[Bug 22387] New: Wine fails to work when compiled with GCC 4.5.0 and certain GCC flags
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22387 Summary: Wine fails to work when compiled with GCC 4.5.0 and certain GCC flags Product: Wine Version: 1.1.43 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: critical Priority: P2 Component: comctl32 AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: t.artem(a)mailcity.com Created an attachment (id=27400) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=27400) Backtrace I have just compiled Wine with the following CFLAGS: -march=native -O2 -pipe -ftree-vectorize (which on my PC translate to -march=atom -mcx16 -msahf -maes -mpclmul -mpopcnt -msse4.2 --param l1-cache-size=32 --param l1-cache-line-size=64 --param l2-cache-size=4096 -mtune=core2) using recently released GCC 4.5.0. Now all non-native applications fail to start. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22387 Marcus Meissner <marcus(a)jet.franken.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |marcus(a)jet.franken.de --- Comment #1 from Marcus Meissner <marcus(a)jet.franken.de> 2010-04-17 06:35:42 --- yet another alignment issue. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22387 --- Comment #2 from Artem S. Tashkinov <t.artem(a)mailcity.com> 2010-04-17 06:47:44 --- Created an attachment (id=27401) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=27401) disas CreateMappedBitmap; disas; disas; disas -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22387 Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #3 from Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org> 2010-04-17 08:52:36 --- gcc bug. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 22316 *** -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22387 Vitaliy Margolen <vitaliy(a)kievinfo.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED --- Comment #4 from Vitaliy Margolen <vitaliy(a)kievinfo.com> 2010-04-17 10:35:24 --- Closing dup. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22387 Vitaliy Margolen <vitaliy(a)kievinfo.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|comctl32 |-unknown Severity|critical |normal --- Comment #5 from Vitaliy Margolen <vitaliy(a)kievinfo.com> 2010-04-17 10:35:47 --- http://bugs.winehq.org/page.cgi?id=fields.html#bug_severity -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22387 --- Comment #6 from Dmitry Timoshkov <dmitry(a)codeweavers.com> 2010-04-19 22:58:39 --- In future please find a better place to file this kind of bugs. If you believe that if someone miscompiles Wine code that's a Wine bug, then something is very wrong with your logic. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22387 --- Comment #7 from Artem S. Tashkinov <t.artem(a)mailcity.com> 2010-04-20 02:36:36 --- Dmitry, I vividly remember bug 2488 which was indeed a wine's problem, rather than GCC's one, so I posted this bug thinking that there's a subtle bug in Wine's code. If you tell me to refrain from posting GCC related bugs I'll do so. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22387 --- Comment #8 from Dmitry Timoshkov <dmitry(a)codeweavers.com> 2010-04-20 03:11:25 --- (In reply to comment #7)
Dmitry, I vividly remember bug 2488 which was indeed a wine's problem, rather than GCC's one, so I posted this bug thinking that there's a subtle bug in Wine's code.
Of course it's very nice that you remember a bug you reported 6 years ago. However it's pretty strange that you have filed bug 22377 and bug 22385 which have been resolved as invalid with direct link to the gcc bug, and then you report this bug 22387. Marcus in the Comment #1 clearly said once again what's the source of the problem, and even after that your memory can't recognize some "vaguely similar" symptom of the problem?
If you tell me to refrain from posting GCC related bugs I'll do so.
Just a suggestion though, if you prefer for some reason to use your own custom compilation flags (although it's been stated many times that it's not recommended) with a bleeding edge gcc, then you could at least take some efforts to investigate the problem on your own, not dump it on somebody else's shoulders right away. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22387 --- Comment #9 from Artem S. Tashkinov <t.artem(a)mailcity.com> 2010-04-20 03:26:52 --- (In reply to comment #8)
(In reply to comment #7)
Point taken - I'm going back to GCC 4.2.4 which has never caused any problems for me. BTW, I'm not using any extreme GCC flags, for the last few years I compile all sources either with: C Compiler flags: -march=pentium2 -O2 -pipe -ftree-vectorize C++ Compiler flags: -march=pentium2 -O2 -pipe -ftree-vectorize Linker flags: -Wl,-O1 -Wl,--hash-style=gnu -Wl,--enable-new-dtags or with: C Compiler flags: -march=native -O2 -pipe -ftree-vectorize C++ Compiler flags: -march=native -O2 -pipe -ftree-vectorize Linker flags: -Wl,-O1 -Wl,--hash-style=gnu -Wl,--enable-new-dtags Anyway, it looks like GCC is kinda degrading because these innocuous flags cause some much stir, however Linux kernel works nicely having compiled with the aforementioned flags (albeit without -ftree-vectorize). -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22387 Dan Kegel <dank(a)kegel.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dank(a)kegel.com --- Comment #10 from Dan Kegel <dank(a)kegel.com> 2010-11-07 07:04:07 CST --- Artem, does gcc-4.5.1 behave any better for you? If not, does -mstackrealign help? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22387 --- Comment #11 from Artem S. Tashkinov <t.artem(a)mailcity.com> 2010-11-07 07:27:54 CST --- Created an attachment (id=31777) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=31777) crash log No, all applications still crash and I'm using not yet releases GCC 4.5.2 from SVN ;) I will now try to use -mstackrealign flag. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22387 --- Comment #12 from Artem S. Tashkinov <t.artem(a)mailcity.com> 2010-11-07 07:42:31 CST --- OK, -mstackrealign solves this problem. PS Meanwhile I just don't compile wine using -ftree-vectorize any longer. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
participants (1)
-
wine-bugs＠winehq.org