[Bug 16688] New: tests/rsaenh: array size smaller than bound length
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16688 Summary: tests/rsaenh: array size smaller than bound length Product: Wine Version: 1.1.11 Platform: PC OS/Version: OpenBSD Status: NEW Keywords: source, testcase Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: build-env AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: austinenglish(a)gmail.com bash-3.2$ make ccache gcc -c -I. -I. -I../../../include -I../../../include -D_REENTRANT -fPIC -Wall -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -Wwrite-strings -Wpointer-arith -I/usr/local/include -g -O2 -o rsaenh.o rsaenh.c rsaenh.c: In function `test_block_cipher_modes': rsaenh.c:462: warning: array size (23) smaller than bound length (24) OpenBSD 4.4, gcc 3.3.5 (propolice) -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16688 Juan Lang <juan_lang(a)yahoo.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |juan_lang(a)yahoo.com --- Comment #1 from Juan Lang <juan_lang(a)yahoo.com> 2009-11-11 15:45:11 --- This was pretty minor, since reading past a static array will succeed when there are more static data afterward, which there are in this case. The extra byte also wasn't encrypted, so the tests didn't actually depend on there being a "magic" value in the last byte of abData. Still, patch sent: http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2009-November/081202.html -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16688 Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED --- Comment #2 from Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> 2009-11-12 11:31:22 --- (In reply to comment #1)
This was pretty minor, since reading past a static array will succeed when there are more static data afterward, which there are in this case. The extra byte also wasn't encrypted, so the tests didn't actually depend on there being a "magic" value in the last byte of abData.
OpenBSD being a bit proactive ;-).
Still, patch sent: http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2009-November/081202.html
Committed: http://source.winehq.org/git/wine.git/?a=commitdiff;h=9369dfbab6554abed3bc3a... Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16688 Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED --- Comment #3 from Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org> 2009-11-13 12:43:32 --- Closing bugs fixed in 1.1.33. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
participants (1)
-
wine-bugs＠winehq.org