[Bug 30634] New: SymInitialize process handle instead of process id in W9x mode
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30634 Bug #: 30634 Summary: SymInitialize process handle instead of process id in W9x mode Product: Wine Version: 1.3.32 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: dbghelp AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: benito(a)benibela.de Classification: Unclassified The wine dbghelp SymInitialize functions only works, when the process handle is passed to it, even in Windows 9x compatibility mode. But the (old) Platform SDK says explicitely: hProcess [in] Handle to the process for which symbols are to be maintained. If the application is a debugger, use the process handle for the object being debugged, otherwise use the GetCurrentProcess function to obtain the process handle. **Windows 95/98/Me**: Use the process identifier, not the process handle. (and it seems to be implemented that way) -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30634 --- Comment #1 from Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org> 2012-05-09 16:54:41 CDT --- Is there an application that depends on this? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30634 --- Comment #2 from Benito van der Zander <benito(a)benibela.de> 2012-05-09 17:07:00 CDT --- Not yet, but I'm writing one. If it crashes on Windows, it should print its own backtrace. And it is faster to cross compile it and test it with WINE, than to compile in a VM. (by the way there is an other problem that it either prints the correct addresses or the correct symbols, but not both; but I don't know yet, if it is your fault or mine ) -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30634 --- Comment #3 from Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org> 2012-05-10 00:48:11 CDT --- Unless you are writing an app that requires win9x, there's nothing to fix here. Our goal is not to support win9x beyond the strict minimum required to run apps that can't run in a different mode. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30634 André H. <nerv(a)dawncrow.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC| |nerv(a)dawncrow.de Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #4 from André H. <nerv(a)dawncrow.de> 2013-02-12 09:55:44 CST --- AJ said -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30634 Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED --- Comment #5 from Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> 2013-03-09 17:28:17 CST --- Closing. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
participants (1)
-
wine-bugs＠winehq.org