[Bug 36599] New: winhttp/winhttp.c test fails under valgrind
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36599 Bug ID: 36599 Summary: winhttp/winhttp.c test fails under valgrind Product: Wine Version: 1.7.19 Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: download, source, testcase Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: winhttp Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: austinenglish(a)gmail.com ../../../tools/runtest -q -P wine -T ../../.. -M winhttp.dll -p winhttp_test.exe.so winhttp && touch winhttp.ok preloader: Warning: failed to reserve range 00110000-68000000 preloader: Warning: failed to reserve range 7f000000-82000000 fixme:winhttp:request_query_option partial stub winhttp.c:879: Test failed: failed to receive response 12152 winhttp.c:883: Test failed: failed unexpectedly 12150 winhttp.c:884: Test failed: request failed unexpectedly 122 winhttp.c:899: Test failed: read_size = 0 causing a lot of valgrind warnings about uninitialized values in winetest_ok/etc. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36599 Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|winhttp/winhttp.c test |winhttp/tests/winhttp.c: |fails under valgrind |test_secure_connection() | |fails under valgrind -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36599 Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |valgrind -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36599 --- Comment #1 from Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> --- Still in 1.7.41. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36599 --- Comment #2 from Hans Leidekker <hans(a)meelstraat.net> --- This might be a problem with gnutls: ==29760== ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 7 from 7) ==29749== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s) ==29749== at 0x61CE0A7: ??? (in /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libgcrypt.so.11.8.3) ==29749== by 0x617C077: gcry_mpi_print (in /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libgcrypt.so.11.8.3) ==29749== by 0x5F26E65: ??? (in /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libgnutls.so.26.22.6) ==29749== by 0x5ED152C: ??? (in /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libgnutls.so.26.22.6) ==29749== by 0x5ED180D: ??? (in /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libgnutls.so.26.22.6) ==29749== by 0x5EB4B25: ??? (in /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libgnutls.so.26.22.6) ==29749== by 0x5EB14D3: ??? (in /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libgnutls.so.26.22.6) ==29749== by 0x5EB1EF0: gnutls_handshake (in /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libgnutls.so.26.22.6) ==29749== by 0x5D30F26: schan_imp_handshake (schannel_gnutls.c:200) ==29749== by 0x5D2F654: schan_InitializeSecurityContextW (schannel.c:893) ==29749== by 0x5D3616C: InitializeSecurityContextW (wrapper.c:346) ==29749== by 0x4E95BAE: netconn_secure_connect (net.c:478) ==29749== by 0x4E9EA75: open_connection (request.c:1064) ==29749== by 0x4E9FBED: send_request (request.c:1185) ==29749== by 0x4EA124C: WinHttpSendRequest (request.c:1272) ==29749== by 0x4D68D6A: test_secure_connection (winhttp.c:858) ==29749== by 0x4D68D6A: func_winhttp (???:0) ==29749== by 0x4D57F28: main (test.h:584) ==29749== Uninitialised value was created by a stack allocation ==29749== at 0x5ED14AF: ??? (in /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libgnutls.so.26.22.6) -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36599 --- Comment #3 from Hans Leidekker <hans(a)meelstraat.net> --- Tests pass here under valgrind. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36599 Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW |RESOLVED --- Comment #4 from Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> --- (In reply to Hans Leidekker from comment #3)
Tests pass here under valgrind.
Here as well in wine-2.3-135-gfaa6ff5 -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36599 Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED --- Comment #5 from Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org> --- Closing bugs fixed in 2.4. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
participants (1)
-
wine-bugs＠winehq.org