[Bug 10742] New: Add AMD Phenom detection to winecfg
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10742 Summary: Add AMD Phenom detection to winecfg Product: Wine Version: 0.9.50. Platform: Other OS/Version: other Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: wine-kernel AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: mdjenkins(a)comcast.net Created an attachment (id=9584) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=9584) cat /proc/cpuinfo Distro: Gentoo Kernel: Gentoo-sources 2.6.23-r3 CPU: AMD Phenom 9600 (/proc/cpuinfo attached) $ winecfg fixme:reg:GetSystemInfo unknown cpu family '16', please report ! (-> setting to 386) -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10742 Michael Jenkins <mdjenkins(a)comcast.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|enhancement |normal OS/Version|other |Linux Platform|Other |PC-x86-64 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10742 Vitaliy Margolen <vitaliy(a)kievinfo.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |minor -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10742 --- Comment #1 from Alexander Nicolaysen Sørnes <alex(a)thehandofagony.com> 2007-12-10 05:43:26 --- Created an attachment (id=9585) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=9585) proposed patch Does the following patch work? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10742 Alexander Nicolaysen Sørnes <alex(a)thehandofagony.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |alex(a)thehandofagony.com -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10742 --- Comment #2 from Michael Jenkins <mdjenkins(a)comcast.net> 2007-12-10 17:57:52 --- Thank you. I'll test the patch later tonight. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10742 Michael Jenkins <mdjenkins(a)comcast.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution| |WORKSFORME --- Comment #3 from Michael Jenkins <mdjenkins(a)comcast.net> 2007-12-11 01:05:33 --- patch applied, built and installed cleanly No more unknown cpu errors Thanks again -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10742 Dmitry Timoshkov <dmitry(a)codeweavers.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |UNCONFIRMED Resolution|WORKSFORME | --- Comment #4 from Dmitry Timoshkov <dmitry(a)codeweavers.com> 2007-12-11 01:17:36 --- The bug can be closed only once it's fixed in the official Wine tree. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10742 Bernd Buschinski <b.buschinski(a)web.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |b.buschinski(a)web.de --- Comment #5 from Bernd Buschinski <b.buschinski(a)web.de> 2008-02-04 11:29:03 --- was it already send to wine-patches? I cant find it on the list. If not can you please send it? :) its not in current git -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10742 --- Comment #6 from Mikolaj Zalewski <mikolaj.zalewski(a)gmail.com> 2008-03-14 11:48:48 --- Created an attachment (id=11378) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=11378) test program The patch was sent to wine-patches but was not accepted to Wine Git. We should check if the values are correct. Could someone with a Phenom run the Project1.exe from the attached archive and tell us the results? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10742 --- Comment #7 from Bernd Buschinski <b.buschinski(a)web.de> 2008-03-14 13:52:32 --- OEM id: 0 Arch: 0 Reserved: 0 #procs: 4 ActiveMsk: 15 ProcType: 586 ProcLevel: 5 ProcRev: 514 with unpatched wine and a AMD Phenom(tm) 9600 Quad-Core Processor or should I run it with patched wine? (todays git) -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10742 Mikolaj Zalewski <mikolaj.zalewski(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mikolaj.zalewski(a)gmail.com --- Comment #8 from Mikolaj Zalewski <mikolaj.zalewski(a)gmail.com> 2008-03-14 17:18:08 --- Sorry, I didn't write it. You were supposed to run it on Windows. We want to know what values Windows returns. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10742 --- Comment #9 from Bernd Buschinski <b.buschinski(a)web.de> 2008-03-15 05:19:12 --- on winxp sp2 OEM id: 0 Arch: 0 Reserved: 0 #procs: 4 ActiveMsk: 15 ProcType: 586 ProcLevel: 16 ProcRev: 514 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10742 --- Comment #10 from Mikolaj Zalewski <mikolaj.zalewski(a)gmail.com> 2008-03-15 07:50:10 --- This explains why this patch wasn't accepted - the dwProcessorType should be PROCESSOR_INTEL_PENTIUM, not PROCESSOR_AMD_X8664 (the latter is probably returned to 64-bit programs running under a 64-bit OS). Also while reading this code I find it quite strange that for Pentium 4 we return wProcessorLevel 6. Is there someone with a Pentium 4 reading this bug that could run the test program on it (under Windows). -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10742 Alexander Nicolaysen Sørnes <alex(a)thehandofagony.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #11 from Alexander Nicolaysen Sørnes <alex(a)thehandofagony.com> 2008-03-15 08:10:58 --- Yes, I can do that. I can also test a Pentium M and possibly get my hands on an AMD Sempron machine. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10742 --- Comment #12 from Mikolaj Zalewski <mikolaj.zalewski(a)gmail.com> 2008-03-15 13:41:50 --- I'd expect that the wProcessorLevel should be the same as the "cpu family" line in /proc/cpuinfo. For Pentium 4 with the current code it isn't so it would be good to check it (especially that for my Athlon 64 that has also a cpu family of 15 the wProcessorLevel should be 15 so the current code produces a wrong result). Of course it would be also nice to test it on more architectures (I've just checked that on a Core 2 it's the same). If you test it on a Sempron you should also tell us if this Sempron is a cut-down version of Athlon XP or Athlon 64 (or provide also the /proc/cpuinfo from Linux). -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10742 --- Comment #13 from Lei Zhang <thestig(a)google.com> 2008-03-15 19:46:30 --- Might be good to check against the list and figure out what you have: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_AMD_Sempron_microprocessors processor names are a horrible mess. :-\ -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10742 Darren Gipson <enema0007(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |enema0007(a)gmail.com --- Comment #14 from Darren Gipson <enema0007(a)gmail.com> 2008-03-16 06:58:36 --- (In reply to comment #1)
Created an attachment (id=9585) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=9585) [details] proposed patch
Does the following patch work?
How do i install this? Im new linux and could not see a topic in the documentation that i found on how to install it. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10742 --- Comment #15 from Mikolaj Zalewski <mikolaj.zalewski(a)gmail.com> 2008-03-16 17:41:30 ---
How do i install this?
You can safly ignore the warning and wait until it is fixed in official Wine. If you really want to apply it you should build Wine from sources and do a 'patch -p1 <file.patch' from the main source directory before building it. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10742 --- Comment #16 from Alexander Nicolaysen Sørnes <alex(a)thehandofagony.com> 2008-03-17 16:57:43 --- Created an attachment (id=11460) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=11460) Pentium 4 info from XP & Linux The 'cpu family' is the same as ProcType for a Pentium 4, too. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10742 --- Comment #17 from Mikolaj Zalewski <mikolaj.zalewski(a)gmail.com> 2008-03-18 12:55:47 --- Thus the correct implementation should do atoi(value) (that way we don't need the switch and there will be no need to patch it again when AMD or Intel releases another processor). The dwProcessorType should be INTEL_PROCESSOR_PENTIUM with an exception for dwProcessorLevel of 3 and 4. Alexander, do you want to code it or should I do it when I will have some time? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10742 --- Comment #18 from Alexander Nicolaysen Sørnes <alex(a)thehandofagony.com> 2008-03-24 10:22:11 --- I can do it. Thanks for the help! -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10742 soxs <schuster.bernhard(a)googlemail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |schuster.bernhard(a)googlemail | |.com --- Comment #19 from soxs <schuster.bernhard(a)googlemail.com> 2008-03-28 16:22:35 --- How far are you with coding? I would like to see this as soon as possible. :-P just got a new phenom -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10742 Goten Xiao <gotenxiao(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |gotenxiao(a)gmail.com --- Comment #20 from Goten Xiao <gotenxiao(a)gmail.com> 2008-03-28 16:28:06 --- So did I. Going to apply the patch and compile Wine so I get interim function, but I'd like to see this implemented before 0.9.60 if at all possible :) -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10742 --- Comment #21 from Michael Jenkins <mdjenkins(a)comcast.net> 2008-03-29 12:35:25 --- Created an attachment (id=11728) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=11728) interim patch cachedsi.dwProcessorType value updated -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10742 --- Comment #22 from Michael Jenkins <mdjenkins(a)comcast.net> 2008-03-29 12:36:25 --- First off I'd like to thank Alexander for the interim bug fix and the rewrite he is working on to keep this from cropping up again, I'd like to offer you a beer for your time. Also Thanks to Dmitry for fixing my mistake of trying to close this bug early. It's my first bug report. While we're waiting for the rewrite though, shouldn't the interim patch be updated on line 11 to read 'cachedsi.dwProcessorType = PROCESSOR_INTEL_PENTIUM;' instead of 'cachedsi.dwProcessorType = PROCESSOR_AMD_X8664' based on the note from Mikolaj? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10742 --- Comment #23 from soxs <schuster.bernhard(a)googlemail.com> 2008-03-29 13:43:53 --- I applied the patch with patch -Np1 < /patch/filename && tools/make_requests and got through make depend && make but checkinstall fails everytime. I am running on 64bit and yes, I allready read the wineon64bithowto. So I can not really test it which version of the patch works... any ideas? The last error Msg is: fakeroot dpkg-buildpackage dpkg-buildpackage: set CPPFLAGS to default value: dpkg-buildpackage: set CFLAGS to default value: -g -O2 dpkg-buildpackage: set CXXFLAGS to default value: -g -O2 dpkg-buildpackage: set FFLAGS to default value: -g -O2 dpkg-buildpackage: set LDFLAGS to default value: -Wl,-Bsymbolic-functions tail: „debian/changelog“ can not be opend to read access: No such file or directory dpkg-buildpackage: Error (or similar): tail of debian/changelog gave Error-Exitstatus 1 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10742 --- Comment #24 from soxs <schuster.bernhard(a)googlemail.com> 2008-03-29 13:51:55 --- trying to do it with checkinstall gives me: ../tools/mkinstalldirs -m 755 /usr/local/include/wine/windows/ddk mkdir /usr/local/include/wine chmod 755 /usr/local/include/wine chmod: While setting access rights for „/usr/local/include/wine“: No such file or directory make[1]: *** [/usr/local/include/wine/windows/ddk] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving Directory '/home/bernhard/Desktop/w/wine-0.9.58/include' make: *** [include/__install__] Error 2 I am trying to compile it on phenom 9500.. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10742 --- Comment #25 from Michael Jenkins <mdjenkins(a)comcast.net> 2008-03-29 14:55:32 --- sox, have you tried running just 'make install' to verify it's not an issue with checkinstall? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10742 --- Comment #26 from soxs <schuster.bernhard(a)googlemail.com> 2008-03-29 14:56:57 --- no, sry, did not do it so far -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10742 --- Comment #27 from soxs <schuster.bernhard(a)googlemail.com> 2008-03-29 15:01:47 --- make install worked, at least it did not return any error but I must say, that the second patch does not work, at least not for me. I did not test the first one. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10742 --- Comment #28 from Michael Jenkins <mdjenkins(a)comcast.net> 2008-03-29 15:50:37 --- (In reply to comment #27)
make install worked, at least it did not return any error but I must say, that the second patch does not work, at least not for me. I did not test the first one.
both patches work for me. I moved the patch to the top directory of the wine source and ran `patch -p1 < /path_to_wine_source_directory/patch_filename`. The difference between the two patches is the value set for dwProcessorType. I only modified the first patch Alexander provided so this value would be set to PROCESSOR_INTEL_PENTIUM instead of PROCESSOR_AMD_X8664 based on the information provided by Mikolaj. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10742 --- Comment #29 from soxs <schuster.bernhard(a)googlemail.com> 2008-03-30 06:20:23 --- dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot worked to compile wine with patch #2 and it does not give me any errors about undsupported cpu type. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10742 Alexander Nicolaysen Sørnes <alex(a)thehandofagony.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #9585 is|0 |1 obsolete| | --- Comment #30 from Alexander Nicolaysen Sørnes <alex(a)thehandofagony.com> 2008-03-30 08:24:48 --- Created an attachment (id=11739) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=11739) Updated patch This patch was sent to wine-patches. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10742 Michael Jenkins <mdjenkins(a)comcast.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #11728|0 |1 is obsolete| | -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10742 --- Comment #31 from Michael Jenkins <mdjenkins(a)comcast.net> 2008-03-30 09:54:41 --- (In reply to comment #30)
Created an attachment (id=11739) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=11739) [details] Updated patch
This patch was sent to wine-patches.
Thanks, it patched, built and installed clean for me. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10742 --- Comment #32 from soxs <schuster.bernhard(a)googlemail.com> 2008-03-30 12:14:40 --- Latest patch works for me aswell fine, no more errors regarding unknown cpu familiy. Thx a lot! -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10742 Armin Schuster <armin.schuster(a)googlemail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |armin.schuster(a)googlemail.co | |m -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10742 Alexander Nicolaysen Sørnes <alex(a)thehandofagony.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED --- Comment #33 from Alexander Nicolaysen Sørnes <alex(a)thehandofagony.com> 2008-03-31 09:20:13 --- Patch applied. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10742 Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED --- Comment #34 from Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org> 2008-04-04 10:07:06 --- Closing bugs fixed in 0.9.59. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
participants (1)
-
wine-bugs＠winehq.org