[Bug 33923] New: Some fonts (usually Chinese fonts) display without bold
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33923 Bug #: 33923 Summary: Some fonts (usually Chinese fonts) display without bold Product: Wine Version: unspecified Platform: x86-64 OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gdi32 AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: kelvin9302104(a)gmail.com Classification: Unclassified I found that some fonts cannot display in bold (but all fonts can display in italic). I have tried using notepad to display bold characters. It can display characters in bold for some fonts, but not for some other fonts (usually Chinese fonts). The situation is the same for both Microsoft Office and notepad. It is probably a general problem in wine. "Hello world" shown in Calibri: http://db.tt/kwhmMxUu "Hello world" shown in Calibri, correctly with bold: http://db.tt/cMSAjNwj "Hello world" shown in JhengHei: http://db.tt/JoTpgpgU "Hello world" shown in JhengHei, correctly with bold: http://db.tt/YW9Y6Yl3 Chinese characters shown in JhengHei: http://db.tt/J5DnJ6O5 Chinese characters shown in JhengHei, *correctly with bold*: http://db.tt/8Wu9bf6M Chinese characters shown in PMingLiU: http://db.tt/Xhj0gd4J Chinese characters shown in PMingLiU, *should have bold but NOT*: http://db.tt/fPFwsVpU "Hello world" shown in PMingLiU: http://db.tt/TAalaCaO "Hello world" shown in PMingLiU, *should have bold but NOT*: http://db.tt/ruXb4ocN I have done some research and found that all fonts cannot display in bold or italic BEFORE, but this feature is implemented now. But why doesn't bold work for some fonts? Is there any solutions? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33923 Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org> 2013-07-01 04:24:58 CDT --- Duplicate. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 7520 *** -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33923 --- Comment #2 from Kelvin Ng <kelvin9302104(a)gmail.com> 2013-07-01 04:36:49 CDT --- I have read bug 7520 before I post this bug but I think they are not duplicate... Bug 7520 is that there are problems for BOTH bold and italic, but this bug is for bold ONLY. Also, the fonts having problems in bug 7520 work perfectly for me. So, they are obviously two bugs. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33923 Kelvin Ng <kelvin9302104(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |UNCONFIRMED Resolution|DUPLICATE | --- Comment #3 from Kelvin Ng <kelvin9302104(a)gmail.com> 2013-07-01 04:55:53 CDT --- Also, it seems that bug 7520 is only for Lotus Notes, but this bug is for every programs in wine. Thus, they are not the same bug. (In reply to comment #1)
Duplicate.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 7520 ***
-- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33923 --- Comment #4 from Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org> 2013-07-01 05:46:50 CDT --- The bug is that gdi doesn't synthesize bold for fonts that don't provide it (italic has been fixed already). It's the same issue. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33923 Kelvin Ng <kelvin9302104(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #5 from Kelvin Ng <kelvin9302104(a)gmail.com> 2013-07-01 07:36:31 CDT --- OK. I'm sorry for that. Is it going to be solved? (In reply to comment #4)
The bug is that gdi doesn't synthesize bold for fonts that don't provide it (italic has been fixed already). It's the same issue.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 7520 *** -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33923 --- Comment #6 from Kelvin Ng <kelvin9302104(a)gmail.com> 2013-07-01 19:24:45 CDT --- Actually, why is this patch rejected: http://source.winehq.org/patches/data/85868? The one who submit bug 12476 have tried this patch and can fix the problem. (In reply to comment #4)
The bug is that gdi doesn't synthesize bold for fonts that don't provide it (italic has been fixed already). It's the same issue.
-- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33923 --- Comment #7 from Bruno Jesus <00cpxxx(a)gmail.com> 2013-07-01 20:03:43 CDT --- (In reply to comment #6)
Actually, why is this patch rejected: http://source.winehq.org/patches/data/85868?
There seemed to be issues with font sizes larger than 32 pixels. http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2012-June/095705.html -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33923 --- Comment #8 from Kelvin Ng <kelvin9302104(a)gmail.com> 2013-07-01 23:56:39 CDT --- I'm trying to apply this patch to wine 1.6-rc4 to see whether that's true or not, but it fails to compile: freetype.c:6516:9: error："bbx" undeclared (first use in this function) bbx += font->potm->otmTextMetrics.tmOverhang; It seems that the patch is outdated for the newest wine. (In reply to comment #7)
(In reply to comment #6)
Actually, why is this patch rejected: http://source.winehq.org/patches/data/85868?
There seemed to be issues with font sizes larger than 32 pixels. http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2012-June/095705.html
-- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33923 Bruno Jesus <00cpxxx(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED --- Comment #9 from Bruno Jesus <00cpxxx(a)gmail.com> 2013-07-05 08:08:52 CDT --- Closing duplicate. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
participants (1)
-
wine-bugs＠winehq.org