[Bug 35605] New: 3Dmark 2000: Choosing "Run Default Benchmark" says "Benchmark Aborted!"
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35605 Bug ID: 35605 Summary: 3Dmark 2000: Choosing "Run Default Benchmark" says "Benchmark Aborted!" Product: Wine Version: 1.7.12 Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: wylda(a)volny.cz Classification: Unclassified Created attachment 47554 --> http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=47554 Console +relay log from wine-1.7.12-141-gaa22a3c As the title says, one can't run the "Default Benchark" because immediately message box pops-up saying "Benchmark Aborted!". At the attached relay log: 0024:Call user32.MessageBoxA(00010072,0055b274 "Benchmark Aborted!",0055b074 "3DMark Information",00000040) ret=0046ada3 Custom benchmark runs fine, so no problem with 3D enviroment. In case of re-test, be aware, that on the net, there are broken installers, which crash even on WinXP. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35605 Wylda <wylda(a)volny.cz> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |download URL| |http://www.computerbase.de/ | |downloads/software/benchmar | |ks/futuremark_3dmark2000/ --- Comment #1 from Wylda <wylda(a)volny.cz> --- Adding correct URL for download. $ sha1sum -b 3dmark2000v11.exe 7fa48d56464ef3ad03f746dffa851cef276e29ff *3dmark2000v11.exe -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35605 Wylda <wylda(a)volny.cz> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #47554|application/octet-stream |application/x-bzip2 mime type| | -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35605 hanska2(a)luukku.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |hanska2(a)luukku.com --- Comment #2 from hanska2(a)luukku.com --- Interesting. I wanted to try this bug. Starting the demo gives me an error message that 3dmark needs at least 4Mb video memory. So there is definitely something wrong with wine source code. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35605 --- Comment #3 from Wylda <wylda(a)volny.cz> --- Still in wine-1.7.27. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35605 Teras <teras(a)luukku.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |teras(a)luukku.com --- Comment #4 from Teras <teras(a)luukku.com> --- Still not working wine-1.7.37-49-g75a2e85 -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35605 Béla Gyebrószki <gyebro69(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |gyebro69(a)gmail.com --- Comment #5 from Béla Gyebrószki <gyebro69(a)gmail.com> --- For me the default benchmark is aborting when running the application in the traditional full-screen mode, but it runs properly in virtual desktop mode. If someone is up for some regression testing: Wine 1.5.15: the benchmark starts properly in full-screen mode Wine 1.5.20: reports "Benchmark aborted!" Fedora 21 Nvidia binary drivers 340.76 XOrg 1.16.3 XFCE 4.11 3dmark2000v11.exe md5sum: eb025480a0ee5665bddcbda716c67f73 -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35605 Wylda <wylda(a)volny.cz> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |regression CC| |julliard(a)winehq.org Regression SHA1| |a0f039a6049641cc2be8fa32f2a | |fa3c3f394a99b --- Comment #6 from Wylda <wylda(a)volny.cz> --- Many thanks for great tip, GyB. It was broken in version wine-1.5.17-270-ga0f039a: commit a0f039a6049641cc2be8fa32f2afa3c3f394a99b Author: Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org> Date: Thu Nov 22 11:57:15 2012 +0100 user32: Fix the wait event mask in PeekMessage. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35605 Wylda <wylda(a)volny.cz> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|-unknown |user32 Version|1.7.12 |1.5.18 -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35605 --- Comment #7 from Wylda <wylda(a)volny.cz> ---
commit a0f039a6049641cc2be8fa32f2afa3c3f394a99b
FWIW this commit should fix bug 32264. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35605 --- Comment #8 from Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org> --- It looks like it's getting confused by an asynchronous take focus event. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35605 super_man(a)post.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |focht(a)gmx.net, | |super_man(a)post.com --- Comment #9 from super_man(a)post.com --- Works for me 1.8.rc4. Anyone else willing to confirm? -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35605 Anastasius Focht <focht(a)gmx.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #10 from Anastasius Focht <focht(a)gmx.net> --- Hello folks, running 'Default Benchmark' works for me too, resolving 'FIXED'. It would be nice if people with some spare time could add the commit that fixed this by using reverse regression test or just educated guess + cherry pick ;-) You might get results faster by limiting the bisect process to 'user32' since the regression was caused by a change to this module ('git bisect start -- dlls/user32'). Generally speaking this kind of janitorial task is useful and doesn't require a lot of knowledge. --- snip --- -=[ ProtectionID v0.6.6.7 DECEMBER]=- (c) 2003-2015 CDKiLLER & TippeX Build 24/12/14-22:48:13 Ready... Scanning -> Z:\home\focht\Downloads\3dmark2000v11.exe File Type : 32-Bit Exe (Subsystem : Win GUI / 2), Size : 20007579 (01314A9Bh) Byte(s) Compilation TimeStamp : 0x38DFA3F6 -> Mon 27th Mar 2000 18:09:58 (GMT) [TimeStamp] 0x38DFA3F6 -> Mon 27th Mar 2000 18:09:58 (GMT) | PE Header | - | Offset: 0x000000F0 | VA: 0x004000F0 | - -> File has 19843739 (012ECA9Bh) bytes of appended data starting at offset 028000h [File Heuristics] -> Flag #1 : 00000000000000000000000000000100 (0x00000004) [Entrypoint Section Entropy] : 6.59 (section #0) ".text " | Size : 0x105CA (67018) byte(s) [DllCharacteristics] -> Flag : (0x0000) -> NONE [SectionCount] 4 (0x4) | ImageSize 0x2A000 (172032) byte(s) [VersionInfo] Company Name : MadOnion.com [VersionInfo] Product Name : 3DMark2000 [VersionInfo] Product Version : Build 340 [VersionInfo] File Version : Build 340 [VersionInfo] Original FileName : stub32i.exe [VersionInfo] Internal Name : stub32i.exe [VersionInfo] Legal Copyrights : Copyright (c) 1998-2000 MadOnion.com [-= Installer =-] InstallShield v5.53.168.0 Setup Module [CompilerDetect] -> Visual C++ 6.0 - Scan Took : 0.172 Second(s) [0000000ACh (172) tick(s)] [558 of 573 scan(s) done] Scanning -> C:\Program Files\MadOnion.com\3DMark2000\3DMark2000.exe File Type : 32-Bit Exe (Subsystem : Win GUI / 2), Size : 1552384 (017B000h) Byte(s) Compilation TimeStamp : 0x394DCAF4 -> Mon 19th Jun 2000 07:25:40 (GMT) [TimeStamp] 0x394DCAF4 -> Mon 19th Jun 2000 07:25:40 (GMT) | PE Header | - | Offset: 0x00000100 | VA: 0x00400100 | - [File Heuristics] -> Flag #1 : 00000000000000000000000000000000 (0x00000000) [Entrypoint Section Entropy] : 6.54 (section #0) ".text " | Size : 0x11EA8B (1174155) byte(s) [DllCharacteristics] -> Flag : (0x0000) -> NONE [SectionCount] 4 (0x4) | ImageSize 0x183000 (1585152) byte(s) [VersionInfo] Company Name : 6FileDescription [VersionInfo] Product Name : 3DMark Application [VersionInfo] Product Version : 1. 0. 0. 1 [VersionInfo] File Description : 3DMark [VersionInfo] File Version : 1. 0. 0. 1 [VersionInfo] Original FileName : 3DMark2000.exe [VersionInfo] Internal Name : 3DMark [VersionInfo] Legal Trademarks : FOriginalFilename [VersionInfo] Legal Copyrights : Copyright (C) 1998-1999 MadOnion.com [CdKeySerial] found "Registration Key" @ VA: 0x001551D8 / Offset: 0x001551D8 [CompilerDetect] -> Visual C++ 6.0 [!] File appears to have no protection or is using an unknown protection - Scan Took : 0.461 Second(s) [0000001CDh (461) tick(s)] [499 of 573 scan(s) done] --- snip --- $ sha1sum 3dmark2000v11.exe 7fa48d56464ef3ad03f746dffa851cef276e29ff 3dmark2000v11.exe $ du -sh 3dmark2000v11.exe 20M 3dmark2000v11.exe $ wine --version wine-1.8-rc4 Regards -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35605 Wylda <wylda(a)volny.cz> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed by SHA1| |bfb845f9fccb2ff5bff0b0ba323 | |8fec7f9f7b710 --- Comment #11 from Wylda <wylda(a)volny.cz> --- (In reply to Anastasius Focht from comment #10)
It would be nice if people with some spare time could add the commit that fixed this by using reverse regression test...
You're welcome. Fixed by wine-1.7.54-152-gbfb845f: commit bfb845f9fccb2ff5bff0b0ba3238fec7f9f7b710 Author: Sebastian Lackner <sebastian(a)fds-team.de> Date: Thu Nov 5 15:57:29 2015 +0100 dinput: Ensure X11 input events are forwarded to wineserver even without message loop. This commit basically reverts b22ff8018aca7c365e505f1db7732f7050ae259b. Windows does not do that, but our current implementation of winex11 requires periodic event polling to forward events to the wineserver.
You might get results faster by limiting the bisect process to 'user32' since the regression was caused by a change to this module ('git bisect start -- dlls/user32').
I guess, that this wouldn't work this time ;) Thanks Sebastian for fixing this bug! -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35605 Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED --- Comment #12 from Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org> --- Closing bugs fixed in 1.9.0. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
participants (1)
-
wine-bugs＠winehq.org