[Bug 55799] New: ws2_32: setsockopt flag IP_RECVIF unimplemented
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55799 Bug ID: 55799 Summary: ws2_32: setsockopt flag IP_RECVIF unimplemented Product: Wine Version: 6.0.3 Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: winsock Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: Littlefighter1996(a)googlemail.com Distribution: --- Created attachment 75287 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=75287 UDP Receive Program Some applications require IP_RECVIF to be set in order to identify the source (IP Address and Interface) from which a message has been received. This flag is not implemented, leading to either termination of the program or unexpected behavior. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55799 --- Comment #1 from Patrick <Littlefighter1996(a)googlemail.com> --- Created attachment 75288 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=75288 UDP Receive Program (Source) -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55799 --- Comment #2 from Patrick <Littlefighter1996(a)googlemail.com> --- Created attachment 75289 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=75289 UDP Send Program -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55799 --- Comment #3 from Patrick <Littlefighter1996(a)googlemail.com> --- Created attachment 75290 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=75290 UDP Send Program (Source) -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55799 temp82(a)luukku.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |temp82(a)luukku.com --- Comment #4 from temp82(a)luukku.com --- are you really using so old wine version? bugs should be reported against the latest development version of wine so fixes would land into future stable versions. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55799 Zeb Figura <z.figura12(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |z.figura12(a)gmail.com --- Comment #5 from Zeb Figura <z.figura12(a)gmail.com> --- (In reply to temp82 from comment #4)
are you really using so old wine version? bugs should be reported against the latest development version of wine so fixes would land into future stable versions.
True, but IP_RECVIF still isn't implemented, so it's not a big deal. I don't suppose you can give the name of a real application affected by this? -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55799 --- Comment #6 from Patrick <Littlefighter1996(a)googlemail.com> --- (In reply to Zeb Figura from comment #5)
(In reply to temp82 from comment #4)
are you really using so old wine version? bugs should be reported against the latest development version of wine so fixes would land into future stable versions.
True, but IP_RECVIF still isn't implemented, so it's not a big deal.
I don't suppose you can give the name of a real application affected by this?
I would have to ask my boss first. (The application is still intended to be open-source, yet no final build has been released) It's a server application, which answers broadcasts of clients and sends them the info required to connect. (Think of it like a Quake lobby) To provide the appropriate IP address to the client on multi-network-adapter setups, it's necessary to perform a lookup. I've noticed this during development on a Ubuntu (22.04) machine. (Which is running this old version of Wine). For now, I can work around this, by using IP_PKTINFO and extracting the interface number from there, instead. This seems to work out just fine as a replacement. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55799 Patrick <Littlefighter1996(a)googlemail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #75288|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #7 from Patrick <Littlefighter1996(a)googlemail.com> --- Created attachment 75315 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=75315 UDP Receive Program (Source) -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55799 Patrick <Littlefighter1996(a)googlemail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #75287|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #8 from Patrick <Littlefighter1996(a)googlemail.com> --- Created attachment 75316 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=75316 UDP Receive Program -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55799 --- Comment #9 from Zeb Figura <z.figura12(a)gmail.com> --- (In reply to Patrick from comment #6)
(In reply to Zeb Figura from comment #5)
(In reply to temp82 from comment #4)
are you really using so old wine version? bugs should be reported against the latest development version of wine so fixes would land into future stable versions.
True, but IP_RECVIF still isn't implemented, so it's not a big deal.
I don't suppose you can give the name of a real application affected by this?
I would have to ask my boss first. (The application is still intended to be open-source, yet no final build has been released)
Understandable, we just like traceability where possible. (Though, if it's your own application, and you've already modified it to use IP_PKTINFO, should we still keep this open?) -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55799 Patrick <Littlefighter1996(a)googlemail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |ABANDONED Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED --- Comment #10 from Patrick <Littlefighter1996(a)googlemail.com> --- I'm sorry, I forgot to respond. Yes, we already have said workaround in place for the Wine version. So this issue could be closed. If interest is still there, it appears I can upload the server binary, but not the client binary. (Thus rendering it useless in my opinion). I just wanted to have this mentioned on the tracker, in case someone else stumbles across that issue, when using similar software. (I'm thinking more like if some early 2000's game doesn't have a working multiplayer lobby and seeing this line, it would be very indicative of what's going wrong). Otherwise, this bug is not bugging me anymore ;) -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55799 Ken Sharp <imwellcushtymelike(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|ABANDONED |--- Status|RESOLVED |UNCONFIRMED --- Comment #11 from Ken Sharp <imwellcushtymelike(a)gmail.com> --- Nothing has been fixed. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55799 Ken Sharp <imwellcushtymelike(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |ABANDONED --- Comment #12 from Ken Sharp <imwellcushtymelike(a)gmail.com> --- Ignore me, I'm an idiot. Please reopen if someone can help further. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55799 Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED --- Comment #13 from Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> --- Closing. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
participants (1)
-
WineHQ Bugzilla