[Bug 12516] New: err:dosmem:setup_dos_mem error report on every run of Wine
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12516 Summary: err:dosmem:setup_dos_mem error report on every run of Wine Product: Wine Version: unspecified Platform: PC OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: michael(a)araneidae.co.uk Every run of wine on my system (including wineprefixcreate on a freshly created prefix directory) produces the following messages several times: preloader: Warning: failed to reserve range 00000000-60000000 err:dosmem:setup_dos_mem Cannot use first megabyte for DOS address space, please report As the message requests, I am reporting it. This is running Ubuntu Hardy Heron beta with wine version 0.9.59, or as it reports it: $ wine --version preloader: Warning: failed to reserve range 00000000-60000000 wine-0.9.59 $ -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12516 Hans Leidekker <hans(a)it.vu.nl> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |hans(a)it.vu.nl --- Comment #1 from Hans Leidekker <hans(a)it.vu.nl> 2008-04-12 09:07:17 --- I'm seeing the same thing on recent Fedora kernels. This command works around the problem: $ sudo sysctl -w vm.mmap_min_addr=0 To make this setting permanent, add this line to /etc/sysctl.conf: vm.mmap_min_addr=0 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12516 --- Comment #2 from Michael Abbott <michael(a)araneidae.co.uk> 2008-04-12 10:31:16 ---
$ sudo sysctl -w vm.mmap_min_addr=0
To make this setting permanent, add this line to /etc/sysctl.conf: vm.mmap_min_addr=0
That's very helpful. I think this page http://www.linuxinsight.com/proc_sys_vm_mmap_min_addr.html explains the logic of this setting and probably why it's changed recently. Of course, this means that the message from Wine needs to change. Presumably if it's really a problem then it actually needs to be fixed by the user (or the wine install? ... probably a bad idea). -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12516 --- Comment #3 from Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> 2008-04-12 22:58:49 --- (In reply to comment #2)
$ sudo sysctl -w vm.mmap_min_addr=0
To make this setting permanent, add this line to /etc/sysctl.conf: vm.mmap_min_addr=0
That's very helpful. I think this page http://www.linuxinsight.com/proc_sys_vm_mmap_min_addr.html explains the logic of this setting and probably why it's changed recently.
Of course, this means that the message from Wine needs to change. Presumably if it's really a problem then it actually needs to be fixed by the user (or the wine install? ... probably a bad idea).
I sent a patch to wine-patches: http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2008-April/053264.html -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12516 --- Comment #4 from Michael Abbott <michael(a)araneidae.co.uk> 2008-04-13 02:19:02 ---
http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2008-April/053264.html
The problem with the message in this patch is that it doesn't give the user much help: the key is of course to look in /proc/sys/vm/mmap_min_addr -- I mean, what is the poor user who doesn't already know the answer to do? I'd suggest changing the text "edit /etc/sysctl.conf" to the more helpful "add the line vm.mmap_min_addr=0 to /etc/sysctl.conf". Any chance of somebody marking this as CONFIRMED?! -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12516 Dmitry Timoshkov <dmitry(a)codeweavers.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #5 from Dmitry Timoshkov <dmitry(a)codeweavers.com> 2008-04-13 05:51:02 --- Confirming. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12516 Dan Kegel <dank(a)kegel.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dank(a)kegel.com --- Comment #6 from Dan Kegel <dank(a)kegel.com> 2008-04-13 09:44:57 --- *** Bug 12548 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12516 --- Comment #7 from Dan Kegel <dank(a)kegel.com> 2008-04-13 16:23:34 --- For completeness, here's the summary I wrote in the dup bug: The problem http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2008-0600 prompted distributions to raise the default for /proc/sys/vm/mmap_min_addr or even DEFAULT_MMAP_MIN_ADDR to 64K from 0. This causes the following error message when starting (some?) wine apps: Problem with wine preloader: Warning: failed to reserve range 00000000-60000000 See discussion: https://launchpad.net/bugs/114025 http://kerneltrap.org/Linux/Patching_CVE-2008-0600_Local_Root_Exploit http://kerneltrap.org/Linux/2.4.36_Stable_Release You can check to see if you're on an affected system by doing "cat /proc/sys/vm/mmap_min". If that succeeds, and its value is nonzero, you're probably running into this. To work around the problem temporarily, you can change this value with the command sudo sysctl -w vm.mmap_min_addr=0 but that value gets reset at boot. To work around the problem more persistantly, also edit the file /etc/sysctl.conf like this: # protect bottom 64k of memory from mmap to prevent NULL-dereference # attacks against potential future kernel security vulnerabilities. # (Added in kernel 2.6.23.) -vm.mmap_min_addr = 65536 +vm.mmap_min_addr = 0 http://kerneltrap.org/Linux/2.4.36_Stable_Release suggests using a value of 4096 for this. "Advanced Windows", 3rd edition, says that the memory area 0 to 4095 is not mapped anyway in windows (it's a guard page). So maybe when Wine is installed, we could somehow change that value to 4096, and have Wine's preloader happily continue if it can't map the bottom page of RAM. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12516 --- Comment #8 from Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> 2008-04-14 22:12:04 --- Alexandre committed a fix today, which makes some progress: preloader: Warning: failed to reserve range 00000000-00010000 http://source.winehq.org/git/wine.git/?a=commitdiff;h=f02ef19fdbf5d7396f7143... http://source.winehq.org/git/wine.git/?a=commitdiff;h=195ca1e85f01ac40695fbb... http://source.winehq.org/git/wine.git/?a=commitdiff;h=16e8633ee597c68336bc1b... -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12516 Dan Kegel <dank(a)kegel.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |12592 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12516 variant <mrintegrity(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mrintegrity(a)gmail.com --- Comment #9 from variant <mrintegrity(a)gmail.com> 2008-04-16 08:51:43 --- Hi,
You can check to see if you're on an affected system by doing "cat /proc/sys/vm/mmap_min". If that succeeds, and its value is nonzero, you're probably running into this.
I think you mean "cat /proc/sys/vm/mmap_min_addr" as vm/mmap_min will never exist :P -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12516 Dmitry Timoshkov <dmitry(a)codeweavers.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jens(a)porup.com --- Comment #10 from Dmitry Timoshkov <dmitry(a)codeweavers.com> 2008-04-18 20:37:11 --- *** Bug 12645 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12516 Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |groogyboy(a)msn.com --- Comment #11 from Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> 2008-04-22 23:42:42 --- *** Bug 12746 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12516 --- Comment #12 from Dan Kegel <dank(a)kegel.com> 2008-04-25 09:16:34 --- The URL to send users to for explanations about this is http://wiki.winehq.org/PreloaderPageZeroProblem -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12516 Lei Zhang <thestig(a)google.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |randy.a.ross(a)gmail.com --- Comment #13 from Lei Zhang <thestig(a)google.com> 2008-04-25 15:29:12 --- *** Bug 12797 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12516 Dan Kegel <dank(a)kegel.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |thomas(a)tgohome.com --- Comment #14 from Dan Kegel <dank(a)kegel.com> 2008-04-26 22:43:20 --- *** Bug 12815 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12516 Dmitry Timoshkov <dmitry(a)codeweavers.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |gui.simon(a)gmail.com --- Comment #15 from Dmitry Timoshkov <dmitry(a)codeweavers.com> 2008-04-29 00:55:14 --- *** Bug 12847 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12516 James Gregory <jgxenite(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jgxenite(a)gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12516 Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |terryphillips(a)radical.org.uk --- Comment #16 from Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org> 2008-04-30 11:12:26 --- *** Bug 12867 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12516 Korn <wine(a)temporaryforwarding.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |wine(a)temporaryforwarding.com --- Comment #17 from Korn <wine(a)temporaryforwarding.com> 2008-05-04 10:59:56 --- Will there be a fix for this in wine? I do not like the option to open "potential future kernel security vulnerabilities". -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12516 --- Comment #18 from Dan Kegel <dank(a)kegel.com> 2008-05-04 11:46:49 --- It's possible we could avoid mapping the very lowest page (I've read Windows does this); that would make the workaround be a little less insecure. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12516 --- Comment #19 from Dmitry Timoshkov <dmitry(a)codeweavers.com> 2008-05-04 21:52:02 --- (In reply to comment #17)
Will there be a fix for this in wine?
The fix is already in Wine since version 0.9.60.
I do not like the option to open "potential future kernel security vulnerabilities".
In the most cases there is no potential security problems, there are speculations about them. In this case not mapping a zero page can potentially increase security for 0.001% applications, which are so buggy, that nobody would use them anyway. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12516 --- Comment #20 from Korn <wine(a)temporaryforwarding.com> 2008-05-05 02:11:48 --- (In reply to comment #19)
(In reply to comment #17)
Will there be a fix for this in wine? The fix is already in Wine since version 0.9.60. I use version 0.9.61 on Ubuntu 8.04 and still run into the error: preloader: Warning: failed to reserve range 00000000-00010000
-- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12516 --- Comment #22 from Dmitry Timoshkov <dmitry(a)codeweavers.com> 2008-05-05 03:31:13 --- (In reply to comment #20)
I use version 0.9.61 on Ubuntu 8.04 and still run into the error: preloader: Warning: failed to reserve range 00000000-00010000
That's not an error, just a warning. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12516 --- Comment #23 from James Gregory <jgxenite(a)gmail.com> 2008-05-05 03:34:40 --- For a warning, it seems pretty fatal to me when I tried to run Tomb Raider Legend and Tomb Raider Anniversary. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12516 Dmitry Timoshkov <dmitry(a)codeweavers.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pdluke(a)freenet.de --- Comment #24 from Dmitry Timoshkov <dmitry(a)codeweavers.com> 2008-05-05 03:46:46 --- *** Bug 8534 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12516 --- Comment #25 from Dan Kegel <dank(a)kegel.com> 2008-05-05 08:54:49 --- If you can build from source, try building current git; http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-cvs/2008-May/043321.html might help. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12516 Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bammzilla(a)gabriana.com --- Comment #26 from Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org> 2008-05-07 07:49:03 --- *** Bug 13041 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12516 Dmitry Timoshkov <dmitry(a)codeweavers.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ryan(a)ryantm.com --- Comment #27 from Dmitry Timoshkov <dmitry(a)codeweavers.com> 2008-05-07 09:11:31 --- *** Bug 13043 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12516 Vitaliy Margolen <vitaliy(a)kievinfo.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mccue(a)caltech.edu --- Comment #28 from Vitaliy Margolen <vitaliy(a)kievinfo.com> 2008-05-10 22:01:08 --- *** Bug 13123 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12516 Ilya Chernykh <neptunia(a)mail.ru> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |neptunia(a)mail.ru --- Comment #29 from Ilya Chernykh <neptunia(a)mail.ru> 2008-05-18 08:11:47 --- The workaround does not work in FC9. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12516 mback <mback(a)yahoo.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mback(a)yahoo.com --- Comment #30 from mback <mback(a)yahoo.com> 2008-05-18 21:17:02 --- $ wine --version preloader: Warning: failed to reserve range 00000000-60000000 wine-0.9.59 $ -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12516 --- Comment #31 from Dmitry Timoshkov <dmitry(a)codeweavers.com> 2008-05-18 21:23:09 --- (In reply to comment #30)
$ wine --version preloader: Warning: failed to reserve range 00000000-60000000 wine-0.9.59
Your Wine version is too old, current release is rc1. If you would carefully read the comments in this bug I'd notice that. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12516 --- Comment #32 from Ilya Chernykh <neptunia(a)mail.ru> 2008-05-18 21:31:05 --- Where to get Wine newer than 0.9.58 for Fedora Core 9 or newer than 0.9.59 for Ubuntu 7.10? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12516 --- Comment #33 from Dmitry Timoshkov <dmitry(a)codeweavers.com> 2008-05-18 22:27:54 --- (In reply to comment #32)
Where to get Wine newer than 0.9.58 for Fedora Core 9 or newer than 0.9.59 for Ubuntu 7.10?
Ask that question on the support list of your distribution. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12516 Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rigper(a)gmail.com --- Comment #34 from Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org> 2008-05-27 03:57:27 --- *** Bug 13454 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12516 Dmitry Timoshkov <dmitry(a)codeweavers.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jaysonsantos2003(a)yahoo.com.b | |r --- Comment #35 from Dmitry Timoshkov <dmitry(a)codeweavers.com> 2008-05-27 05:53:45 --- *** Bug 13444 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12516 Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |uwe.koch(a)opticakoch.cl --- Comment #36 from Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> 2008-06-03 18:18:54 --- *** Bug 13668 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12516 shakaran <shakaran(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |shakaran(a)gmail.com --- Comment #37 from shakaran <shakaran(a)gmail.com> 2008-06-03 19:53:21 --- In rc1, rc2 and rc3 I have not seen this problem in ubuntu 8.04. I think that this solved. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12516 --- Comment #38 from Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> 2008-06-03 20:01:14 --- (In reply to comment #37)
In rc1, rc2 and rc3 I have not seen this problem in ubuntu 8.04. I think that this solved.
Fixes have been put in for most apps, but some dos/win16 apps still trigger it. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12516 Kevin DeKorte <kdekorte(a)yahoo.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kdekorte(a)yahoo.com --- Comment #39 from Kevin DeKorte <kdekorte(a)yahoo.com> 2008-06-08 08:59:15 --- The problem now affects wine on Fedora 8. And picasa 2.7.3736-15 triggers the warning message. The work around for mmap_min_addr does work. Just annoying to have wine working correctly and then to have it break. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12516 --- Comment #40 from Ilya Chernykh <neptunia(a)mail.ru> 2008-06-08 09:40:48 --- Civilization I for Windows hangs on startup. The game shows splash screen and plays intro music, but does not react on mouse clicks (normally mouse click should skip intro). After music is over, the game simply stucks with its splash screen window still displayed. In console it displays an error message: wine: Unhandled page fault on read access to 0x0000000c at address 0x605ad6ae (thread 0019), starting debugger... Unhandled exception: page fault on read access to 0x0000000c in 32-bit code (0x605ad6ae). The game ran well under Wine 1.0-rc1 after the mmap_min_addr workaround (although with some minor bugs) on the same system, so this bug is either because of post-rc1 changes or because of Fedora 9 post-release updates (regression testing did not help, the bug was present in all test attempts). Under Ubuntu 8.04 with Wine 1.0-rc4 also works well. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12516 krasmussen(a)gmail.com <krasmussen(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |krasmussen(a)gmail.com --- Comment #41 from krasmussen(a)gmail.com 2008-06-11 09:28:05 --- I've applied the vm.mmap_min_addr fix, but after the update my dictionary (Gyldendals Danish-English) now crashes with this - I'm guessing its related to this bug (full log attached): wine: Unhandled page fault on read access to 0xffffffff at address 0x12cf:0x0000143c (thread 0031), starting debugger... Unhandled exception: page fault on read access to 0xffffffff in 16-bit code (12cf:143c). -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12516 --- Comment #42 from Dan Kegel <dank(a)kegel.com> 2008-06-11 10:18:19 --- Nah, that looks like a different problem, please create a new bug for it. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12516 Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |danebigh(a)aol.com --- Comment #43 from Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org> 2008-07-10 03:25:19 --- *** Bug 14396 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12516 --- Comment #44 from Brian Walker <fdwalkhome(a)hotmail.com> 2008-07-10 11:08:33 --- Re: Comment #373 and #38: I did encounter this error in Ubuntu 8.04 Hardy, running any command thusfar. Comment #1 seems to resolve: $ sudo sysctl -w vm.mmap_min_addr=0 To make this setting permanent, add this line to /etc/sysctl.conf: vm.mmap_min_addr -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12516 Scott Ritchie <scott(a)open-vote.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |scott(a)open-vote.org --- Comment #45 from Scott Ritchie <scott(a)open-vote.org> 2008-08-08 07:52:11 --- Distro packagers should have a new way to workaround this problem if their system is using the newest procps. You can place your own custom file to override /etc/sysctl.conf settings in /etc/sysctl.d/ So, here we put a small file containing: vm.mmap_min_addr = 0 The problem, however, is that this exposes a bug in sysctl - namely, it loads the /etc/sysctl.d/ folder BEFORE /etc/sysctl.conf, making the new folder useless. Hopefully this will be fixed soon: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/procps/+bug/256025 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12516 Jeremiah Flerchinger <flerchjj(a)ieee.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |flerchjj(a)ieee.org -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12516 --- Comment #46 from Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> 2008-10-06 16:56:39 --- What's the current status of this bug? Haven't heard much about it lately... -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12516 --- Comment #47 from Jeremiah Flerchinger <flerchjj(a)ieee.org> 2008-10-06 21:45:21 --- I don't experience this error with every run of Wine (nor have I ever). Still I encountered the "Preloader Page Zero Problem" on some apps. The issue may relate to DOS, Win3.1, or Win98 apps that try to access VGA directly. I am using Ubuntu 8.04 and running "sudo sysctl -w vm.mmap_min_addr=0" still corrects the issue after any restart. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12516 --- Comment #48 from Dmitry Timoshkov <dmitry(a)codeweavers.com> 2008-10-06 21:49:59 --- (In reply to comment #47)
I don't experience this error with every run of Wine (nor have I ever). Still I encountered the "Preloader Page Zero Problem" on some apps. The issue may relate to DOS, Win3.1, or Win98 apps that try to access VGA directly.
And Wine can do nothing about this.
I am using Ubuntu 8.04 and running "sudo sysctl -w vm.mmap_min_addr=0" still corrects the issue after any restart.
That's the only way to fix it, in order to avoid doing this after a restart follow the suggestion in the comments above. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12516 --- Comment #49 from Jeremiah Flerchinger <flerchjj(a)ieee.org> 2008-10-06 22:13:31 ---
And Wine can do nothing about this. I didn't say Wine could or should. I was just replying to Austin that the condition still exists.
It is not a big concern of mine, just a minor annoyance and possibly a concern for individuals unaware of the issue or how to work around it. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12516 Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |INVALID --- Comment #50 from Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> 2009-04-17 12:13:00 --- This doesn't show up too much anymore, and for the few times it's needed, it's not a Wine bug. Marking invalid. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12516 Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |INVALID Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED --- Comment #50 from Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> 2009-04-17 12:13:00 --- This doesn't show up too much anymore, and for the few times it's needed, it's not a Wine bug. Marking invalid. --- Comment #51 from Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> 2009-04-17 14:30:42 --- Closing. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12516 Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |INVALID Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED --- Comment #50 from Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> 2009-04-17 12:13:00 --- This doesn't show up too much anymore, and for the few times it's needed, it's not a Wine bug. Marking invalid. --- Comment #51 from Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> 2009-04-17 14:30:42 --- Closing. --- Comment #52 from Scott Ritchie <scott(a)open-vote.org> 2009-04-17 14:52:09 --- Wouldn't Wine, in an ideal world, be able to run these applications even with the memory restrictions? I could be wrong, but I thought Dosbox manages to do it somehow. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12516 Vincent Povirk <madewokherd(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |madewokherd(a)gmail.com --- Comment #53 from Vincent Povirk <madewokherd(a)gmail.com> 2009-04-17 16:21:28 --- (In reply to comment #52)
Wouldn't Wine, in an ideal world, be able to run these applications even with the memory restrictions? I could be wrong, but I thought Dosbox manages to do it somehow.
DOSBox does CPU emulation so its own memory layout isn't essential. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12516 Vincent Povirk <madewokherd(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |madewokherd(a)gmail.com Dmitry Timoshkov <dmitry(a)codeweavers.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |wouter.j(a)zonnet.nl --- Comment #53 from Vincent Povirk <madewokherd(a)gmail.com> 2009-04-17 16:21:28 --- (In reply to comment #52)
Wouldn't Wine, in an ideal world, be able to run these applications even with the memory restrictions? I could be wrong, but I thought Dosbox manages to do it somehow.
DOSBox does CPU emulation so its own memory layout isn't essential. --- Comment #54 from Dmitry Timoshkov <dmitry(a)codeweavers.com> 2009-11-30 12:13:20 --- *** Bug 20880 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12516 Dmitry Timoshkov <dmitry(a)codeweavers.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|unspecified |0.9.59. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12516 Robert Wm Ruedisueli <esd45(a)earthlink.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |esd45(a)earthlink.net --- Comment #55 from Robert Wm Ruedisueli <esd45(a)earthlink.net> 2010-07-12 10:22:30 --- This technically is a bug in wine, now that wine includes kernel API emulation. This is actually part of a much larger limitation of not being able to access underlying hardware functions. Obviously going full emulation would not be an option. However, the better options would be to utilize a modified variant of Xen to handle the remapping of memory, IO and processor functions to the state and location of a standard win32 system. Both the APIC and the Virtualization extensions can do this very efficiently, and it's not like we would be remapping standard program memory, or even emulating all the hardware. No matter what the solution is remapping-based emulation of these functions is the ideal solution. This would provide a lot of added features for hardware-reliant programs including the ability to secure device access for programs -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12516 --- Comment #56 from Dmitry Timoshkov <dmitry(a)codeweavers.com> 2010-07-12 10:40:32 --- (In reply to comment #55)
This technically is a bug in wine, now that wine includes kernel API emulation.
Wine does not include the kernel API emulation, why do you think it does? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12516 --- Comment #57 from Robert Wm Ruedisueli <esd45(a)earthlink.net> 2010-07-12 19:12:12 --- I should clarify that, I should say that now there is implementation of some essential kernel API functions. Emulating the full kernel API would be a ridiculous waist of time, especially since a huge portion of it is completely hidden from programs. Clearly kernel emulation is far from the way to describe it. However, come to think of it a full fix for the cause of this bug, as I described, enable doing a bug for bug memory map replication, something that would be classified as an enhancement. It would allow for more efficient handling of Direct X, and better isolation of platform specific code relating to Host OS kernel memory mapping. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12516 Dmitry Timoshkov <dmitry(a)codeweavers.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|err:dosmem:setup_dos_mem |err:dosmem:setup_dos_mem |error report on every run |error report on every run |of Wine |(not a Wine bug) --- Comment #58 from Dmitry Timoshkov <dmitry(a)codeweavers.com> 2010-07-13 00:54:53 --- This bug is about running DOS applications which is impossible without an ability to access page 0. I have no idea why you think this somehow may improve DirectX or anything else. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12516 --- Comment #59 from Robert Wm Ruedisueli <esd45(a)earthlink.net> 2010-07-14 18:56:30 --- What I meant to say was not this limitation was interfering with Direct X performance, but the larger limitation it is symptomatic of. Basically Wine's entire memory mapping and memory access capabilities on all modes is entirely limited by the Host OS. While this is fine for now, it will not be good in the long term, as this limitation puts Wine at the mercy of the host OS when choosing how programs see memory, and what shared memory methods are used. While this is all fine if the host OS is providing optimal methods for doing things. Wine should create a universal means to direct the OS on how to handle memory remapping for Wine, and a variety of transparent fall-backs for when the Host OS is incapable of doing what is necessary to properly match bug for bug Win32 specifications. Without this, bug for bug matching of the memory mapping of all access modes used by drivers and programs will be literally impossible. Basically, I'm saying it's better to stomp one big bug, than stomp out all it's children. We have the first small bug here that is symptomatic of a much larger limitation. Making plans to defeat that limitation in the long run, could save us hassles down the road, and greatly improve performance. As of how this relates to Direct X. The current Direct X drivers are greatly limited by Wine's shared memory access. By improving the memory mapping methods used in all segments of Wine, we can pave the way for improvements in that department. It's basically that some of the limitations on how Direct X is implemented are limited by memory mapping capabilities as well. Just like this bug is caused by those same limitations, even if the limitation is impacting a completely different subsection. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12516 --- Comment #60 from Dmitry Timoshkov <dmitry(a)codeweavers.com> 2010-07-14 23:46:51 --- It appears to me that you have no idea what you are talking about, just like you don't know where the message in the summary of this bug is printed and why. Please stop confusing yourself and others. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12516 --- Comment #61 from Dan Kegel <dank(a)kegel.com> 2010-07-14 23:48:59 --- Agreed... Robert, you seem to be throwing out the baby with the bathwater, or prematurely optimizing, or something. Please pick some more measurable problem to work on. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12516 --- Comment #62 from Robert Wm Ruedisueli <esd45(a)earthlink.net> 2010-07-17 23:19:08 --- You are probably right, since we don't know the nature of other limitations we will encounter in memory access. The first bug one may not represent the nature of future ones, so making a universal preemptive fix for this and all future related issues may not be worth the effort if it doesn't necessarily prevent future bugs, or even lay groundwork for fixing them. Until we see a pattern in Host OS limitation bugs, we won't know what would be effective other than workarounds -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
participants (1)
-
wine-bugs＠winehq.org