[Bug 35190] New: MegaMari: v1.61 slower than v1.5.16
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35190 Bug ID: 35190 Summary: MegaMari: v1.61 slower than v1.5.16 Product: Wine Version: 1.6.1 Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: _vi(a)list.ru Classification: Unclassified MegaMari ( http://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?sClass=version&iId=14196 ) runs more or less fine with wine-1.5.16 (build from source code), but runs too slow with Debian-provided wine-1.6.1. It looks the same we as if run with wine-1.5.16 on slow Inet Atom computer - CPU-bound. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35190 --- Comment #1 from Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> --- This is your friendly reminder that there has been no bug activity for over a year. Is this still an issue in current (1.7.37 or newer) wine? If so, please attach the terminal output in 1.7.37 (see http://wiki.winehq.org/FAQ#get_log). -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35190 super_man(a)post.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |super_man(a)post.com --- Comment #2 from super_man(a)post.com --- This bug report doesnt have much value without regression testing. Also the bug should be tried against 1.7 series of wine. It might already be fixed. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35190 --- Comment #3 from _vi(a)list.ru --- On v1.7.46 it is also slow. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35190 --- Comment #4 from _vi(a)list.ru --- Terminal output for v1.7.46: fixme:ole:RemUnknown_QueryInterface No interface for iid {00000019-0000-0000-c000-000000000046} fixme:win:EnumDisplayDevicesW ((null),0,0x33f7f8,0x00000000), stub! err:d3d:wined3d_sampler_init >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GL_INVALID_ENUM (0x500) from sampler creation @ sampler.c / 101 The second line (EnumDisplayDevicesW) also being printed with wine-1.5.16. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35190 winetest(a)luukku.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |winetest(a)luukku.com --- Comment #5 from winetest(a)luukku.com --- You said that you build wine from source. Then you should be able to do regression testing. See WINE FAQ for details. It would point the exact commit that broke the speed. This is just quesswork without commit id. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35190 --- Comment #6 from _vi(a)list.ru --- The problem may be not important anymore. With wine 1.8.5 it also works better. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35190 winetest(a)luukku.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |00cpxxx(a)gmail.com --- Comment #7 from winetest(a)luukku.com --- (In reply to _vi from comment #6)
The problem may be not important anymore. With wine 1.8.5 it also works better.
Have you upgraded hardware meanwhile that could impact the speed? If you think this is fixed, mark it so. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35190 winetest(a)luukku.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dimesio(a)earthlink.net -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35190 winetest(a)luukku.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |_vi(a)list.ru -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35190 --- Comment #8 from _vi(a)list.ru --- Still slower with Wine 3.3 compared to Wine 1.5.16. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35190 joaopa <jeremielapuree(a)yahoo.fr> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jeremielapuree(a)yahoo.fr --- Comment #9 from joaopa <jeremielapuree(a)yahoo.fr> --- Without regression testing, no chance that this bug is fixed soon. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
participants (1)
-
wine-bugs＠winehq.org