[Bug 56977] New: accept()-ed socket fds are never marked as cacheable

[WineHQ Bugzilla]

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56977

            Bug ID: 56977
           Summary: accept()-ed socket fds are never marked as cacheable
           Product: Wine
           Version: 9.13
          Hardware: x86-64
                OS: Linux
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: wineserver
          Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org
          Reporter: jinoh.kang.kr(a)gmail.com
                CC: ishitatsuyuki(a)gmail.com, z.figura12(a)gmail.com
   Regression SHA1: 89f77a93a6c96896d90c943bc3e82139114cf58c
      Distribution: ---

allow_fd_caching() is not called for accept()-ed sockets, causing severe
performance degradation due to extra server_get_unix_fd() call overhead per
every socket I/O operation.

Affected applications:

- DJMAX RESPECT V creates a loopback TCP socket pair. The "server" side
ESTABLISHED socket is affected.

-- 
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.

[Bug 56977] accept()-ed socket fds are never marked as cacheable

[WineHQ Bugzilla]

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56977

--- Comment #1 from Jinoh Kang <jinoh.kang.kr(a)gmail.com> ---
Fix submitted

- https://gitlab.winehq.org/wine/wine/-/merge_requests/6094

-- 
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.

[Bug 56977] accept()-ed socket fds are never marked as cacheable

[WineHQ Bugzilla]

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56977

Jinoh Kang <jinoh.kang.kr(a)gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED
      Fixed by SHA1|                            |863f12c329fe3fe5285957e2344
                   |                            |6887d85e111c5

--- Comment #2 from Jinoh Kang <jinoh.kang.kr(a)gmail.com> ---
Fixed in 863f12c329fe3fe5285957e23446887d85e111c5.

-- 
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.

[Bug 56977] accept()-ed socket fds are never marked as cacheable

[WineHQ Bugzilla]

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56977

Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |CLOSED

--- Comment #3 from Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org> ---
Closing bugs fixed in 9.14.

-- 
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.