[Bug 19816] New: Enhancement request: MSVBVM60
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19816 Summary: Enhancement request: MSVBVM60 Product: Wine Version: unspecified Platform: PC OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: bammzilla(a)astronomy.com.ph I would like to request that Wine have its own built-in version of MSVBVM60. I don't know how difficult it would be, but since WinXP has it by default I would love Wine to have it as well. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19816 Dmitry Timoshkov <dmitry(a)codeweavers.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #1 from Dmitry Timoshkov <dmitry(a)codeweavers.com> 2009-08-23 01:52:19 --- This is outside of Wine development, same as MFC and others. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19816 Dmitry Timoshkov <dmitry(a)codeweavers.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED --- Comment #2 from Dmitry Timoshkov <dmitry(a)codeweavers.com> 2009-08-23 01:52:47 --- Closing. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19816 Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |UNCONFIRMED Resolution|WONTFIX | --- Comment #3 from Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org> 2009-08-23 02:48:04 --- If it's shipped with Windows then it's within Wine's scope. Of course it probably won't happen any time soon, but it's still a valid request. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19816 Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Version|unspecified |1.1.28 Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Severity|normal |enhancement --- Comment #4 from Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> 2009-08-23 03:12:45 --- Confirming -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19816 --- Comment #5 from Dmitry Timoshkov <dmitry(a)codeweavers.com> 2009-08-23 09:47:15 --- Windows also ships msvbvm50, mfc40, mfc42, mfc71, msvcp50, msvcp60, msvcp70, msvcp71, msvcr70, mdac. Is it ok to start accepting requests for those as well? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19816 --- Comment #6 from Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org> 2009-08-23 12:16:19 --- (In reply to comment #5)
Windows also ships msvbvm50, mfc40, mfc42, mfc71, msvcp50, msvcp60, msvcp70, msvcp71, msvcr70, mdac.
Is it ok to start accepting requests for those as well?
Yes, certainly. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19816 --- Comment #7 from Bamm Gabriana <bammzilla(a)astronomy.com.ph> 2009-08-23 14:41:43 --- As the requestor of this enhancement, please let me explain. So many installers nowadays no longer include these DLLs because they assume they are on the system. As a user, I believe that ideally, running the installer in Wine should allow the user the immediately run the program. I think requiring the user to know that they need to use winetricks after installing their app adds to the reputation of Wine being only for advance users. I believe that winetricks should always and only remain a hack for things that do not work at the moment. It shouldn't be considered a solution for end users. We shouldn't even require end users to know which runtime is needed by their apps, especially since it works out of the box in XP (which by default is what Wine tells the installers it is, btw). Lastly (and this may be just me), I don't like having the real msvbvm50/60 on my system. I just want my apps. If I can have free alternatives then better. If I had the programming skills for this I would probably scratch my itch. But having none, I do the next best thing and file a request in the remote hope that someone has a similar itch with necessary skills. I am by no means requiring those who are already working on other parts (and doing a good job too!) to work on my request instead of what they believe to be important to them. I know that Wine has many more important bugs that need to be worked on, but that shouldn't be reason to prevent what I perceive to be a valid request. After all, it took me 3 years to finally decide to file this bug, because I respect the more important things that needed to be done. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19816 --- Comment #8 from Vitaliy Margolen <vitaliy(a)kievinfo.com> 2009-08-23 15:07:14 --- Just make a bunch of dummy dlls that when loaded pop-up a message - "Use 'winetricks X' to install missing dependency". Not much else you can do short of rewriting 90% of MS' software. OP, if you expect someone to implement all these garbage you are NUTZ!!! -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19816 --- Comment #9 from Bamm Gabriana <bammzilla(a)astronomy.com.ph> 2009-08-23 15:46:38 ---
OP, if you expect someone to implement all these garbage you are NUTZ!!!
I have no illusions that this will be fixed soon. That's reality. My request is not for all these garbage but specifically about MSVBVM60. The other reality is that non-geek users just want their app to run. Alexander understands this, why can't you? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19816 --- Comment #10 from Vitaliy Margolen <vitaliy(a)kievinfo.com> 2009-08-23 17:35:39 --- You talking about implementing something that's not a part of an OS. What's worse, you talking about something that MS holds lots of patents and copyrights on. Ask any lawyer how feasible it is to re-implement MSVB. And I think this is question for for some one else not Alexandre to answer. These are really shaky grounds. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19816 --- Comment #11 from Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> 2009-08-23 18:28:56 --- (In reply to comment #10)
You talking about implementing something that's not a part of an OS. What's worse, you talking about something that MS holds lots of patents and copyrights on. Ask any lawyer how feasible it is to re-implement MSVB.
They also hold patents on a lot of windows builtin functionality. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19816 --- Comment #12 from Bamm Gabriana <bammzilla(a)astronomy.com.ph> 2009-08-23 22:50:17 ---
You talking about implementing something that's not a part of an OS.
Is Notepad a part of the OS? Runtimes allow software to be run, which is what Windows does: provide the means for user's applications to run. Vitaliy, if you don't want to work on it you don't have to. But neither do you have to prevent other people from doing it if they so desire. To illustrate people's differences in interests, I know you like games, but I think games are silly and a waste of time. If Wine is working on DirectX then I don't see reason why Wine shouldn't work on runtimes of more productive apps. If I had the skills, I'd work on this. If someone picks it up, it's his choice. It's not for you to say that he should be working on something more important. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19816 --- Comment #13 from Detlef Riekenberg <wine.dev(a)web.de> 2010-04-22 07:47:40 --- (In reply to comment #5)
Windows also ships msvbvm50, mfc40, mfc42, mfc71, msvcp50, msvcp60, msvcp70, msvcp71, msvcr70, mdac.
Is it ok to start accepting requests for those as well?
Wine has now builtins for more C/C++ runtime libraries: - msvcr70.dll (VS2002) - msvcr71.dll (VS2003) - msvcr80.dll (VS2005) - msvcr90.dll (VS2008) - msvcr100.dll (VS2010) They are far from complete, but enough for many apps. -- By by ... Detlef -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19816 A Wine user <RandomAccountName(a)mail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |RandomAccountName(a)mail.com -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19816 Dmitry Timoshkov <dmitry(a)codeweavers.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Enhancement request: |Add implementation of |MSVBVM60 |MSVBVM60 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19816 Andrew Millington <andrew.millington(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |andrew.millington(a)gmail.com --- Comment #14 from Andrew Millington <andrew.millington(a)gmail.com> 2011-04-29 21:48:52 CDT --- HardOCP UT2k3 Benchmark requires MSVBVM60 err:module:import_dll Library MSVBVM60.DLL (which is needed by L"C:\\UT2K3 Benchmark v2.1\\HardOCP UT2k3 Benchmark.exe") not found err:module:LdrInitializeThunk Main exe initialization for L"C:\\UT2K3 Benchmark v2.1\\HardOCP UT2k3 Benchmark.exe" failed, status c0000135 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19816 fracting <fracting(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fracting(a)gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19816 Diego <paloseco(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |paloseco(a)gmail.com --- Comment #15 from Diego <paloseco(a)gmail.com> 2011-05-05 17:05:34 CDT --- so I guess windows 7 comes with A LOT of these bundles, and like net framework and such.... -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19816 Rex Tsai <chihchun(a)kalug.linux.org.tw> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |chihchun(a)kalug.linux.org.tw -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19816 Diego <paloseco(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|paloseco(a)gmail.com | -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19816 Ken Sharp <kennybobs(a)o2.co.uk> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kennybobs(a)o2.co.uk -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19816 Dan Kegel <dank(a)kegel.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sydbarrett74(a)gmail.com --- Comment #16 from Dan Kegel <dank(a)kegel.com> 2012-03-09 15:03:59 CST --- *** Bug 30124 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19816 Felix Yan <felixonmars(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |felixonmars(a)gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19816 --- Comment #17 from Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> --- Still present in 1.7.21. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19816 --- Comment #18 from Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> --- Still in 1.7.51. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19816 --- Comment #19 from Rosanne DiMesio <dimesio(a)earthlink.net> --- Still not implemented in 1.9.24; also affects Brother's Keeper 7.x. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19816 Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |joe.frey(a)radioles.com --- Comment #20 from Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> --- *** Bug 42448 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19816 Anastasius Focht <focht(a)gmx.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Add implementation of |Multiple games and |MSVBVM60 |applications need | |'msvbvm60.dll' ('winetricks | |vb6run' is a workaround) CC| |focht(a)gmx.net --- Comment #21 from Anastasius Focht <focht(a)gmx.net> --- Hello folks, refining the summary to provide the workaround similar to MFC related tickets: https://bugs.winehq.org/buglist.cgi?bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=NEW&bu... The implementation part ... to quote myself from various MFC tickets: --- quote --- Implementing MFC requires lots of effort which would drain the already limited developer resources available to the Wine project - with little to no benefit. MFC will be long dead when this effort reaches a usable state (if ever). --- quote --- Same applies for Microsoft Visual Basic 6.0 Runtime. Regards -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19816 alexchandel(a)gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |alexchandel(a)gmail.com --- Comment #22 from alexchandel(a)gmail.com --- ComDlg32.OCX (winetricks comdlg32ocx) presumably falls under this category. Not saying it should be a priority at all, but fwiw LOTS of industry software still uses this crap (MSVBVM60.dll, ComDlg32.OCX, etc). Microsoft has a solid foothold there, kept by these old APIs, & they're not going to surrender it for a while. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19816 Zebediah Figura <z.figura12(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |luca.finizio.mgbx(a)hotmail.i | |t --- Comment #23 from Zebediah Figura <z.figura12(a)gmail.com> --- *** Bug 46034 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19816 --- Comment #24 from Anastasius Focht <focht(a)gmx.net> --- Hello folks, for documentation the official Microsoft Support Statement for Visual Basic 6.0 on Windows: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/previous-versions/visualstudio/visual-basic... --- quote --- 64-Bit Windows Visual Basic 6.0 runtime files are 32-bit. These files ship in 64-bit Windows Operating Systems referenced in the table below. 32-bit VB6 applications and components are supported in the WOW emulation environment only. 32-bit components must also be hosted in 32-bit application processes. The Visual Basic 6.0 IDE has never been offered in a native 64-bit version, nor has the 32-bit IDE been supported on 64-bit Windows. VB6 development on 64-bit Windows or any native architecture other than 32-bit is not and will not be supported. Windows 10 Since the initial release of this support statement, the Windows 10 operating system has been released. This document has been updated to clarify Microsoft’s support for VB6 on Windows 10. The VB6 runtime will ship and will be supported in Windows 10 for the lifetime of the OS. Visual Basic 6.0 runtime files continue to be 32-bit only, and all components must be hosted in 32-bit application processes. Developers can think of the support story for Windows 10 as being the same as it is for Windows 8.1. Windows 8.1 Since the initial release of this support statement, the Windows 8.1 operating system has been released. This document has been updated to clarify Microsoft’s support for VB6 on Windows 8.1. The VB6 runtime will ship and will be supported in Windows 8.1 for the lifetime of the OS. Visual Basic 6.0 runtime files continue to be 32-bit only, and all components must be hosted in 32-bit application processes. Developers can think of the support story for Windows 8.1 as being the same as it is for Windows 7. Windows 7 Since the initial release of this support statement, the Windows 7 operating system has been released. This document has been updated to clarify Microsoft’s support for VB6 on Windows 7. The VB6 runtime will ship and will be supported in Windows 7 for the lifetime of the OS. Visual Basic 6.0 runtime files continue to be 32-bit only, and all components must be hosted in 32-bit application processes. Windows Server 2016 Since the initial release of this support statement, the Windows Server 2016 operating system has been released. This document has been updated to clarify Microsoft’s support for VB6 on Windows Server 2016. The VB6 runtime will ship and will be supported in Windows Server 2016 for the lifetime of the OS. Visual Basic 6.0 runtime files continue to be 32-bit only, and all components must be hosted in 32-bit application processes. Developers can think of the support story for Windows Server 2016 as being the same as it is for Windows Server 2012 R2. Windows Server 2012 R2 Since the initial release of this support statement, the Windows Server 2012 R2 operating system has been released. This document has been updated to clarify Microsoft’s support for VB6 on Windows Server 2012 R2. The VB6 runtime will ship and will be supported in Windows Server 2012 R2 for the lifetime of the OS. Visual Basic 6.0 runtime files continue to be 32-bit only, and all components must be hosted in 32-bit application processes. Developers can think of the support story for Windows Server 2012 R2 as being the same as it is for Windows Server 2012. Windows Server 2012 Since the initial release of this support statement, the Windows Server 2012 operating system has been released. This document has been updated to clarify Microsoft’s support for VB6 on Windows Server 2012. The VB6 runtime will ship and will be supported in Windows Server 2012 for the lifetime of the OS. Visual Basic 6.0 runtime files continue to be 32-bit only, and all components must be hosted in 32-bit application processes. Developers can think of the support story for Windows Server 2012 as being the same as it is for Windows Server 2008 R2. Windows Server 2008 R2 Since the initial release of this support statement, the Windows Server 2008 R2 operating system has been released. This document has been updated to clarify Microsoft’s support for VB6 on Windows Server 2008 R2. The VB6 runtime will ship and will be supported in Windows Server 2008 R2 for the lifetime of the OS. Visual Basic 6.0 runtime files continue to be 32-bit only, and all components must be hosted in 32-bit application processes. Developers can think of the support story for Windows Server 2008 R2 as being the same as it is for Windows Server 2008. Windows Server 2008 Since the initial release of this support statement, the Windows Server 2008 operating system has been released. This document has been updated to clarify Microsoft’s support for VB6 on Windows Server 2008. The VB6 runtime will ship and will be supported in Windows Server 2008 for the lifetime of the OS. Visual Basic 6.0 runtime files continue to be 32-bit only, and all components must be hosted in 32-bit application processes. --- quote --- @alexchandel --- quote --- ComDlg32.OCX (winetricks comdlg32ocx) presumably falls under this category. --- quote --- No, that ActiveX control doesn't fall into same category according to the link. --- quote --- Supported runtime files to distribute with your application comct232.ocx msbind.dll msdbrptr.dll msstdfmt.dll comct332.ocx mscdrun.dll msflxgrd.ocx msstkprp.dll comctl32.ocx mschrt20.ocx mshflxgd.ocx mswcrun.dll comdlg32.ocx mscomct2.ocx mshtmpgr.dll mswinsck.ocx dbadapt.dll mscomctl.ocx msinet.ocx picclp32.ocx dbgrid32.ocx mscomm32.ocx msmapi32.ocx richtx32.ocx dblist32.ocx msdatgrd.ocx msmask32.ocx sysinfo.ocx mci32.ocx msdatlst.ocx msrdc20.ocx tabctl32.ocx msadodc.ocx msdatrep.ocx msrdo20.dll --- quote --- Regards -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19816 Louis Lenders <xerox.xerox2000x(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |slawomir.obuchowicz(a)gmail.c | |om --- Comment #25 from Louis Lenders <xerox.xerox2000x(a)gmail.com> --- *** Bug 48752 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19816 Anya <maniikarabera(a)protonmail.ch> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |maniikarabera(a)protonmail.ch -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19816 --- Comment #26 from Bamm Gabriana <bammzilla(a)astronomy.com.ph> --- Would this project be useful to lead to a possible implementtion someday? https://github.com/cocus/openmsvbvm -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19816 Zebediah Figura <z.figura12(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |z.figura12(a)gmail.com --- Comment #27 from Zebediah Figura <z.figura12(a)gmail.com> --- (In reply to Bamm Gabriana from comment #26)
Would this project be useful to lead to a possible implementtion someday?
Probably not. They appear to have used methods that aren't considered safe for Wine development: "API Monitor from ROHITAB was also used to check some runtime values and function calls from the original MSVBVM60.dll. Some reverse-engineering sites such as the ones listed in http://sandsprite.com/vb-reversing/" There's also the problem that there's no actual license attached (although that could probably be resolved by contacting the author and asking for an explicit license). -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19816 Fabian Maurer <dark.shadow4(a)web.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dark.shadow4(a)web.de -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19816 Bartosz <gang65(a)poczta.onet.pl> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |gang65(a)poczta.onet.pl -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19816 Zeb Figura <z.figura12(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ry1tg3+RY1TN1(a)rokejulianloc | |khart.anonaddy.com --- Comment #28 from Zeb Figura <z.figura12(a)gmail.com> --- *** Bug 55280 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19816 soredake <broaden_acid002(a)simplelogin.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|broaden_acid002(a)simplelogin | |.com | -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
participants (2)
-
wine-bugs＠winehq.org -
WineHQ Bugzilla