[Bug 12730] New: gdi32: some tests fail when X is run in 16 bit mode, but not 32 bit
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12730 Summary: gdi32: some tests fail when X is run in 16 bit mode, but not 32 bit Product: Wine Version: CVS/GIT Platform: PC OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: source, testcase Severity: minor Priority: P2 Component: gdi32 AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: austinenglish(a)gmail.com Created an attachment (id=12382) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=12382) +gdi trace in git +make[2]: *** [bitmap.ok] Error 2 +make[2]: *** [font.ok] Error 2 +make[2]: *** [palette.ok] Error 3 +make[2]: Target `test' not remade because of errors. +make[1]: *** [gdi32/tests/__test__] Error 2 Tried running make -k test with X in 16 bit mode. Surprisingly, all the graphics tests still passed (more likely skipped, didn't check). However, gdi32 is fishy and not skipping, but instead failing. +gdi log attached -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12730 Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|CVS/GIT |0.9.60 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12730 Dan Kegel <dank(a)kegel.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dank(a)kegel.com Keywords| |patch Target Milestone|--- |1.0.0 --- Comment #1 from Dan Kegel <dank(a)kegel.com> 2008-04-25 16:49:49 --- Francois said in http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9916#c66 : As far as I know there are two possible failures for bitmap.c. One is in the black and white tests and can happen in any screen depth. Nothing is known about that failure mode. The other specifically happens when the screen is in 16bpp and the patch below should fix it. The problem is I ran out of time just before submitting it and I haven't had time to pick it up since. http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2007-November/046504.html -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12730 shakaran <shakaran(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |shakaran(a)gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12730 Dan Kegel <dank(a)kegel.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|1.0.0 |1.2.0 --- Comment #2 from Dan Kegel <dank(a)kegel.com> 2008-06-09 10:13:49 --- Deferring, as 16 bit mode isn't all that common anymore, and we're perilously close to releasing 1.0. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12730 --- Comment #3 from Jörg Höhle <hoehle(a)users.sourceforge.net> 2008-06-12 13:53:21 --- Created an attachment (id=13950) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=13950) 16bpp screenshot showing text on opaque white boxes instead of blending in Hi, I've not tried to apply François' patch which sounds interesting. "Meine Traumburg" is a children game which shows white boxes surrounding text output when started in 16bpp (startx -- :1 -depth 16). In 32bpp, the graphics is perfect and there's no visible box. These white boxes are opaque hence shadow the underlying graphics. The screen snapshot shows that when no text is output, the graphics remains visible. Maybe it's related to the testsuite failures? In any case, I promise to test the game again after a future release of wine successfully runs the testsuite in 16bpp X display. Or is there any WINEDEBUG trace you'd like to see right now? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12730 Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords|source |download --- Comment #4 from Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> 2008-12-16 15:27:42 --- +font works fine in git, but bitmap and palette still fail. New +gdi on the way. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12730 Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #12382|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #5 from Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> 2008-12-16 15:29:53 --- Created an attachment (id=17991) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=17991) +gdi, bzip2 -9'ed -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12730 --- Comment #6 from Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> 2008-12-16 15:43:53 --- (In reply to comment #4)
+font works fine in git, but bitmap and palette still fail. New +gdi on the way.
Err, make that the font.ok test works fine now. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12730 --- Comment #7 from Jörg Höhle <hoehle(a)users.sourceforge.net> 2009-03-11 08:18:44 --- Created an attachment (id=19881) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=19881) excerpts from winetest version 1.1.15 logfiles in 16 vs. 32bpp Attached is a summary of differences between running winetest in 32bpp and 16bpp modes on the same machine. Tests from build 8e39646ac4d256b813ff69a23ba0c62ab4f08d33 (wine-1.1.15) Differences are in: - visual.c - 3 different files?! (one per directx dir?) - bitmap.c - GetDIBits; also performs significantly less tests - palette.c - getColor - input.c - msg.c - win.c - GetForegroundWindow o In 16bpp the three visual.c tests are mostly skipped, although the summary doesn't say so: visual.c:1306: Sanity check returned an incorrect color(00000000), can't assure the correctness of the tests, skipping visual: 3 tests executed (0 marked as todo, 0 failures), 0 skipped. (Likewise on http://test.winehq.org, some entries are green because almost no test was performed). In 32bpp, plenty of tests would be executed in visual.c. o Some differences in the number of tests executed are not understandable, as there's no mention of skipping anything nor any difference in the log file, e.g.: sock: 13181 tests executed (5 marked as todo, 0 failures), 0 skipped. vs 32bpp: sock: 13899 tests executed (5 marked as todo, 0 failures), 0 skipped. o Noteworthy are tests where there are more errors (or only errors) in 32bpp: - editor.c:4590: Test failed: test paste: strcmp = 1, text='testing paste Ts' - menu.c:1826: Test failed: test 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16 - msg.c: sequence; testing xyz press/release Finally, msg.c performed more tests and better results in 16bpp! msg: 13057 tests executed (52 marked as todo, 24 failures), 2 skipped. vs. with 16bpp: msg: 14296 tests executed (52 marked as todo, 2 failures), 2 skipped. Perhaps msg.c was written in 16bpp times? In 1.1.15, "Meine Traumburg" still exhibits the 16bpp bug I mentioned in comment #3. (I promised to open a distinct issue should 16bpp tests become as successful as 32bpp while this bug persists) -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12730 --- Comment #8 from Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org> 2009-03-11 08:24:26 --- (In reply to comment #7)
o Some differences in the number of tests executed are not understandable, as there's no mention of skipping anything nor any difference in the log file, e.g.: sock: 13181 tests executed (5 marked as todo, 0 failures), 0 skipped. vs 32bpp: sock: 13899 tests executed (5 marked as todo, 0 failures), 0 skipped.
o Noteworthy are tests where there are more errors (or only errors) in 32bpp: - editor.c:4590: Test failed: test paste: strcmp = 1, text='testing paste Ts' - menu.c:1826: Test failed: test 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16 - msg.c: sequence; testing xyz press/release
Finally, msg.c performed more tests and better results in 16bpp! msg: 13057 tests executed (52 marked as todo, 24 failures), 2 skipped. vs. with 16bpp: msg: 14296 tests executed (52 marked as todo, 2 failures), 2 skipped. Perhaps msg.c was written in 16bpp times?
All of these are race conditions in the tests and have most likely nothing to do with 16/32 bpp. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12730 Scott Ritchie <scott(a)open-vote.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |scott(a)open-vote.org --- Comment #9 from Scott Ritchie <scott(a)open-vote.org> 2009-11-08 03:31:16 --- This bug may already be fixed it seems - could you please retest? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12730 --- Comment #10 from Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> 2009-11-30 23:54:04 --- gdi32/bitmap and gdi32/palette still fail: http://test.winehq.org/data/cb5a2bbb021469b6ebea56d8d3b3078474ab13dd/wine_ae... http://test.winehq.org/data/cb5a2bbb021469b6ebea56d8d3b3078474ab13dd/wine_ae... Additionally, d3d8:visual fails, ddraw:dsurface crashes, opengl32:opengl fails, user32:cursoricon fails, and user32:msg has a todo_fixed (msg.c:4517: Test succeeded inside todo block: ShowWindow(SW_RESTORE):overlapped: marked "todo_wine" but succeeds): http://test.winehq.org/data/cb5a2bbb021469b6ebea56d8d3b3078474ab13dd/wine_ae... -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12730 Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED --- Comment #11 from Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org> 2012-01-23 08:19:55 CST --- This is fixed now. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12730 Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED --- Comment #12 from Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org> 2012-01-27 14:17:56 CST --- Closing bugs fixed in 1.4-rc1. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
participants (1)
-
wine-bugs＠winehq.org