[Bug 39612] New: xcopy output has wrong capitalization
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39612 Bug ID: 39612 Summary: xcopy output has wrong capitalization Product: Wine Version: 1.7.53 Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor Priority: P2 Component: programs Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: fiendishx(a)gmail.com Distribution: --- Wine xcopy prints "<#> file(s) copied" with a lowercase f, but Windows XP's xcopy prints "<#> File(s) copied" with a capital F. I noticed because it broke a script of mine that extracts that last print statement. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39612 Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |download, patch Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #1 from Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> --- https://source.winehq.org/patches/data/116750 -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39612 Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |austinenglish(a)gmail.com -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39612 Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |WONTFIX --- Comment #2 from Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> --- WONTFIX, see https://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2015-December/110708.html -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39612 --- Comment #3 from fiendishx(a)gmail.com --- (In reply to Austin English from comment #2)
WONTFIX, see https://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2015-December/110708.html
Huh. That feels like a bizarre decision. I don't understand how it can be marked wontfix (after the fix patch was already created, no less) based on an assumption about the realness or distribution of the script in question rather than on the actual presence of a difference between behavior in Wine vs Windows. If I say that thousands of people have distribution of the software in question that includes the script does that change how real it is? I think that's the wrong benchmark. :\ -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39612 Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED --- Comment #4 from Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> --- (In reply to fiendishx from comment #3)
(In reply to Austin English from comment #2)
WONTFIX, see https://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2015-December/110708.html
Huh. That feels like a bizarre decision.
I don't understand how it can be marked wontfix (after the fix patch was already created, no less) based on an assumption about the realness or distribution of the script in question rather than on the actual presence of a difference between behavior in Wine vs Windows. If I say that thousands of people have distribution of the software in question that includes the script does that change how real it is? I think that's the wrong benchmark. :\
It's partially due to copyrights. It can be permissible to copy if it is for interoperability, but not 'just because'. Published/popular applications have a stronger claim than a script for personal use that can be easily edited (unlike a compiled binary application). I know that doesn't help in your case, sorry about that, but wanted to give some explanation. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
participants (1)
-
wine-bugs＠winehq.org