[Bug 57618] New: Using MaxQDA 24 is impossible, because test license code is not accepted
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57618 Bug ID: 57618 Summary: Using MaxQDA 24 is impossible, because test license code is not accepted Product: Wine Version: 10.0-rc1 Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: k_nickel(a)posteo.de Distribution: --- After starting MaxQDA24 i get to the "Welcome menue". There I Want to start a free trial period - which needs a personal testcode. When klicking on the button "start your free trial", I enter the new testcode and click on the button "activate". Then the program gives me the output "The code you entered is invalid or does not exist. Please check" I could reproduce this more than 5-10 times, with two different testcodes. So under this conditions the programm is useless. Downloadlink for the programm MaxQDA24: https://www.maxqda.com/download/maxqdademo SHA1 Checksum: $ sha1sum MAXQDA24_Setup.msi a4cbd7446b906fad5cc39d6ff8c1f7af5a2008eb MAXQDA24_Setup.msi My distribution "Ubuntu 24.04.1 LTS" -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57618 Almalexia <k_nickel(a)posteo.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Distribution|--- |Ubuntu URL| |https://www.maxqda.com/down | |load/maxqdademo Regression SHA1| |a4cbd7446b906fad5cc39d6ff8c | |1f7af5a2008eb Keywords| |obfuscation -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57618 Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |download --- Comment #1 from Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> --- Please attach the terminal output. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57618 --- Comment #2 from Almalexia <k_nickel(a)posteo.de> --- Created attachment 77738 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=77738 Terminal Output when running MaxQDA, entering the new testcode, which is recognised falsly as false or non-existent -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57618 Louis Lenders <xerox.xerox2000x(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |xerox.xerox2000x(a)gmail.com --- Comment #3 from Louis Lenders <xerox.xerox2000x(a)gmail.com> --- Created attachment 77739 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=77739 screenshot Hi, I gave this a try but got different results. For me the program wouldn't even start-->crash. There was a hanging thread in wbemprox just like I see in your log. thaT looks like a wine bug. The program does several WMI queries, mainly for disks. I disabled mountmgr.sys and now the activation window appeared for me. After I entered the code I got it avtivated just fine for me. There was another crashwindow (qtwebengine) but nevertheless the program started for me (attached screenshot). I could click things/menu etc., didn't test any further
From your log it looks like you first have to fix this:
028c:err:secur32:SECUR32_initSchannelSP no schannel support, expect problems 028c:err:kerberos:kerberos_LsaApInitializePackage no Kerberos support, expect problems -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57618 --- Comment #4 from Louis Lenders <xerox.xerox2000x(a)gmail.com> --- Created attachment 77740 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=77740 +seh,+mountmgr,+wbemprox log +seh,+mountmgr,+wbemprox log -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57618 --- Comment #5 from Rafał Mużyło <galtgendo(a)o2.pl> --- There's something screwy here: going by the sources, the 'no encryption support' comes from not having gnutls, but the failure to dlopen gnutls is not logged in this snippet... -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57618 --- Comment #6 from Rafał Mużyło <galtgendo(a)o2.pl> --- (In reply to Louis Lenders from comment #3) ...Kerberos support might be a problem, but rarely ever is.. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57618 Fabian Maurer <dark.shadow4(a)web.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Regression SHA1|a4cbd7446b906fad5cc39d6ff8c | |1f7af5a2008eb | CC| |dark.shadow4(a)web.de --- Comment #7 from Fabian Maurer <dark.shadow4(a)web.de> --- The SHA1 from the executable is not the same as a regression SHA1, the regression means the git hash. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57618 --- Comment #8 from Almalexia <k_nickel(a)posteo.de> --- (In reply to Louis Lenders from comment #3)
Created attachment 77739 [details] Hi Louis,
thank you for your response. I am really a beginner in this topic, so do you have an idea, how can I fix the two problems you mention? Or at least how can I search for it?
From your log it looks like you first have to fix this:
028c:err:secur32:SECUR32_initSchannelSP no schannel support, expect problems 028c:err:kerberos:kerberos_LsaApInitializePackage no Kerberos support, expect problems
I searched like with this "028c:err:secur32:SECUR32_initSchannelSP no schannel support, expect problems" in Google, but I did not find outputs with the similar errorcode. So, how do I better search in this case? Thank you!!! Almalexia -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57618 --- Comment #9 from Almalexia <k_nickel(a)posteo.de> --- (In reply to Fabian Maurer from comment #7)
The SHA1 from the executable is not the same as a regression SHA1, the regression means the git hash.
Okay, but what do you mean with it? Do I used the false SHA1 terminal command? -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57618 --- Comment #10 from Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> --- (In reply to Almalexia from comment #9)
(In reply to Fabian Maurer from comment #7)
The SHA1 from the executable is not the same as a regression SHA1, the regression means the git hash.
Okay, but what do you mean with it? Do I used the false SHA1 terminal command?
You don't need to do anything. That field is only used for bugs that are regressions (something that used to work, then was broken). If the bug is a regression, that field is for the SHA1 of the commit that caused the bug. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57618 --- Comment #11 from Louis Lenders <xerox.xerox2000x(a)gmail.com> --- (In reply to Almalexia from comment #8)
(In reply to Louis Lenders from comment #3)
Created attachment 77739 [details] Hi Louis,
thank you for your response.
I am really a beginner in this topic, so do you have an idea, how can I fix the two problems you mention? Or at least how can I search for it?
From your log it looks like you first have to fix this:
028c:err:secur32:SECUR32_initSchannelSP no schannel support, expect problems 028c:err:kerberos:kerberos_LsaApInitializePackage no Kerberos support, expect problems
I'm not sure how to fix it, as I never had that first error myself. How did you install wine? I think if you install wine in the normal way on your distro, it should pull in the correct dependencies like libgnutls etc. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57618 --- Comment #12 from Almalexia <k_nickel(a)posteo.de> --- (In reply to Austin English from comment #10)
You don't need to do anything. Okay, thank you for letting me know:)!
-- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57618 --- Comment #13 from Almalexia <k_nickel(a)posteo.de> --- (In reply to Louis Lenders from comment #11)
(In reply to Almalexia from comment #8) I'm not sure how to fix it, as I never had that first error myself. Oh okay.
How did you install wine? First I downloaded wine-10.0-rc1.tar.xz, then I unzipped it and followed the steps in the Readme: QUICK START From the top-level directory of the Wine source (which contains this file), > run: ./configure make
Then either install Wine: make install
I think if you install wine in the normal way on your distro, it should pull in the correct dependencies like libgnutls etc. Okay, but what do you mean with "the normal way"? My first try was using apt-get - but this led to an old wine version, where MaxQDA did not run at all... After it I downloaded the wine package vom wine or github (I do not remember exactly), with this version it started.
So what would be the other way to start the newest version, without compiling etc.? -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
participants (1)
-
WineHQ Bugzilla