[Bug 52681] New: Google Chrome Stopped working after 7.2
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52681 Bug ID: 52681 Summary: Google Chrome Stopped working after 7.2 Product: Wine-staging Version: 7.4 Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: critical Priority: P2 Component: -unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: ndk+whq(a)esperanca.biz CC: leslie_alistair(a)hotmail.com, z.figura12(a)gmail.com Distribution: --- Hi! I have been using Google Chrome Portable for some time now. It was working with some options (--no-sandbox) right until wine-staging-7.3. It stopped starting after 7.3. The installation process from portableapps is smooth, it just does not want to start (no 'usual' black screen, just fails starting). I have tried to use old wine directory, new wine directory, installed corefonts as someone suggested in some of the bugs, etc. I also have tried to use wine-staging-7.4 with no luck. After I downgraded back to 7.2 - chrome started working again with --no-sandbox. The system: the latest Gentoo x64. Video card: AMD Radeon 480 (amdgpu Xorg driver). Command: WINEPREFIX=/path/to/wine wine /path/to/chrome --no-sandbox Expected Behavior (works until wine-staging-7.3): Chrome starts and is usable Actual Behavior (wine-staging-7.3; wine-staging-7.4): Chrome fails to start. Let me know if there are any debug info is needed (preferrably which options to enable for WINEDEBUG). -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52681 --- Comment #1 from ndk+whq(a)esperanca.biz --- To add more details: I have tried to use existing Portable Chrome install as well as the most recent one. The behavior is the same. It seems that there was a retrogression between 7.2 and 7.3. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52681 Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- URL| |https://portableapps.com/ap | |ps/internet/google_chrome_p | |ortable Keywords| |download, regression Severity|critical |normal --- Comment #2 from Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> --- It would be helpful if you could run a regression test, see: https://wiki.winehq.org/Regression_Testing https://wiki.winehq.org/Wine-Staging#Regressions_between_Staging_versions -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52681 Fabian Maurer <dark.shadow4(a)web.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dark.shadow4(a)web.de --- Comment #3 from Fabian Maurer <dark.shadow4(a)web.de> --- Just tested "GoogleChromePortable_99.0.4844.74_online.paf.exe". Starts fine with wine-staging-7.4 and wine-7.4, both using "--no-sandbox". -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52681 --- Comment #4 from ndk+whq(a)esperanca.biz --- The bug still exists in wine-staging-7.10. I finally had some time to do regression testing. I ran git bisect on the repository. I found out the commit at which chrome stops working: https://gitlab.winehq.org/wine/wine/-/commit/7b233f3032e4850b0f387faef4aae5e... After git bisect, I did manually checked out the previous commit - it worked. Then checked out the commit above - chrome stops working. Hopefully, it helps. Let me know if any additional information is required. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52681 --- Comment #5 from ndk+whq(a)esperanca.biz --- To add more details: I ran git bisect on versions between wine-7.2 and wine-7.3. I checked out wine from the wine repo: https://source.winehq.org/git/wine.git I also changed the video card meanwhile (now I have 3070 Ti), so video drivers aren't likely to have any influence. My system is AMD Ryzen 5900x. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52681 ndk+whq(a)esperanca.biz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Distribution|--- |Gentoo Version|7.4 |7.3 Regression SHA1| |7b233f3032e4850b0f387faef4a | |ae5ed6d5175de -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52681 Alistair Leslie-Hughes <leslie_alistair(a)hotmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Wine-staging |Wine CC|leslie_alistair(a)hotmail.com | Component|-unknown |-unknown --- Comment #6 from Alistair Leslie-Hughes <leslie_alistair(a)hotmail.com> --- Based off Regression commit, moving to wine -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52681 --- Comment #7 from Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org> --- It starts fine here with GoogleChromePortable_103.0.5060.134_Repack_online.paf.exe. Could you please get a WINEDEBUG=module log? -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52681 --- Comment #8 from ndk+whq(a)esperanca.biz --- Created attachment 72824 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=72824 Wine-staging 7.10 log This is the log for wine-staging 7.10 -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52681 --- Comment #9 from ndk+whq(a)esperanca.biz --- Log added. I used latest wine installed (wine-staging-7.10) to make a log. Let me know if you need that a log for that specific commit. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52681 Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Regression SHA1|7b233f3032e4850b0f387faef4a | |ae5ed6d5175de | --- Comment #10 from Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org> --- Thanks for the log! It looks like it's assuming that system dlls are loaded at the same address in all processes. The referenced commit is not the real cause of the problem, it's a side effect of the address space layout being different because we are no longer loading all the api-* dlls. It works fine with Mingw builds, so you should install mingw-w64 and rebuild. For non-Mingw builds it's probably a WONTFIX. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52681 --- Comment #11 from ndk+whq(a)esperanca.biz --- I can confirm that after recompiling on Gentoo with 'mingw' flag it started working. Thank you! -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52681 --- Comment #12 from ndk+whq(a)esperanca.biz --- I do have a question though. If there are fundamental issues with non mingw builds, should it be a hard prerequisite for compiling wine? It seems like it's still an optional dependency. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52681 --- Comment #13 from Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org> --- It may become a requirement at some point, yes. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52681 Alan <alan1010035(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |alan1010035(a)gmail.com --- Comment #14 from Alan <alan1010035(a)gmail.com> --- please consider closing if issue is fixed -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52681 Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Google Chrome Stopped |Google Chrome Stopped |working after 7.2 |working after 7.2 in non-PE | |build -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52681 Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED --- Comment #15 from Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org> --- Marking as WONTFIX for the non-PE build case, since the PE build works fine. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52681 Gijs Vermeulen <gijsvrm(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED --- Comment #16 from Gijs Vermeulen <gijsvrm(a)gmail.com> --- Closing WONTFIX. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
participants (1)
-
WineHQ Bugzilla