[Bug 17324] New: Lotus Notes Client 6.5.5 crashes after some minutes
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17324 Summary: Lotus Notes Client 6.5.5 crashes after some minutes Product: Wine Version: 1.1.14 Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: toralf.foerster(a)gmx.de Compared to 1.1.13 if I run LN client longer than - say 10 minutes - it crashes. LN gives a popup windows saying it - that's all. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17324 --- Comment #1 from Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster(a)gmx.de> 2009-02-09 06:31:31 --- BTW, this I got : ... err:win:DefWindowProcW called for other process window 0x10020 err:win:DefWindowProcW called for other process window 0x10020 err:win:DefWindowProcW called for other process window 0x10020 err:win:DefWindowProcW called for other process window 0x10020 err:win:DefWindowProcW called for other process window 0x10020 fixme:netapi32:NetUserEnum ((null),20, 0x2,0x33f064,-1,0x33f26c,0x33f270,0x33f058) stub! err:win:DefWindowProcW called for other process window 0x10020 err:win:DefWindowProcW called for other process window 0x10020 fixme:ntdll:NtQuerySystemInformation info_class SYSTEM_HANDLE_INFORMATION fixme:ntdll:NtQuerySystemInformation info_class SYSTEM_HANDLE_INFORMATION err:win:DefWindowProcW called for other process window 0x10020 err:win:DefWindowProcW called for other process window 0x10020 err:win:DefWindowProcW called for other process window 0x10020 err:win:DefWindowProcW called for other process window 0x10020 fixme:ntdll:NtQueryObject Unsupported information class 1 fixme:ntdll:NtQueryObject Unsupported information class 1 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17324 --- Comment #2 from Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> 2009-02-09 09:44:18 --- Please run a regression test: http://wiki.winehq.org/RegressionTesting -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17324 --- Comment #3 from Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster(a)gmx.de> 2009-02-10 03:43:13 --- Probably not a regression (some notes application were changed within last 2 weeks while I was away from my work place) - therefore it seems to be a general issue :-( Today I got (after an hour or so) with 1.1.13: ... err:win:DefWindowProcW called for other process window 0x10020 fixme:netapi32:NetUserEnum ((null),20, 0x2,0x33f064,-1,0x33f26c,0x33f270,0x33f058) stub! err:win:DefWindowProcW called for other process window 0x10020 err:win:DefWindowProcW called for other process window 0x10020 err:win:DefWindowProcW called for other process window 0x10020 err:win:DefWindowProcW called for other process window 0x10020 err:win:DefWindowProcW called for other process window 0x10020 fixme:ntdll:NtQuerySystemInformation info_class SYSTEM_HANDLE_INFORMATION fixme:ntdll:NtQuerySystemInformation info_class SYSTEM_HANDLE_INFORMATION err:win:DefWindowProcW called for other process window 0x10020 err:win:DefWindowProcW called for other process window 0x10020 fixme:ntdll:NtQueryObject Unsupported information class 1 fixme:ntdll:NtQueryObject Unsupported information class 1 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17324 Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster(a)gmx.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Platform|Other |PC Summary|Lotus Notes Client 6.5.5 |Lotus Notes Client 6.5.5 |crashes after some minutes |crashed Version|1.1.14 |1.1.13 --- Comment #4 from Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster(a)gmx.de> 2009-02-11 04:00:47 --- verified, that 1.1.12 works fine, 1.1.13 not. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17324 --- Comment #5 from Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster(a)gmx.de> 2009-02-13 06:27:47 --- Created an attachment (id=19417) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=19417) stderr output While currently bisecting, LN crashes for wine-1.1.12-270-g120584d, stderr is attached. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17324 Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster(a)gmx.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #19417|stderr output |stderr output for wine- description| |1.1.12-270-g120584d -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17324 --- Comment #6 from Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster(a)gmx.de> 2009-02-17 03:57:51 --- Created an attachment (id=19509) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=19509) stderr output for wine-1.1.12-217-g3fd7a47 another stderr output showing an issue -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17324 --- Comment #7 from Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster(a)gmx.de> 2009-02-18 02:31:39 --- Created an attachment (id=19526) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=19526) stderr output for 11c1d7a (In reply to comment #2)
Please run a regression test: http://wiki.winehq.org/RegressionTesting
Done : tfoerste(a)n22 ~/devel/wine-git $ git bisect bad 11c1d7a0e7ff8d4713c8177dce4ba54781e69ead is first bad commit commit 11c1d7a0e7ff8d4713c8177dce4ba54781e69ead Author: Nikolay Sivov <bunglehead(a)gmail.com> Date: Wed Jan 7 11:58:29 2009 +0300 ole32: Fix return value for DefaultHandler_GetMiscStatus. :040000 040000 c714b9a367c8894e61a1c528a1e014e66e3a35c9 5e1fd0df7307b205054fdc2316e17b3b56dda223 M dlls The test of each version was marked as "bad" as soon as a crash occured. If however notes run for longer than 1 to up to 4 hours it was marked as "good". Unfortunately IMHO this might implie false "good" but at least the issue was introduced between 1.1.12 and this commit. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17324 --- Comment #8 from Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> 2009-02-18 11:17:06 --- (In reply to comment #7)
Created an attachment (id=19526) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=19526) [details] stderr output for 11c1d7a
(In reply to comment #2)
Please run a regression test: http://wiki.winehq.org/RegressionTesting
Done :
tfoerste(a)n22 ~/devel/wine-git $ git bisect bad 11c1d7a0e7ff8d4713c8177dce4ba54781e69ead is first bad commit commit 11c1d7a0e7ff8d4713c8177dce4ba54781e69ead Author: Nikolay Sivov <bunglehead(a)gmail.com> Date: Wed Jan 7 11:58:29 2009 +0300
ole32: Fix return value for DefaultHandler_GetMiscStatus.
:040000 040000 c714b9a367c8894e61a1c528a1e014e66e3a35c9 5e1fd0df7307b205054fdc2316e17b3b56dda223 M dlls
The test of each version was marked as "bad" as soon as a crash occured. If however notes run for longer than 1 to up to 4 hours it was marked as "good". Unfortunately IMHO this might implie false "good" but at least the issue was introduced between 1.1.12 and this commit.
That should probably be okay. To be sure, try reverting that patch and see if it helps. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17324 Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |regression -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17324 --- Comment #9 from Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster(a)gmx.de> 2009-02-18 11:40:36 --- (In reply to comment #8)
That should probably be okay. To be sure, try reverting that patch and see if it helps.
Already done by the bisecting process - the previous version I marked as good. BTW thi issue is still in wine-1.1.15. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17324 --- Comment #10 from Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> 2009-02-18 12:03:59 --- (In reply to comment #9)
(In reply to comment #8)
That should probably be okay. To be sure, try reverting that patch and see if it helps.
Already done by the bisecting process - the previous version I marked as good.
BTW thi issue is still in wine-1.1.15.
No, I mean revert that patch in wine 1.1.15 and see if that helps. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17324 --- Comment #11 from Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster(a)gmx.de> 2009-02-19 02:21:29 --- (In reply to comment #10)
No, I mean revert that patch in wine 1.1.15 and see if that helps.
Unfortunately not, notes still crashed with ... fixme:ntdll:NtQueryObject Unsupported information class 1 fixme:ntdll:NtQueryObject Unsupported information class 1 - so the whole work for bisecting was needless :-( OTOH at least it points out to an intervall where the issue was introduced. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17324 kees duineveld <kees.duineveld(a)xs4all.nl> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kees.duineveld(a)xs4all.nl --- Comment #12 from kees duineveld <kees.duineveld(a)xs4all.nl> 2009-02-23 12:44:09 --- Additional application/ On startup winBUGS gives a trap # 101 in a popup window. After pressing OK winbugs closes. After a regression test I came to 11c1d7a0e7ff8d4713c8177dce4ba54781e69ead is first bad commit Which lead me to this bug. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17324 --- Comment #13 from Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster(a)gmx.de> 2009-02-24 02:24:18 --- Seems to be a different issue b/c I'm currently within bisecting process and narrowed the notes crash down to a commit between 7c18851..d661725 (8 revisions left). -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17324 --- Comment #14 from Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster(a)gmx.de> 2009-02-24 05:34:54 --- I bisected the issue to : tfoerste(a)n22 ~/devel/wine-git $ git bisect bad 8a5eae2122478f5f057b1f696523157003d0dbcc is first bad commit commit 8a5eae2122478f5f057b1f696523157003d0dbcc Author: Hans Leidekker <hans(a)codeweavers.com> Date: Tue Jan 6 11:20:41 2009 +0100 usp10: Handle CR/LF in ScriptItemize. :040000 040000 ec9d2861749359e5f145a4af35189c37feff9010 2961a4bb15ac25e84452a4cc3626b410ef8e4d6b M dlls Verified it by reverting that commit and applying the patch agains wine-1.1.15 : tfoerste(a)n22 ~/devel/wine-git $ git diff 020456f..8a5eae2 | patch -p1 -R patching file dlls/usp10/tests/usp10.c patching file dlls/usp10/usp10.c I currently run notes w/ this version, runs fine until now. BTW the issue always happened (however unfortunately not at every try) by opening one of 3 specific documents, common was that all docsuments have attachements (*.xls or *.doc) -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17324 Hans Leidekker <hans(a)meelstraat.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |hans(a)meelstraat.net --- Comment #15 from Hans Leidekker <hans(a)meelstraat.net> 2009-02-24 06:18:51 --- Please attach a WINEDEBUG=+uniscribe trace with the patch applied. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17324 --- Comment #16 from Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster(a)gmx.de> 2009-02-24 07:33:50 --- (In reply to comment #15)
Please attach a WINEDEBUG=+uniscribe trace with the patch applied.
Unfortunately not possible, the content of thoses docs are confidential . -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17324 --- Comment #17 from Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> 2009-02-24 10:03:34 --- (In reply to comment #16)
(In reply to comment #15)
Please attach a WINEDEBUG=+uniscribe trace with the patch applied.
Unfortunately not possible, the content of thoses docs are confidential .
Could you try with a test/non-confidential document? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17324 --- Comment #18 from Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster(a)gmx.de> 2009-02-25 02:55:53 --- Created an attachment (id=19640) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=19640) lotus notes stderr (In reply to comment #17)
Could you try with a test/non-confidential document?
I created a dummy doc with 2 attachments, trace is attached. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17324 --- Comment #19 from Hans Leidekker <hans(a)meelstraat.net> 2009-02-25 04:30:41 --- Thanks. Unfortunately there's not enough information in that trace. Can you please create another one with these debug channels turned on: +uniscribe,+relay,+seh ? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17324 --- Comment #20 from Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster(a)gmx.de> 2009-02-25 04:45:29 --- (In reply to comment #19)
Thanks. Unfortunately there's not enough information in that trace. Can you please create another one with these debug channels turned on: +uniscribe,+relay,+seh ?
Yes, but b/c that the trace file is ~ 300 MB in size and compressed ~ 7 MB do you have any web spcae to upload it ? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17324 --- Comment #21 from Hans Leidekker <hans(a)meelstraat.net> 2009-02-25 04:57:14 ---
Yes, but b/c that the trace file is ~ 300 MB in size and compressed ~ 7 MB do you have any web spcae to upload it ?
Just attach the tail end of the log that fits bugzilla's limit. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17324 --- Comment #22 from Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster(a)gmx.de> 2009-02-25 05:48:33 --- Created an attachment (id=19646) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=19646) split 1#7 splitted with:split --bytes=1000000 LotusNotes.stderr.gz -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17324 --- Comment #23 from Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster(a)gmx.de> 2009-02-25 05:49:09 --- Created an attachment (id=19647) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=19647) split 2#7 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17324 --- Comment #24 from Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster(a)gmx.de> 2009-02-25 05:49:44 --- Created an attachment (id=19648) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=19648) split 3#7 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17324 --- Comment #25 from Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster(a)gmx.de> 2009-02-25 05:50:21 --- Created an attachment (id=19649) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=19649) split 4#7 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17324 --- Comment #26 from Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster(a)gmx.de> 2009-02-25 05:51:11 --- Created an attachment (id=19650) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=19650) split 5#7 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17324 --- Comment #27 from Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster(a)gmx.de> 2009-02-25 05:51:46 --- Created an attachment (id=19651) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=19651) split 6#7 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17324 --- Comment #28 from Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster(a)gmx.de> 2009-02-25 05:52:19 --- Created an attachment (id=19652) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=19652) split 7#7 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17324 --- Comment #29 from Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster(a)gmx.de> 2009-02-25 05:54:12 --- Created an attachment (id=19653) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=19653) split 8#7 oops - there are 8 parts due to the split into 1 MiB than 1 MB -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17324 --- Comment #30 from Hans Leidekker <hans(a)meelstraat.net> 2009-02-26 05:23:16 --- There's no crash in that log. Does it really fail in the same way? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17324 --- Comment #31 from Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster(a)gmx.de> 2009-02-26 06:23:26 --- (In reply to comment #30)
There's no crash in that log. Does it really fail in the same way?
No, as already said, the crash occurs currently only for docs which are all confidential - therefore we cannot publish such a trace. The attached trace is w/o an crash got from a dummy document which follows the same structure as the confidential docs. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17324 --- Comment #32 from Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> 2009-02-26 09:25:00 --- (In reply to comment #31)
(In reply to comment #30)
There's no crash in that log. Does it really fail in the same way?
No, as already said, the crash occurs currently only for docs which are all confidential - therefore we cannot publish such a trace. The attached trace is w/o an crash got from a dummy document which follows the same structure as the confidential docs.
You need to figure out what's triggering the bug in those documents then and get a trace with that information. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17324 Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster(a)gmx.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #19646|0 |1 is obsolete| | Attachment #19647|0 |1 is obsolete| | Attachment #19648|0 |1 is obsolete| | Attachment #19649|0 |1 is obsolete| | Attachment #19650|0 |1 is obsolete| | Attachment #19651|0 |1 is obsolete| | Attachment #19652|0 |1 is obsolete| | Attachment #19653|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #33 from Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster(a)gmx.de> 2009-03-02 04:15:36 --- Created an attachment (id=19741) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=19741) stderr output for wine-1.1.16 (In reply to comment #32)
You need to figure out what's triggering the bug in those documents then and get a trace with that information.
attached is the end (last 100000 lines) of such a trace, if you need more (about 4.6 million lines), pls request it. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17324 --- Comment #34 from Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster(a)gmx.de> 2009-03-02 04:51:43 --- BTW after taking a look at the soutrce code of the suspicious commit and - b/c wine-1.1.16 crashed 2 times in a row after opening a specific document - I reverted one specific line of that commit, until now it seems to work : diff --git a/dlls/usp10/usp10.c b/dlls/usp10/usp10.c index fc2f8e9..6d8912c 100644 --- a/dlls/usp10/usp10.c +++ b/dlls/usp10/usp10.c @@ -556,7 +556,7 @@ HRESULT WINAPI ScriptItemize(const WCHAR *pwcInChars, int cInChars, int cMaxItem New_Script, pItems[index].a.eScript, index, cnt, pItems[index].iCharPos); - for (cnt=1; cnt < cInChars; cnt++) + for (cnt=0; cnt < cInChars; cnt++) { if (pwcInChars[cnt] == '\r') New_Script = Script_CR; -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17324 --- Comment #35 from Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster(a)gmx.de> 2009-03-02 05:58:54 --- (In reply to comment #34)
reverted one specific line of that commit, until now it seems to work :
erm, no, it doesn#t help. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17324 --- Comment #36 from Hans Leidekker <hans(a)meelstraat.net> 2009-03-02 07:00:32 --- That log file doesn't show any uniscribe calls. Please create a +relay,+seh,+uniscribe log that shows, say, the last 20 uniscribe calls and then as many lines as possible. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17324 --- Comment #37 from Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster(a)gmx.de> 2009-03-02 07:43:18 --- Created an attachment (id=19745) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=19745) uniscribe greped attached: tfoerste(a)n22 /var/tmp $ grep -B 5 -A 5 uniscribe LotusNotes.stderr > uniscribe.greped tfoerste(a)n22 /var/tmp $ gzip uniscribe.greped -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17324 --- Comment #38 from Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster(a)gmx.de> 2009-03-02 07:49:52 --- Created an attachment (id=19746) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=19746) last 500 K Lines tfoerste(a)n22 /var/tmp $ tail -n 500000 LotusNotes.stderr > last500Klines.log tfoerste(a)n22 /var/tmp $ gzip last500Klines.log -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17324 --- Comment #39 from Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster(a)gmx.de> 2009-03-16 05:03:15 --- Tested wine-1.1.17 - issue still here, applying $> git diff 020456f..8a5eae2 dlls/usp10/usp10.c | patch -R -p1 to the sources resolved it. BTW I found an additional document within the same notes database where this issue occurs. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17324 --- Comment #40 from Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster(a)gmx.de> 2009-04-14 02:31:37 --- FWIW the issue still happens with wine-1.1.18 however not relyable. This means w/o reverting the mentioned commit the issue only sometimes happens (always and only w/ documents from a specific Lotus Notes database) whereas reverting that commit never results into a crash. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17324 --- Comment #41 from Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> 2009-10-12 14:55:50 --- Is this still an issue in current (1.1.31 or newer) wine? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17324 --- Comment #42 from Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster(a)gmx.de> 2009-10-13 02:46:53 --- Created an attachment (id=24068) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=24068) stderr notes crashed few minutes ago while opening a document from that ln database (wine-1.1.31-78-gd95d7db) -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17324 --- Comment #43 from Dmitry Timoshkov <dmitry(a)codeweavers.com> 2009-10-13 03:51:31 --- (In reply to comment #42)
Created an attachment (id=24068) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=24068) [details] stderr notes crashed few minutes ago while opening a document from that ln database (wine-1.1.31-78-gd95d7db)
There is no a crash indication in that output. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17324 --- Comment #44 from Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster(a)gmx.de> 2009-10-13 03:57:45 --- (In reply to comment #43)
There is no a crash indication in that output. which WINEDEBUG settings would you advice to improve such a output ?
-- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17324 --- Comment #45 from Dmitry Timoshkov <dmitry(a)codeweavers.com> 2009-10-13 04:04:58 --- (In reply to comment #44)
There is no a crash indication in that output. which WINEDEBUG settings would you advice to improve such a output ?
I just wonder why did you claim that there is a crash. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17324 --- Comment #46 from Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster(a)gmx.de> 2009-10-13 04:23:43 --- (In reply to comment #45)
I just wonder why did you claim that there is a crash. Oh - Lotus Notes crashes with the crash dialog.
I know that reverting the mentioned commit in the bug report makes Lotus Notes working fine w/o any problems. I'm wondering how I can help you to identify the root cause. Unfortunately the crash can't be easily reproduced and I've do revert that commit for current git sources to get a wrking wine+ln solution - but for the next few days I could run the unpatched wine software and send you the appropriate output if wanted. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17324 --- Comment #47 from Jeff Zaroyko <jeffz(a)jeffz.name> 2009-10-13 04:51:09 --- (In reply to comment #46)
(In reply to comment #45)
I just wonder why did you claim that there is a crash. Oh - Lotus Notes crashes with the crash dialog.
http://wiki.winehq.org/Backtraces -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17324 Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster(a)gmx.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #19417|0 |1 is obsolete| | Attachment #19509|0 |1 is obsolete| | Attachment #19526|0 |1 is obsolete| | Attachment #19640|0 |1 is obsolete| | Attachment #19741|0 |1 is obsolete| | Attachment #19745|0 |1 is obsolete| | Attachment #19746|0 |1 is obsolete| | Attachment #24068|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #48 from Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster(a)gmx.de> 2009-10-13 07:43:48 --- Created an attachment (id=24072) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=24072) winedbg bt backtrace of ln crash -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17324 --- Comment #49 from Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster(a)gmx.de> 2009-10-26 08:35:32 --- Created an attachment (id=24362) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=24362) backtrace of versino 1.1.32 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17324 Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster(a)gmx.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #24362|backtrace of versino 1.1.32 |backtrace of version 1.1.32 description| | -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17324 Dan Kegel <dank(a)kegel.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dank(a)kegel.com --- Comment #50 from Dan Kegel <dank(a)kegel.com> 2009-10-27 09:09:11 --- a +synchronous,+relay,+xrender log might be of some interest, too. compress big logs with rzip (rzip.samba.org) rather than splitting, if possible. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17324 --- Comment #51 from Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster(a)gmx.de> 2009-10-27 09:25:12 --- Created an attachment (id=24388) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=24388) backtrace w/ export WINEDEBUG=+synchronous,+relay,+xrender -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17324 --- Comment #52 from Dan Kegel <dank(a)kegel.com> 2009-10-27 12:48:30 --- That looks like the same crash as bug 12307. Hmm. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17324 --- Comment #53 from Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster(a)gmx.de> 2010-01-05 09:49:02 --- Created an attachment (id=25555) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=25555) revert part of commit which crashes lotus notes. There's now another scenario where Lotus Notes crashed under wine-1.1.35. If I open an invitation within the calendar and press "Request information ...." then notes crashes. With the (attached) patch however an input window is opened w/o problems. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17324 --- Comment #54 from Dan Kegel <dank(a)kegel.com> 2010-01-05 10:11:10 --- Now the big challenge: can you come up with a miminal testcase that needs your change to pass? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17324 --- Comment #55 from Dmitry Timoshkov <dmitry(a)codeweavers.com> 2010-01-06 00:12:53 --- 'pItems[index].iCharPos = cnt' assignments in TRACE()s look wrong. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17324 --- Comment #56 from Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster(a)gmx.de> 2010-01-06 03:10:11 --- (In reply to comment #55)
'pItems[index].iCharPos = cnt' assignments in TRACE()s look wrong.
Probably you#re right, after I bisected the wrong commit (comment #14) I tried to play with that line but w/o luck (maybe b/c the bug wasn't 100% repeatable with the used test case). -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17324 --- Comment #57 from Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster(a)gmx.de> 2010-01-08 03:55:13 --- (In reply to comment #54)
Now the big challenge: can you come up with a miminal testcase that needs your change to pass?
I commented out line 607 and now the crash went away. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17324 Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster(a)gmx.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #24072|0 |1 is obsolete| | Attachment #24362|0 |1 is obsolete| | Attachment #24388|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #58 from Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster(a)gmx.de> 2010-01-08 04:07:44 --- Created an attachment (id=25608) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=25608) fix a crash I tested this patch with some documents from a confidential lotus notes database where notes crashed before - now it works there too. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17324 Dan Kegel <dank(a)kegel.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |patch Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW CC| |lats(a)yless4u.com.au Ever Confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #59 from Dan Kegel <dank(a)kegel.com> 2010-01-08 08:06:39 --- git blame says that line was added by http://source.winehq.org/git/wine.git/?a=commitdiff;h=ff421fde8e88243b8d78e2... cc'ing the author. That change was way before wine-1.1.13, so I don't know why it's biting you now. Maybe you just got lucky :-) -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17324 --- Comment #60 from Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster(a)gmx.de> 2010-01-11 03:45:04 --- (In reply to comment #59)
That change was way before wine-1.1.13, so I don't know why it's biting you now. Maybe you just got lucky :-)
With wine-1.1.36 I had to apply the full patch, commenting out only that single line brought the issue back. I'm arguing that this patch isn't the culprit itself but it does unhide an issue elsewhere. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17324 --- Comment #61 from Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster(a)gmx.de> 2010-01-13 03:36:17 --- With "$>export WINEDEBUG=+uniscribe" I run Lotus Notes 6.5.5 with the current git version wine-1.1.36 and with the git version patched with http://bugs2.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=25555 . I'll attach the output files. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17324 --- Comment #62 from Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster(a)gmx.de> 2010-01-13 03:37:43 --- Created an attachment (id=25703) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=25703) WINEDEBUG=+uniscribe output of wine-1.1.36 output of tfoerste(a)n22 ~ $ wine start /Unix "/home/tfoerste/.wine/drive_c/Program Files/lotus/notes/notes.exe" 1>out.txt 2>&1 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17324 --- Comment #63 from Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster(a)gmx.de> 2010-01-13 03:38:42 --- Created an attachment (id=25704) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=25704) WINEDEBUG=+uniscribe output of wine-1.1.36 + patch output of tfoerste(a)n22 ~ $ wine start /Unix "/home/tfoerste/.wine/drive_c/Program Files/lotus/notes/notes.exe" 1>out_patched.txt 2>&1 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17324 --- Comment #64 from Jeff L <lats(a)yless4u.com.au> 2010-02-28 06:02:05 --- I have submitted a patch to clean up the TRACE statement to remove the assignment: diff --git a/dlls/usp10/usp10.c b/dlls/usp10/usp10.c index 523bd4f..a8ae4ce 100644 --- a/dlls/usp10/usp10.c +++ b/dlls/usp10/usp10.c @@ -604,7 +604,7 @@ HRESULT WINAPI ScriptItemize(const WCHAR *pwcInChars, int cInChars, int cMaxItem * checks the n+1 structure */ memset(&pItems[index+1].a, 0, sizeof(SCRIPT_ANALYSIS)); - TRACE("index=%d cnt=%d iCharPos=%d\n", index+1, cnt, pItems[index+1].iCharPos = cnt); + TRACE("index=%d cnt=%d iCharPos=%d\n", index+1, cnt, pItems[index+1].iCharPos); /* Set one SCRIPT_STATE item being returned */ if (pcItems) *pcItems = index + 1; you might like to test it and see if there is any improvement. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17324 --- Comment #65 from Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster(a)gmx.de> 2010-03-01 02:20:18 --- (In reply to comment #64)
I have submitted a patch to clean up the TRACE statement to remove the assignment: ... you might like to test it and see if there is any improvement. No, bug is still in 1.1.39.
-- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17324 --- Comment #66 from Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster(a)gmx.de> 2010-03-01 03:40:02 --- This makes the bug away - but I dunno why : diff --git a/dlls/usp10/usp10.c b/dlls/usp10/usp10.c index 523bd4f..b4896c8 100644 --- a/dlls/usp10/usp10.c +++ b/dlls/usp10/usp10.c @@ -558,9 +558,9 @@ HRESULT WINAPI ScriptItemize(const WCHAR *pwcInChars, int cInChars, int cMaxItem for (cnt=1; cnt < cInChars; cnt++) { - if (pwcInChars[cnt] == '\r') - New_Script = Script_CR; - else +// if (pwcInChars[cnt] == '\r') +// New_Script = Script_CR; +// else if (pwcInChars[cnt] == '\n') New_Script = Script_LF; else -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17324 --- Comment #67 from Jeff L <lats(a)yless4u.com.au> 2010-03-01 05:44:51 --- Created an attachment (id=26559) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=26559) Extra trace for debugging I want to check if the problem is a buffer overrun. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17324 --- Comment #68 from Jeff L <lats(a)yless4u.com.au> 2010-03-01 05:46:24 --- Can you apply the patch posted last and rerun the trace so that I see if this a buffer overrun? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17324 Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster(a)gmx.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #25703|0 |1 is obsolete| | Attachment #25704|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #69 from Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster(a)gmx.de> 2010-03-01 07:57:39 --- Created an attachment (id=26562) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=26562) last 300 lines w/ exra TRACE at wine-1.1.39 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17324 --- Comment #70 from Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster(a)gmx.de> 2010-03-01 09:57:18 --- Created an attachment (id=26563) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=26563) complete trace file This is the complete trace file as requested for a dummy invitation with these settings : Subject: "test" When: "Tue 03/02/2010 9:00 AM - 10:00 AM" Location: "somewhere" Rooms: "over" Resources: "the rainbow" Description: "hier könnte ihre werbung stehen !" -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17324 Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster(a)gmx.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #25608|0 |1 is obsolete| | -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17324 --- Comment #71 from Jeff L <lats(a)yless4u.com.au> 2010-03-06 17:39:41 --- Created an attachment (id=26648) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=26648) Candidate patch to prevent running out of script items on last item ScriptItemize needs an extra script_item to store the end pointer. It looks like it is possible to cause a write past the end of the block which is probably triggers an exception randomly depending on where the block is located in memory. Can you give this a test. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17324 --- Comment #72 from Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster(a)gmx.de> 2010-03-08 02:43:18 --- (In reply to comment #71)
Can you give this a test. Doesn't help.
-- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17324 --- Comment #73 from Jeff L <lats(a)yless4u.com.au> 2010-03-08 02:57:55 --- That's unfortunate as I have taken some strings from the trace you provided and run test cases that was the only area where there was a weakness. You say that the trace is of a run that does not fail? If that is the case, are you able to provide last part of the trace where a failure occurs with substitution of the text but not changing numerics, \n, \r or unicode text? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17324 --- Comment #74 from Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster(a)gmx.de> 2010-03-08 07:42:28 --- Created an attachment (id=26692) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=26692) another creash trace example This is another example of a Lotus Notes calendar invitation I got where LN crashes as soon as I click on "Request information". The trace is made of wine-1.1.40 with this patch : tfoerste(a)n22 ~/devel/wine-git $ git diff diff --git a/dlls/usp10/usp10.c b/dlls/usp10/usp10.c index 28984e0..fcbedb1 100644 --- a/dlls/usp10/usp10.c +++ b/dlls/usp10/usp10.c @@ -558,6 +558,7 @@ HRESULT WINAPI ScriptItemize(const WCHAR *pwcInChars, int cInChars, int cMaxItem for (cnt=1; cnt < cInChars; cnt++) { + TRACE("debug: Index=%d cnt=%d iCharPos=%d\n", index, cnt, pItems[index].iCharPos); if (pwcInChars[cnt] == '\r') New_Script = Script_CR; else @@ -605,6 +606,7 @@ HRESULT WINAPI ScriptItemize(const WCHAR *pwcInChars, int cInChars, int cMaxItem TRACE("index=%d cnt=%d iCharPos=%d\n", index+1, cnt, pItems[index+1].iCharPos); /* Set one SCRIPT_STATE item being returned */ + if (index + 2 > cMaxItems) return E_OUTOFMEMORY; if (pcItems) *pcItems = index + 1; /* Set SCRIPT_ITEM */ wine was configured with this line : export CFLAGS="-O2 -march=native -pipe -g -ggdb"; export CXXFLAGS="$CFLAGS="; export CC="ccache gcc"; ./configure Before that I made a "make distclean" and for the trace a "export WINEDEBUG=+uniscribe". -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17324 Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster(a)gmx.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #26692|another creash trace |another crash trace example description|example | -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17324 Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster(a)gmx.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #26563|0 |1 is obsolete| | Attachment #26692|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #75 from Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster(a)gmx.de> 2010-03-09 03:50:34 --- Created an attachment (id=26703) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=26703) trace log containing only the relevant part before the crash occurs therefore much more handy I think. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17324 Jeff L <lats(a)yless4u.com.au> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #26648|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #76 from Jeff L <lats(a)yless4u.com.au> 2010-03-10 06:13:15 --- Created an attachment (id=26726) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=26726) Patch to change invalid glyphs to 0 The default glyph from an mapped char is 0xffff. ScriptShape does the look up of the glyphs and marks missing glyphs with 0xffff. This causes a crash in xrender in test cases. I am not sure that this will be a valid patch even if it fixes the problem but if it works we will see as I have a valid test exhibiting the problem. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17324 --- Comment #77 from Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster(a)gmx.de> 2010-03-10 07:23:30 --- (In reply to comment #76)
Created an attachment (id=26726) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=26726) [details] Patch to change invalid glyphs to 0
The default glyph from an mapped char is 0xffff. ScriptShape does the look up of the glyphs and marks missing glyphs with 0xffff. This causes a crash in xrender in test cases.
I am not sure that this will be a valid patch even if it fixes the problem but if it works we will see as I have a valid test exhibiting the problem. The crash went away applying this patch on top on 1.1.40
:-) -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17324 Jeff L <lats(a)yless4u.com.au> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|-unknown |usp10 --- Comment #78 from Jeff L <lats(a)yless4u.com.au> 2010-03-11 07:13:01 --- Patch and test case at http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2010-March/085655.html This patch fixes bug 17324 http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17324 The problem is that ScriptShape convert characters to glyphs and there is no translation for '\r'. ScriptTextOut is called and X11DRV_XRender_ExtTextOut is called eventually. The glyph is used as an index into an array but as the glyph value is 0xffff it causes an exception. This patch converts the NONEXISTING_GLYPHS to 0 (this is the same behaviour as Windows). -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17324 --- Comment #79 from Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster(a)gmx.de> 2010-03-11 07:54:46 --- (In reply to comment #78)
This patch fixes bug 17324 http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17324
Thx Jeff for your work, this nasty bug did annoy me a long time. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17324 Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster(a)gmx.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED --- Comment #80 from Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster(a)gmx.de> 2010-03-12 02:28:10 --- fixed in svn -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17324 Hans Leidekker <hans(a)meelstraat.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|FIXED | --- Comment #81 from Hans Leidekker <hans(a)meelstraat.net> 2010-03-12 02:44:05 --- There's no fix in git yet. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17324 Jeff L <lats(a)yless4u.com.au> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED --- Comment #82 from Jeff L <lats(a)yless4u.com.au> 2010-03-17 04:10:48 --- Patch resolving this is at http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2010-March/085794.html -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17324 --- Comment #83 from Jeff L <lats(a)yless4u.com.au> 2010-03-17 04:13:59 --- Patch resolving this is at http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-cvs/2010-March/064993.html -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17324 Paul Vriens <Paul.Vriens.Wine(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |Paul.Vriens.Wine(a)gmail.com --- Comment #84 from Paul Vriens <Paul.Vriens.Wine(a)gmail.com> 2010-03-17 07:51:59 --- Fixed by ee891d3b59199daf294c55c7e980035d27d5907f -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17324 Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED --- Comment #85 from Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org> 2010-03-19 14:10:26 --- Closing bugs fixed in 1.1.41. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
participants (1)
-
wine-bugs＠winehq.org