http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8514 ------- Additional Comments From citizenr(a)gmail.com 2007-09-06 03:45 ------- I just did git fetch and noticed this in the sock.c code /* test getsockname() to get peer's port */ ss = sizeof ( peer[i].addr ); ok ( getsockname ( peer[i].s, (struct sockaddr *) &peer[i].addr, &ss ) != SOCKET_ERROR, "UDP: could not getsockname()\n" ); ok ( peer[i].addr.sin_port != htons ( 0 ), "UDP: bind() did not associate port\n" ); } /* test getsockname() */ ok ( peer[0].addr.sin_port == htons ( SERVERPORT ), "UDP: getsockname returned incorrect peer port\n" ); is second ok () is using the buggy wine behaviour? and if yes then why? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
participants (1)
-
Wine Bugs