[Bug 9777] New: Silencer doesn't fully connect to lobby server.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9777 Summary: Silencer doesn't fully connect to lobby server. Product: Wine Version: 0.9.45. Platform: PC-x86-64 OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: wine-net AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: oshecho(a)gmail.com Created an attachment (id=8220) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=8220) some debug logging when trying to connect to the lobby server The game Silencer has just became playable again(the servers went down for several years). When you try to join the lobby, it gets disconnected right away and end up in the lobby but disconnected, you can't join or make any games. The game can be downloaded from here: http://community.arsia-mons.com/index.php?showtopic=161 It appers to be some problem with winsock: http://community.arsia-mons.com/index.php?showtopic=188&st=0&p=2275 I have tried wine versions 0.9.45 through 0.9.39. Anything less than 0.9.40 wont even run the tutorials for me. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9777 --- Comment #1 from Kai Blin <blin(a)gmx.net> 2007-09-26 09:15:00 --- Cam you please attach a +winsock log so I can see what winsock is doing? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9777 --- Comment #2 from Brandon Singer <oshecho(a)gmail.com> 2007-09-26 11:49:29 --- I was just about to ask how to do that, but then I search. Something like this right? WINEDEBUG=+winsock wine Silencer.exe >& winsock.log I will do that as soon as the server is back up(power-outage or something). -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9777 --- Comment #3 from Brandon Singer <oshecho(a)gmail.com> 2007-09-26 18:57:04 --- Created an attachment (id=8227) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=8227) winsock debug output Output of "WINEDEBUG=+winsock wine Silencer.exe >& winsock.log" attached -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9777 Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #4 from Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> 2007-10-21 01:45:19 --- Confirming in wine 0.9.47, kubuntu gusty. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9777 Pol <remember.pol(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |remember.pol(a)gmail.com --- Comment #5 from Pol <remember.pol(a)gmail.com> 2007-11-16 17:29:16 --- *** Bug 10473 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9777 --- Comment #6 from Pol <remember.pol(a)gmail.com> 2007-11-16 17:31:23 --- I'm currently running git regression testing between v0.9.25 and 0.9.49. Silencer works without problems on Debian stable's v0.9.25 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9777 --- Comment #7 from Kai Blin <blin(a)gmx.net> 2007-11-17 02:58:34 --- Just following a hunch, can someone test this with wine 0.9.45? This was before the IOCompletion support was started. Incomplete IOCompletion support caused some trouble in Warcraft3 as well. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9777 Pol <remember.pol(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |damjan.jov(a)gmail.com --- Comment #8 from Pol <remember.pol(a)gmail.com> 2007-11-17 16:14:17 --- e39dca6af6c87a30ab1d907c0468de2602a6e442 is first bad commit commit e39dca6af6c87a30ab1d907c0468de2602a6e442 Author: Damjan Jovanovic <damjan.jov(a)gmail.com> Date: Thu Mar 22 08:03:28 2007 +0200 ws2_32: WSASendTo should always re-enable the FD_WRITE event. :040000 040000 9a25d3ff24ba2c77e5217849b7c9e817fa5257a6 e5837be74426dba45e3d432a87cfc0a72b63dff7 M dlls -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9777 --- Comment #9 from Pol <remember.pol(a)gmail.com> 2007-11-17 19:21:57 --- This means that 0.9.33 is the latest debian stable version that will work with Silencer because the patch that broke it was committed on March 22nd, and 0.9.33 was released before March 19th... But what we really need is someone (probably the patch author--Damjan Jovanovic <damjan.jov(a)gmail.com>) to write a patch which will revert the damage but still keep the old patch's functionality for other programs so that Silencer can work in future versions of wine without a problem. ;x -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9777 --- Comment #10 from Damjan Jovanovic <damjan.jov(a)gmail.com> 2007-11-19 00:17:51 --- My FD_WRITE event patch fixed bug 7685 (where the emule web interface stops loading), so I'm reluctant to just back it out. Looks like I'll have to do further tests. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9777 --- Comment #11 from Kai Blin <kai.blin(a)gmail.com> 2008-05-25 04:32:19 --- Any news on this one? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9777 --- Comment #12 from Pol <remember.pol(a)gmail.com> 2008-05-27 03:33:47 --- (In reply to comment #11)
Any news on this one?
As far as I know this bug still exists, and it's a pretty pressing issue ... It basically means that I'm going to have to compile custom version of wine1.0+ with the e39dca6af6c87a30ab1d907c0468de2602a6e442 commit patch reverted. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9777 --- Comment #13 from Pol <remember.pol(a)gmail.com> 2008-05-27 05:42:55 --- ps, some newer wine versions cause weird blitting grahics in silencer mainly when switching schene graphs ... 0.9.60 and 1.0rc1 do this for sure, but i'm not sure about 0.9.58. i'm current compiling 0.9.60 with test_write_events(); taken out of dlls/ws2_32/tests/sock.c obviously like i said i'm just planning on running the latest wine with the patch for bug#7685 reverted, but once i get to that point and it works, then i will test the 'break-patch' line by line so i can pinpoint the exact error and possibly come up with a solution. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9777 --- Comment #14 from Pol <remember.pol(a)gmail.com> 2008-05-27 18:48:46 --- ps, bug#9771 seems similar to this -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9777 --- Comment #15 from Hamelin <Hamelin(a)gmail.com> 2008-06-13 19:55:55 --- Any progress on this? I'm not really good with this technical stuff and I wouldn't know how to revert a patch or anything like that. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9777 --- Comment #16 from Pol <remember.pol(a)gmail.com> 2008-06-13 20:56:18 --- (In reply to comment #15)
Any progress on this? I'm not really good with this technical stuff and I wouldn't know how to revert a patch or anything like that.
Well. 1.0rc2 compiles and runs (seemingly) just fine with 'test_write_events();' commented out of the 'Main program' section in dlls/ws2_32/tests/sock.c.. This fixes this bug. I now realize that test_write_events() is defined in the same file so my next course of action is to upgrade to latest git version and then comment out lines within the test_write_events() definition instead of the call to the function itself. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9777 --- Comment #17 from Kai Blin <kai.blin(a)gmail.com> 2008-06-14 02:10:49 --- (In reply to comment #16)
Well. 1.0rc2 compiles and runs (seemingly) just fine with 'test_write_events();' commented out of the 'Main program' section in dlls/ws2_32/tests/sock.c..
This fixes this bug.
I now realize that test_write_events() is defined in the same file so my next course of action is to upgrade to latest git version and then comment out lines within the test_write_events() definition instead of the call to the function itself.
I'm really curious about how disabling a test that's never run during normal Wine operation fixes this issue. However, I'm positive this test isn't 100% valid, as it fails on Windows XP and newer. Looking forward to your test results. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9777 --- Comment #18 from Pol <remember.pol(a)gmail.com> 2008-06-15 01:16:45 --- (In reply to comment #17)
(In reply to comment #16)
Well. 1.0rc2 compiles and runs (seemingly) just fine with 'test_write_events();' commented out of the 'Main program' section in dlls/ws2_32/tests/sock.c..
This fixes this bug.
I now realize that test_write_events() is defined in the same file so my next course of action is to upgrade to latest git version and then comment out lines within the test_write_events() definition instead of the call to the function itself.
I'm really curious about how disabling a test that's never run during normal Wine operation fixes this issue. However, I'm positive this test isn't 100% valid, as it fails on Windows XP and newer.
Looking forward to your test results.
Define 'normal'? Because this test is obviously being run in this context, otherwise this bug entry would not exist! Also, what do you mean 'fails on Windows XP and newer'? This also doesn't seem to make sense in this context. Why would one be running Silencer via wine on top of Windows XP via MinGW/Cygwin? Seriously if you're testing this bug by running Windows XP natively. You should ...go `fsck` yourself. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9777 --- Comment #19 from Kai Blin <kai.blin(a)gmail.com> 2008-06-15 18:28:57 --- (In reply to comment #18)
Define 'normal'? Because this test is obviously being run in this context, otherwise this bug entry would not exist!
Look, the test cases are run if you run "make test" in the Wine source tree, and if you run winetest.exe in Wine or Windows. They're not linked into ws2_32.dll, or at least they shouldn't be.
Also, what do you mean 'fails on Windows XP and newer'?
Just whay I said. The test you mention is failing on Windows XP or newer. So it looks like Wine does something wrong there, which is why I'm waiting ob your test results.
This also doesn't seem to make sense in this context.
Why would one be running Silencer via wine on top of Windows XP via MinGW/Cygwin?
I never said that. I'm talking about the conformance test suite, dlls/ws2_32/tests/sock.c is part of that.
Seriously if you're testing this bug by running Windows XP natively. You should ...go `fsck` yourself.
Can we please behave like grown-ups here? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9777 --- Comment #20 from Damjan Jovanovic <damjan.jov(a)gmail.com> 2008-07-27 14:28:23 --- Created an attachment (id=15103) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=15103) Improve FD_WRITE triggering Well reading the eMule code better reveals that the software makes the assumption that all short sends imply a full send buffer, and thus imply a future FD_WRITE event. I think things are different on wine, and it's possible to get a short write without the send buffer being full and thus never get a FD_WRITE event expected in the future. Changing FD_WRITE to be enabled on both EWOULDBLOCK and short sends, as opposed to the current way of enabling it on every single send, appears not to regress eMule's web interface. Could you please try this patch and see if it improves Silencer as well? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9777 Damjan Jovanovic <damjan.jov(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #15103|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #21 from Damjan Jovanovic <damjan.jov(a)gmail.com> 2008-07-27 14:35:21 --- Created an attachment (id=15104) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=15104) Improve FD_WRITE triggering Sorry, try this one instead. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9777 --- Comment #22 from Pol <remember.pol(a)gmail.com> 2008-09-07 23:26:59 --- Tested this with the latest wine-git. $ cat VERSION Wine version 1.1.4 This patch works. 100%. Win. Please submit for inclusion for next release of Wine. Thanks Damjan! (In reply to comment #21)
Created an attachment (id=15104) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=15104) [details] Improve FD_WRITE triggering
Sorry, try this one instead.
-- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9777 Damjan Jovanovic <damjan.jov(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED --- Comment #23 from Damjan Jovanovic <damjan.jov(a)gmail.com> 2008-09-08 08:32:36 --- Patch is now in latest Git -> closing FIXED. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9777 --- Comment #24 from Pol <remember.pol(a)gmail.com> 2008-09-18 02:15:48 --- Err note though... this patch _does_ allow Silencer to connect to the server and see other players and games running ... but it results in _very_ lagged (unplayable) gameplay where you get a horrible lag spike every single second. Running wine 0.9.33 results in smooth, non-lagged gameplay, as does running latest Wine with 'test_write_events();' commented out of the 'Main program' section in dlls/ws2_32/tests/sock.c -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9777 --- Comment #25 from Damjan Jovanovic <damjan.jov(a)gmail.com> 2008-09-18 02:30:04 --- The dlls/ws2_32/tests/sock.c file doesn't participate in gameplay in any way. Commenting a test out should have absolutely no effect. Only the patch to dlls/ws2_32/socket.c changes something. Start with a clean installation and if it still happens, please attach a +winsock trace. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9777 --- Comment #26 from Pol <remember.pol(a)gmail.com> 2008-09-18 02:35:55 --- I _promise_ you. commenting out that line works. also it was i clean install. and i'm about to run a winsock debug right now -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9777 --- Comment #27 from Pol <remember.pol(a)gmail.com> 2008-09-18 03:21:54 --- odd .. these spikes seem to have stopped entirely. but it was very odd because I was connected to a server on the LAN .. if I notice anything like this again I'll go straight away to grab a winsock log. until then! Thanks again! -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9777 --- Comment #28 from Pol <remember.pol(a)gmail.com> 2008-09-18 03:30:09 --- actually.. i have another revelation concerning this matter... it has something to do with software CPU scaling. .... My full CPU clockspeed is 2.26 Ghz, but I usually have it clocked down to 82% (1.86 Ghz).. If I run Silencer with wine-git at 82% then I get these weird lag spikes every other second .. If I run at 100% then I get no lag spikes. Also, for further note .. if I run at 82% on wine v0.9.33 or 0.9.25... then I _don't_ get spikes .. I get good game-play. Possibly some new bug introduced since v0.9.33 .. I guess I can regression test this, eventually. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9777 Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED --- Comment #29 from Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org> 2008-09-19 11:16:39 --- Closing bugs fixed in 1.1.5. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9777 --- Comment #30 from Pol <remember.pol(a)gmail.com> 2008-09-20 13:22:12 --- Also for extra note ... Silencer runs at ~= 100% CPU, always .. (And I don't think this is the case if run natively on Windows) I think this might have something to do with it: http://wiki.winehq.org/DIBEngine -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9777 Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|--- |1.0.1 --- Comment #31 from Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org> 2008-10-16 08:00:09 --- Fixed by b904dd783cd2b7368e11882e37b90e7da23b73be, nominating for 1.0.1. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
participants (1)
-
wine-bugs＠winehq.org