[Bug 28276] New: Crysis2 crashes on startup since commit 006413afe495fbf73542154462885e4fdbf12a2a
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28276 Summary: Crysis2 crashes on startup since commit 006413afe495fbf73542154462885e4fdbf12a2a Product: Wine Version: 1.3.27 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ntdll AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: rockorequin(a)hotmail.com Crysis 2 crashes shortly after the startup screen appears ever since wine 1.3.26-213. Bisecting shows this as the problem: 006413afe495fbf73542154462885e4fdbf12a2a is the first bad commit commit 006413afe495fbf73542154462885e4fdbf12a2a Author: Grazvydas Ignotas <notasas(a)gmail.com> Date: Thu Aug 4 23:24:49 2011 +0300 ntdll: Use swapping method to return . and .. as first entries. :040000 040000 cb445dd153f9b57d3a2e7cc71206441d0530fdf3 5e84ecb0723072147d39a7be912139f962db85df M dlls Reverting this commit fixes the problem in the latest wine wine-1.3.27-330-g6802bfc. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28276 Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |regression CC| |notasas(a)gmail.com Summary|Crysis2 crashes on startup |Crysis2 crashes on startup |since commit | |006413afe495fbf735421544628 | |85e4fdbf12a2a | Regression SHA1| |006413afe495fbf735421544628 | |85e4fdbf12a2a -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28276 --- Comment #1 from Grazvydas Ignotas <notasas(a)gmail.com> 2011-09-06 05:02:51 CDT --- Can you get a backtrace? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28276 --- Comment #2 from rocko <rockorequin(a)hotmail.com> 2011-09-07 08:20:26 CDT --- I don't get a crash with backtrace, just an error: wine client error:2e: write: Bad file descriptor Which debug channel should I turn on to get more information? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28276 --- Comment #3 from Grazvydas Ignotas <notasas(a)gmail.com> 2011-09-09 08:16:21 CDT --- Could you run it under winedbg instead? It basically works the same as wine, you just use "winedbg something.exe", then it should stop in a prompt, where you can type "c" to continue. After some time it should either print a backtrace for you, or prompt again where you can enter "bt" to get the backtrace. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28276 --- Comment #4 from Grazvydas Ignotas <notasas(a)gmail.com> 2011-09-09 08:35:09 CDT --- Created an attachment (id=36292) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=36292) log This patch should produce a log that should help to understand what's going on. Run it without any special debug channels, just don't disable default fixme channel. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28276 --- Comment #5 from rocko <rockorequin(a)hotmail.com> 2011-09-09 20:55:18 CDT --- Created an attachment (id=36302) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=36302) requested log output Here's the log output with that patch applied. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28276 Grazvydas Ignotas <notasas(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #36292|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #6 from Grazvydas Ignotas <notasas(a)gmail.com> 2011-09-10 11:06:56 CDT --- Created an attachment (id=36318) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=36318) log2 Thanks, it seems ".." is returned twice on your machine, but it's still unclear why. Here is more verbose patch, could you run it with this patch instead? Also, was this really the game being run? "wine client error" message you reported before is missing, for example. It would also help if you tried to get a backtrace, as described in comment 3. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28276 --- Comment #7 from rocko <rockorequin(a)hotmail.com> 2011-09-11 03:06:59 CDT --- Created an attachment (id=36324) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=36324) more detailed crash log Here's a crash log running with the second patch applied. This time I haven't edited out the wine client error line. The underlying filesystem is btrfs. Could that make a difference? I tried using winedbg, but now the application is just exiting instead of saying that Crysis2 has crashed and must be terminated. So now winedbg says that it is no longer attached to a process and can't generate a backtrace. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28276 --- Comment #8 from Grazvydas Ignotas <notasas(a)gmail.com> 2011-09-11 19:29:13 CDT --- Created an attachment (id=36332) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=36332) btrfs workaround Thanks, it seems to be btrfs bug, I've sent a fix for btrfs people: http://marc.info/?t=131577377600003&r=1&w=2 Meanwhile you can use this wine workaround, but it's not really suitable for upstream.. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28276 --- Comment #9 from rocko <rockorequin(a)hotmail.com> 2011-09-11 19:42:29 CDT --- I can confirm the workaround works fine, thanks! I guess that this means it won't be fixed in btrfs until at least kernel 3.2? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28276 --- Comment #10 from Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> 2011-09-12 12:49:51 CDT --- FWIW, a user in #winehq had a similar problem with Dead Island/brtfs and the patch here helped them as well. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28276 Frédéric Delanoy <frederic.delanoy(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |wolfgang.scheicher(a)gmail.co | |m --- Comment #11 from Frédéric Delanoy <frederic.delanoy(a)gmail.com> 2011-09-17 08:56:00 CDT --- *** Bug 28410 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28276 --- Comment #12 from Saulius K. <saulius2(a)gmail.com> 2011-10-04 14:49:03 CDT --- I'd say this isn't a regression, but rather BTRFS bug report triggered by completion of NtQueryDirectoryFile() implementation. So I'd mark this as RESOLVED to INVALID (since I see no more appropriate keyword like a non-existent NOTAWINEBUG, eg.) -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28276 Saulius K. <saulius2(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |saulius2(a)gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28276 Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords|regression | Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution| |INVALID --- Comment #13 from Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> 2011-10-04 15:25:18 CDT --- (In reply to comment #12)
I'd say this isn't a regression, but rather BTRFS bug report triggered by completion of NtQueryDirectoryFile() implementation.
Yes, not a regression.
So I'd mark this as RESOLVED to INVALID (since I see no more appropriate keyword like a non-existent NOTAWINEBUG, eg.)
Yeah, INVALID. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28276 Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Regression SHA1|006413afe495fbf735421544628 | |85e4fdbf12a2a | -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28276 Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED --- Comment #14 from Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> 2011-10-04 15:25:54 CDT --- Closing. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
participants (1)
-
wine-bugs＠winehq.org