[Bug 23235] New: If Xserver does not suppoer MIT-SHM, log get spammed
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23235 Summary: If Xserver does not suppoer MIT-SHM, log get spammed Product: Wine Version: unspecified Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: winex11.drv AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: atari(a)gabo.pl If Xserver does not support MIT-SHM extension, log is spammed with a lot of Xlib: extension "MIT-SHM" missing on display "localhost:11.0". messages. It would be better if such message would appear only once. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23235 Dmitry Timoshkov <dmitry(a)codeweavers.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|unspecified |1.2-rc3 Severity|normal |enhancement -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23235 Vitaliy Margolen <vitaliy(a)kievinfo.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution| |INVALID --- Comment #1 from Vitaliy Margolen <vitaliy(a)kievinfo.com> 2010-06-18 08:52:41 --- Wine doesn't print this message - xlib does. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23235 Vitaliy Margolen <vitaliy(a)kievinfo.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED Component|winex11.drv |-unknown --- Comment #2 from Vitaliy Margolen <vitaliy(a)kievinfo.com> 2010-06-18 08:53:00 --- Closing invalid - not Wine bug. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23235 --- Comment #3 from Adam Klobukowski <adamklobukowski(a)gmail.com> 2010-06-18 13:52:35 --- Can't Wine tell xlib not to try to use MIT-SHM if it isn't available? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23235 --- Comment #4 from Dmitry Timoshkov <dmitry(a)codeweavers.com> 2010-06-19 00:13:49 --- (In reply to comment #3)
Can't Wine tell xlib not to try to use MIT-SHM if it isn't available?
Wine doesn't use XSHM when it's not available, probably XLib prints the warning when Wine just queries for that extension. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23235 --- Comment #5 from Adam Klobukowski <adamklobukowski(a)gmail.com> 2010-06-19 00:59:04 --- Then, wine should not query for it over and over - it will not appear after it was missing the first time :) -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23235 --- Comment #6 from Dmitry Timoshkov <dmitry(a)codeweavers.com> 2010-06-19 22:45:31 --- (In reply to comment #5)
Then, wine should not query for it over and over - it will not appear after it was missing the first time :)
It's ridiculous to print loud warnings in the first place when someone just queries for a feature. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23235 Kenneth Robinette <support(a)securenetterm.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |support(a)securenetterm.com --- Comment #7 from Kenneth Robinette <support(a)securenetterm.com> 2011-01-30 09:53:47 CST --- (In reply to comment #6)
(In reply to comment #5)
Then, wine should not query for it over and over - it will not appear after it was missing the first time :) It's ridiculous to print loud warnings in the first place when someone just queries for a feature.
Ah, the dictators at WINE speaks again. A user reports a problem, and they are ignored. Case closed, not a WINE problem. Really? Why not look at the problem report and help resolve it. I see the same thing, and if you take a few nanoseconds and do a web search, you will find that this has been around for years. The only way you can get rid of the thousands of messages flooding the network regarding the MIT_XSHM not supported message is to configure WINE with: configure --without-xshm Who cares whether is ridiculous for X-11 to keep printing the message. The point is, it does. Every program/system involved in this reports back to WINE that the option MIT-XSHM is NOT SUPPORTED, yet the messages continue to flow. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23235 --- Comment #8 from Henri Verbeet <hverbeet(a)gmail.com> 2011-01-30 10:42:19 CST --- Created an attachment (id=33058) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=33058) patch It should be trivial to query for the extension only during initialization, the attached patch should be enough. I'm not sure I'm convinced this is really worth changing though. (In reply to comment #7)
Ah, the dictators at WINE speaks again. A user reports a problem, and they are ignored. Case closed, not a WINE problem. Really? Why not look at the problem report and help resolve it.
Please go troll somewhere else, it's very unhelpful. Besides, bug trackers are for technical discussion, blogs are for trolling. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23235 --- Comment #9 from Kenneth Robinette <support(a)securenetterm.com> 2011-02-01 11:11:44 CST --- (In reply to comment #8)
Created an attachment (id=33058) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=33058) [details] patch It should be trivial to query for the extension only during initialization, the attached patch should be enough. I'm not sure I'm convinced this is really worth changing though. (In reply to comment #7)
Ah, the dictators at WINE speaks again. A user reports a problem, and they are ignored. Case closed, not a WINE problem. Really? Why not look at the problem report and help resolve it.
Please go troll somewhere else, it's very unhelpful. Besides, bug trackers are for technical discussion, blogs are for trolling.
I was not trolling, and this is a technical discussion. When a subsystem such as wine send thousands of needless messages over a network, network admin people tend to get very upset, as they should. I tested your patch with the latest wine git and am happy to report that it fixed the problem. Now all wine based programs run much faster when using X11 remotely and all the needless WINE messages are gone. Thank you. Will look forward to seeing this fixed in the next wine-1.3.13 version. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23235 --- Comment #10 from Henri Verbeet <hverbeet(a)gmail.com> 2011-02-01 11:29:17 CST --- (In reply to comment #9)
I was not trolling, and this is a technical discussion. When a subsystem such as wine send thousands of needless messages over a network, network admin people tend to get very upset, as they should.
I think the amount of network traffic generated by the queries would be insignificant compared to the actual bitmap data. Regardless, that's still basically an Xlib issue, afaik there's no reason for Xlib to ask the server or to print that message after the first time for each connection. (And so far I haven't actually seen any evidence it does communicate with the server for each query.) -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23235 --- Comment #11 from Kenneth Robinette <support(a)securenetterm.com> 2011-02-01 11:37:00 CST --- (In reply to comment #10)
(In reply to comment #9)
I was not trolling, and this is a technical discussion. When a subsystem such as wine send thousands of needless messages over a network, network admin people tend to get very upset, as they should.
I think the amount of network traffic generated by the queries would be insignificant compared to the actual bitmap data. Regardless, that's still basically an Xlib issue, afaik there's no reason for Xlib to ask the server or to print that message after the first time for each connection. (And so far I haven't actually seen any evidence it does communicate with the server for each query.)
Could be. All I know is if you configure WINE with --without-xshm the problem goes away (a fix suggested by someone at codeweavers). I can submit a problem report to Apple, but figure they would just laugh. So I guess we are stuck with the --without-xshm solution. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23235 Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |RESOLVED Resolution|INVALID |FIXED --- Comment #12 from Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> 2011-02-02 12:59:21 CST --- Fixed by http://source.winehq.org/git/wine.git/?a=commitdiff;h=b44bdfd20a4d025483d1bd... -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23235 Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED --- Comment #13 from Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org> 2011-02-04 13:20:37 CST --- Closing bugs fixed in 1.3.13. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23235 Anastasius Focht <focht(a)gmx.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|-unknown |winex11.drv CC| |focht(a)gmx.net Fixed by SHA1| |b44bdfd20a4d025483d1bd5bdbf | |a1f7b829055f1 -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
participants (1)
-
wine-bugs＠winehq.org