04 Bionic AMD64. I think the version I built myself used MinGW. I followed the instructions for building on Ubuntu, so I used 'apt build-dep' to get the build dependencies and I think I saw the mingw compilers pass by during the build. Would it make sense to try building without MinGW to see if I can reproduce the problem then? Or maybe there's another build option that the Ubuntu packages use that deviates from what I did now. Another thing to try to narrow it down could be to try other versions of the winehq-devel packages. What do you think would be the easiest? -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47558 --- Comment #4 from Rosanne DiMesio <dimesio(a)earthlink.net> --- The WineHQ packages are built with MingW support. I thought the problem might be related to bug 40350, but if you built Wine with MingW support, you should also see the crash there, too, if that were the cause. Please attach the config.log from your build. Have you tried a clean wineprefix? Unfortunately, there is no legal, free download of Adobe Premiere 2.0, so I can't test this myself. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47558 --- Comment #5 from Julius Schwartzenberg <julius.schwartzenberg(a)gmail.com> --- Created attachment 64959 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=64959 config.log for wine64 -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47558 --- Comment #6 from Julius Schwartzenberg <julius.schwartzenberg(a)gmail.com> --- Created attachment 64960 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=64960 config.log for wine32-tools -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47558 --- Comment #7 from Julius Schwartzenberg <julius.schwartzenberg(a)gmail.com> --- Created attachment 64961 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=64961 config.log for wine32 -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47558 --- Comment #8 from Julius Schwartzenberg <julius.schwartzenberg(a)gmail.com> --- That bug seems to be unrelated. There someone has two variants of the same Windows binary, one compiled with a Microsoft compiler and one with MinGW. They should behave identical, but the MinGW one doesn't work. On the building of Wine side, there would be a choice between GCC and MinGW. MinGW is a variant of GCC that outputs Windows compatible PE binaries instead of ELF binaries. Wine always used it to build the test suite for running on Windows and I think recently I saw more and more parts of Wine itself are being compiled as PEs as well. I have attached the three config.log files from the different builds. I'm using the same wineprefix with both versions and switch back and forth to see it work/break. It appears that only later versions had a trial that can be used everywhere. They behave very differently from this version. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47558 --- Comment #9 from Rosanne DiMesio <dimesio(a)earthlink.net> --- What version of mingw32-gcc did you use to build Wine? -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47558 --- Comment #10 from Julius Schwartzenberg <julius.schwartzenberg(a)gmail.com> --- Everyhing I used for the build is standard Ubuntu 18.04. For MinGW it shows this version: 7.3 (20180312). -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47558 --- Comment #11 from Rosanne DiMesio <dimesio(a)earthlink.net> --- Created attachment 64962 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=64962 OBS bionic i586 4.12.1 build log -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47558 --- Comment #12 from Rosanne DiMesio <dimesio(a)earthlink.net> --- Created attachment 64963 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=64963 OBS x86_64 bionic 4.12.1 build log -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47558 --- Comment #13 from Rosanne DiMesio <dimesio(a)earthlink.net> --- (In reply to Julius Schwartzenberg from comment #10)
Everyhing I used for the build is standard Ubuntu 18.04. For MinGW it shows this version: 7.3 (20180312).
That's what's used in building the packages. I've attached the OBS build logs. One thing I forgot to ask: you reported this for 4.12.1; does that mean the problem did not occur in previous winehq-devel packages? If it did, can you narrow down which package the problem first appeared in? -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47558 --- Comment #14 from Julius Schwartzenberg <julius.schwartzenberg(a)gmail.com> --- I can only say now that with 4.0.1, so winehq-stable, this does not occur. Do you happen to know if there's an easy trick to install older versions of winehq-devel? I'll try those to see how they behave. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47558 --- Comment #15 from Rosanne DiMesio <dimesio(a)earthlink.net> --- You can force a downgrade by specifying the version in the command line, e.g., sudo apt install winehq-devel=4.11~bionic wine-devel=4.11~bionic wine-devel-amd64=4.11~bionic wine-devel-i386=4.11~bionic -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47558 --- Comment #16 from Julius Schwartzenberg <julius.schwartzenberg(a)gmail.com> --- Fantastic, that works great! Much quicker than 'git bisect' to initially narrow something down too!! I found that 4.9 still works, but with 4.10 it broke. At first sight, I do not see any notable differences between the OBS build and the one I did. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47558 --- Comment #17 from Rosanne DiMesio <dimesio(a)earthlink.net> --- (In reply to Julius Schwartzenberg from comment #16)
I found that 4.9 still works, but with 4.10 it broke.
At first sight, I do not see any notable differences between the OBS build and the one I did.
There were no changes to the packaging scripts between 4.9 and 4.10 other than the Wine version. Possibly something changed in Wine that doesn't play well with the OBS build environment, but I have no idea what it might be. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47558 Zebediah Figura <z.figura12(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |z.figura12(a)gmail.com --- Comment #18 from Zebediah Figura <z.figura12(a)gmail.com> --- (In reply to Rosanne DiMesio from comment #17)
(In reply to Julius Schwartzenberg from comment #16)
I found that 4.9 still works, but with 4.10 it broke.
At first sight, I do not see any notable differences between the OBS build and the one I did.
There were no changes to the packaging scripts between 4.9 and 4.10 other than the Wine version. Possibly something changed in Wine that doesn't play well with the OBS build environment, but I have no idea what it might be.
For what it's worth, 4.10 introduced a lot of PE builtin loading code, and initial conversion of builtin DLLs to PE. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47558 --- Comment #19 from Julius Schwartzenberg <julius.schwartzenberg(a)gmail.com> --- I guess there is no way to revert back to ELF for a specific build? It could suggest that the specific MinGW version has become more important. Does Wine have a way built-in to compare two sets of builds? Is the Wine test suite being ran against the Ubuntu builds? If not. Maybe running it against both my build and the Ubuntu build could reveal differences. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47558 --- Comment #20 from Dmitry Timoshkov <dmitry(a)baikal.ru> --- (In reply to Julius Schwartzenberg from comment #19)
I guess there is no way to revert back to ELF for a specific build? It could suggest that the specific MinGW version has become more important. Does Wine have a way built-in to compare two sets of builds?
'configure --without-mingw' makes it possible to build Wine in an old way (without compiling most of dlls as PE binaries). -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47558 --- Comment #21 from Julius Schwartzenberg <julius.schwartzenberg(a)gmail.com> --- I compiled Wine with '--without-mingw', but the resulting build still runs without problems. The latest Ubuntu 4.13 packages still cause a crash. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47558 --- Comment #22 from Rosanne DiMesio <dimesio(a)earthlink.net> --- Is this still an issue with current current Wine? -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47558 Rosanne DiMesio <dimesio(a)earthlink.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEEDINFO Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #23 from Rosanne DiMesio <dimesio(a)earthlink.net> --- Is this still an issue? -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47558 Rosanne DiMesio <dimesio(a)earthlink.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |ABANDONED Status|NEEDINFO |RESOLVED --- Comment #24 from Rosanne DiMesio <dimesio(a)earthlink.net> --- No response in almost two years. Marking abandoned. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47558 Rosanne DiMesio <dimesio(a)earthlink.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED --- Comment #25 from Rosanne DiMesio <dimesio(a)earthlink.net> --- Closing abandoned. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
participants (2)
-
wine-bugs＠winehq.org -
WineHQ Bugzilla