[Bug 33019] New: PDH does not support the 'Object Index' when creating strings
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33019 Bug #: 33019 Summary: PDH does not support the 'Object Index' when creating strings Product: Wine Version: 1.5.24 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: pdh AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: ehoover(a)mines.edu Classification: Unclassified PDH allows for performance counters to be specified to address a particular object. For example, on a machine with multiple processors one uses the index-specific string: \Processor(_Total#0)\% Processor Time rather than the generic string: \Processor(_Total)\% Processor Time Silverlight uses these index-specific strings to construct the processor time string, which poses a problem since this is not currently implemented. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33019 --- Comment #1 from Erich Hoover <ehoover(a)mines.edu> 2013-02-19 10:13:32 CST --- Created attachment 43639 --> http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=43639 pdh: Hack the 'Processor' index string for Silverlight. Hack around the problem for Silverlight (will break other other apps). -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33019 Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |patch -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33019 --- Comment #2 from Gijs Vermeulen <gijsvrm(a)gmail.com> --- Since bug 33018 was marked invalid, is this one invalid as well? -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33019 Erich E. Hoover <erich.e.hoover(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |INVALID --- Comment #3 from Erich E. Hoover <erich.e.hoover(a)gmail.com> --- Yes, it's always possible that some other application will need this functionality - but fortunately just because a bug is resolved/closed doesn't mean someone can't find it by searching ;) -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33019 Ken Sharp <imwellcushtymelike(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED --- Comment #4 from Ken Sharp <imwellcushtymelike(a)gmail.com> --- Closing bugs marked as invalid -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
participants (2)
-
wine-bugs＠winehq.org -
WineHQ Bugzilla