[Bug 19055] New: Starfleet Command installer quits with "bad file descriptor" error
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19055 Summary: Starfleet Command installer quits with "bad file descriptor" error Product: Wine Version: 1.1.24 Platform: PC OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: chris(a)chrobis.com When running either of the two executables for game installation for Starfleet Command (Setup.exe or SFCSetup.exe), you get the standard "preparing the InstallShield(R) wizard) progress bar along with the game's splash screen; the fullscreen background for the installer appears and a game sound effect beeps; and then the installer crashes. At the terminal, an error appears: wine client error:1a: write: Bad file descriptor Having run it a few times, the hex number in the error will often change, e.g. wine client error:1c: write: Bad file descriptor But fundamentally, the error remains the same each time. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19055 Anastasius Focht <focht(a)gmx.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |focht(a)gmx.net --- Comment #1 from Anastasius Focht <focht(a)gmx.net> 2009-06-23 16:49:39 --- Hello, reading your symptoms you might have run into the same problem I'm looking at for two days now. Can you run regression test? If its commit f124c7cc38e7edf0823347afa5f8e7126143080d ("ntdll: Simplify the thread startup routine and make it CPU-specific.") we're talking about the same thing. In that case please provide the Linux distribution name/version/arch and the GCC version (gcc -v). It's a (child) thread termination problem which was introduced by AJ's refactoring of i386 thread entry point wrapper. The problem interestingly only manifests when the child thread entry point function (called by wrapper) returns non-zero exit code (passed to pthread_exit). Libgcc's forced unwind heuristics fails on the wrapper stack layout/opcode sequences, causing segfault in unwind phase 2. Regards -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19055 Nikolay Sivov <bunglehead(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bunglehead(a)gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19055 --- Comment #2 from Rico <kgbricola(a)web.de> 2009-06-24 09:40:27 --- Created an attachment (id=21990) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=21990) gcc -v The vcredist_x86.exe triggers the same problem here (coursed by commit f124c7cc38e7edf0823347afa5f8e7126143080d). uname -a: Linux ricola 2.6.29.4-167.fc11.x86_64 #1 SMP Wed May 27 17:27:08 EDT 2009 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19055 Rico <kgbricola(a)web.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #21990|application/octet-stream |text/plain mime type| | -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19055 --- Comment #3 from Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org> 2009-06-24 15:52:41 --- Libgcc can't unwind through Wine code anyway. The reason for separating the function is precisely so that we can add a platform-specific unwind. That crash is very much expected if you are on x86_64. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19055 Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #4 from Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> 2009-06-24 15:54:21 --- I'm seeing this as well on Ubuntu Karmic, with different programs (discovered while running winetrickstest): austin(a)ubuntu:~/winezeug$ gcc -v Using built-in specs. Target: i486-linux-gnu Configured with: ../src/configure -v --with-pkgversion='Ubuntu 4.4.0-6ubuntu2' --with-bugurl=file:///usr/share/doc/gcc-4.4/README.Bugs --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,objc,obj-c++ --prefix=/usr --enable-shared --enable-multiarch --with-system-zlib --libexecdir=/usr/lib --without-included-gettext --enable-threads=posix --with-gxx-include-dir=/usr/include/c++/4.4 --program-suffix=-4.4 --enable-nls --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-mpfr --enable-objc-gc --enable-targets=all --disable-werror --with-arch-32=i486 --with-tune=generic --enable-checking=release --build=i486-linux-gnu --host=i486-linux-gnu --target=i486-linux-gnu Thread model: posix gcc version 4.4.0 (Ubuntu 4.4.0-6ubuntu2) -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19055 --- Comment #5 from Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org> 2009-06-24 16:20:51 --- Created an attachment (id=22004) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=22004) cfi annotations for call_thread_func Does this make any difference? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19055 Marcus Meissner <marcus(a)jet.franken.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |marcus(a)jet.franken.de -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19055 --- Comment #6 from Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> 2009-06-24 17:43:15 --- (In reply to comment #5)
Created an attachment (id=22004) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=22004) [details] cfi annotations for call_thread_func
Does this make any difference?
Works great, thanks! -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19055 --- Comment #7 from Anastasius Focht <focht(a)gmx.net> 2009-06-24 17:47:55 --- Hello, --- quote --- Does this make any difference? --- quote --- yes, the emitted CFI helps libgcc's unwinder, preventing the segfault. I should have looked at gcc -S output of signal_i386.c to see gcc's emitted CFI of other functions ;-) Maybe libgcc's unwinder just relied on the fact if there is any CFI present (call_thread_func: .cfi_startproc and .cfi_endproc) it will be complete CFI. Normally it would be the case if gcc's CFI generator produced the code. The Wine packagers of Distros using gcc 4.4+ for building Wine 1.1.24 should be notified to include your patch. Regards -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19055 --- Comment #7 from Anastasius Focht <focht(a)gmx.net> 2009-06-24 17:47:55 --- Hello, --- quote --- Does this make any difference? --- quote --- yes, the emitted CFI helps libgcc's unwinder, preventing the segfault. I should have looked at gcc -S output of signal_i386.c to see gcc's emitted CFI of other functions ;-) Maybe libgcc's unwinder just relied on the fact if there is any CFI present (call_thread_func: .cfi_startproc and .cfi_endproc) it will be complete CFI. Normally it would be the case if gcc's CFI generator produced the code. The Wine packagers of Distros using gcc 4.4+ for building Wine 1.1.24 should be notified to include your patch. Regards --- Comment #8 from Marcus Meissner <marcus(a)jet.franken.de> 2009-06-25 08:47:27 --- btw, bisecting converged on commit f124c7cc38e7edf0823347afa5f8e7126143080d Author: Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org> Date: Thu Jun 18 16:38:30 2009 +0200 ntdll: Simplify the thread startup routine and make it CPU-specific. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19055 --- Comment #9 from Chris Wales <chris(a)chrobis.com> 2009-06-28 10:41:17 --- Created an attachment (id=22069) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=22069) Output log running Netscape 6.2.2 Log from Netscape 6.2.2 execution showing bug -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19055 Chris Wales <chris(a)chrobis.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Starfleet Command installer |Various apps quit with "bad |quits with "bad file |file descriptor" error |descriptor" error | --- Comment #10 from Chris Wales <chris(a)chrobis.com> 2009-06-28 10:42:58 --- I've also noted this in the installation of Netscape 6.2.2 (freely downloadable) - if you disable activation as described here (http://sillydog.org/netscape/kb/noactivation.html), it quits with the same error. I've attached an output log for reference. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19055 Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED --- Comment #11 from Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org> 2009-07-01 11:55:23 --- Fix is in (for i386, it's still broken on win64). -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19055 Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED --- Comment #12 from Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org> 2009-07-03 12:28:42 --- Closing bugs fixed in 1.1.25. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19055 Anastasius Focht <focht(a)gmx.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed by SHA1| |0c463415432769df5bfe295a071 | |380f3eebe6283 Component|-unknown |ntdll -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
participants (1)
-
wine-bugs＠winehq.org