[Bug 52857] New: msvcp140:msvcp140 fails in Windows 8.1 on the cw-rx460 machine
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52857 Bug ID: 52857 Summary: msvcp140:msvcp140 fails in Windows 8.1 on the cw-rx460 machine Product: Wine Version: unspecified Hardware: x86-64 OS: Windows Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: msvcp Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: fgouget(a)codeweavers.com msvcp140:msvcp140 fails in Windows 8.1 on the cw-rx460 machine msvcp140.c:1617: Test failed: Got unexpected err 87. msvcp140.c:1622: Test failed: Got unexpected err 87. https://test.winehq.org/data/patterns.html#msvcp140:msvcp140 These are new tests so unsurprisingly the failures are caused by the commit that introduced them: commit d72d596070eb28fd5f747fb6120d36f66ff93bec Author: Paul Gofman <pgofman(a)codeweavers.com> Date: Mon Apr 11 21:44:35 2022 +0300 msvcp140: Implement _Copy_file(). Signed-off-by: Paul Gofman <pgofman(a)codeweavers.com> Signed-off-by: Piotr Caban <piotr(a)codeweavers.com> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org> The fact that only this specific Windows 8.1 configuration fails makes sense because it is the only one to have msvcp140 and it is a relatively old version: it is installed by the Radeon driver. However: * The w7u VM does have (a much newer) msvcp140 and has no failure. * The w1064v1607 VM has the same msvcp140 version and has no failure either. Furthermore kernel32:file also fails in the same way in the same configuration and shouldn't depend on msvcp140. So it's possible the issue is not related to msvcp140 at all. Here is a summary of the msvcp140 versions on the Windows 7, 8.1 and older Windows 10 machines: Win Machine msvcp140 win7 w7u 14.29.30037.0 win7 w7pro64 missing (at least for 64-bit) win81 cw-gtx560 missing win81 cw-rx460 14.0.23026.0 win81 w8 missing win81 w864 missing win1507 cw-gtx560 missing win1507 cw-rx460 missing win1507 w1064v1507 missing win1607 w1064v1607 14.0.23026.0 -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52857 François Gouget <fgouget(a)codeweavers.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Regression SHA1| |d72d596070eb28fd5f747fb6120 | |d36f66ff93bec Keywords| |regression, source, | |testcase --- Comment #1 from François Gouget <fgouget(a)codeweavers.com> --- See bug 52858 for the corresponding kernel32:file failure. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52857 François Gouget <fgouget(a)codeweavers.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed by SHA1| |ae48b2c9ee70df5b8cd765ab288 | |45aa2581c8149 Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #2 from François Gouget <fgouget(a)codeweavers.com> --- This is essentially a duplicate of a kernel32:file failure because the test exercises the same underlying API: CopyFileW(). This failure happened on the Windows 8.1 cw-rx460 because it happened to have a newer kernel32 dll (see bug 52858 for the details). The test has been updated to ignore this CopyFileW() quirk so that this bug is now fixed. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52857 Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED --- Comment #3 from Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org> --- Closing bugs fixed in 7.8. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
participants (1)
-
WineHQ Bugzilla