[Bug 39265] New: winhttp may try to decrypt one more ssl message than needed
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39265 Bug ID: 39265 Summary: winhttp may try to decrypt one more ssl message than needed Product: Wine Version: unspecified Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: winhttp Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: 7element(a)mail.bg Distribution: --- In net.c:642 in read_ssl_chunk there is no break if buf_len == ssl_buf_size. If buf_len actually becomes equal to ssl_buf_size after buf_len += size, the loop should break, otherwise a new ssl message will be tried to be read. Code needs something like this on line 643: if(buf_len == ssl_buf_size) break; -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39265 Sebastian Lackner <sebastian(a)fds-team.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sebastian(a)fds-team.de --- Comment #1 from Sebastian Lackner <sebastian(a)fds-team.de> --- This is basically the same situation as in https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39264, is there a reason why this needs to be tracked as separate bug? -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39265 --- Comment #2 from 7element(a)mail.bg --- Not really. This is the first time I submit bugs and I thought there should be two bugs, because they are in separate modules. You can close it if this will be tracked together with the other. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39265 Sebastian Lackner <sebastian(a)fds-team.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE --- Comment #3 from Sebastian Lackner <sebastian(a)fds-team.de> --- Marking as duplicate, since the situation for both wininet/winhttp is basically identical. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 39264 *** -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39265 Ken Sharp <imwellcushtymelike(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED --- Comment #4 from Ken Sharp <imwellcushtymelike(a)gmail.com> --- Closing -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39265 Anastasius Focht <focht(a)gmx.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |focht(a)gmx.net Version|unspecified |1.7.51 -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
participants (1)
-
wine-bugs＠winehq.org