[Bug 40273] New: Call from 0x7b83d9b2 to unimplemented function windowscodecs.dll.WICCreateBitmapFromSection
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40273 Bug ID: 40273 Summary: Call from 0x7b83d9b2 to unimplemented function windowscodecs.dll.WICCreateBitmapFromSection Product: Wine Version: 1.9.5 Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: windowscodecs Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: xerox_xerox2000(a)yahoo.co.uk Distribution: --- a user reported problems with this app https://paprikaapp.com/windows/ on the forum. After winetricks dotnet45 corefonts and working around https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15670 by adding registrykey like wine-staging does** the app crashes with Call from 0x7b83d9b2 to unimplemented function windowscodecs.dll.WICCreateBitmapFromSection When i use native windowscodecs it also crashes with: Unhandled Exception: System.NotSupportedException: No imaging component suitable to complete this operation was found. ---> System.Runtime.InteropServices.COMException: Exception from HRESULT: 0x88982F50 **: (see https://github.com/wine-compholio/wine-staging/blob/master/patches/wine.inf-...) -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40273 Louis Lenders <xerox_xerox2000(a)yahoo.co.uk> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |download URL| |https://paprikaapp.com/wind | |ows/ -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40273 --- Comment #1 from Dmitry Timoshkov <dmitry(a)baikal.ru> --- Created attachment 53916 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=53916 patch Does this patch help? -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40273 --- Comment #2 from Louis Lenders <xerox_xerox2000(a)yahoo.co.uk> --- (In reply to Dmitry Timoshkov from comment #1)
Created attachment 53916 [details] patch
Does this patch help?
Hi Dmitry, the patch fixes the crash and the application starts fine now. Thanks for this very quick fix Dmitry! -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40273 --- Comment #3 from Hans Leidekker <hans(a)meelstraat.net> --- (In reply to Dmitry Timoshkov from comment #1)
Created attachment 53916 [details] patch
Does this patch help?
I recently worked on an application that needs WICCreateBitmapFromSection and tried the same approach, but it didn't work. The app embeds chromium which renders a web page to a section and keeps updating the section. Another thread periodically reads from the bitmap object and displays it on the screen. So instead creating a copy of the section data we should store the view and use that for reads and writes. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40273 --- Comment #4 from Dmitry Timoshkov <dmitry(a)baikal.ru> --- Created attachment 53921 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=53921 patch v2 Something like the attached patch should take care of the modifications to the section data made by an application. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40273 --- Comment #5 from Hans Leidekker <hans(a)meelstraat.net> --- (In reply to Dmitry Timoshkov from comment #4)
Created attachment 53921 [details] patch v2
Something like the attached patch should take care of the modifications to the section data made by an application.
Yep. I'm not sure you can pass the offset straight into MapViewOfFile. The documentation for MapViewOfFile says it should be a multiple of the allocation granularity but no such restriction is mentioned for WICCreateBitmapFromSection. An alternative would be to map the view at the base and store it separately. The data pointer would then point at the offset into the view. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40273 --- Comment #6 from Dmitry Timoshkov <dmitry(a)baikal.ru> --- (In reply to Hans Leidekker from comment #5)
Yep. I'm not sure you can pass the offset straight into MapViewOfFile. The documentation for MapViewOfFile says it should be a multiple of the allocation granularity but no such restriction is mentioned for WICCreateBitmapFromSection.
An alternative would be to map the view at the base and store it separately. The data pointer would then point at the offset into the view.
Of course this would need some tests to figure out how it's supposed to behave in such cases, and if passing a not page aligned offset should work. Also it would be interesting to test what happens when a read-only section is passed, and somebody attempts to write to a bitmap using WIC APIs. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40273 Sebastian Lackner <sebastian(a)fds-team.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |STAGED CC| |dmitry(a)baikal.ru, | |erich.e.hoover(a)wine-staging | |.com, michael(a)fds-team.de, | |sebastian(a)fds-team.de Staged patchset| |https://github.com/wine-com | |pholio/wine-staging/tree/ma | |ster/patches/windowscodecs- | |WICCreateBitmapFromSection -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40273 Robert Walker <bob.mt.wya(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bob.mt.wya(a)gmail.com --- Comment #7 from Robert Walker <bob.mt.wya(a)gmail.com> --- Created attachment 53992 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=53992 Paprika Recipe Manager console output Console log and backtrace from Paprika Recipe Manager running on Wine Staging (git commit: 8d7c66f500718f2e52816e77f8d685f891f9cc0c). Still appears to fail as before... Or perhaps I've done something else wrong :-) -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40273 Bruno Jesus <00cpxxx(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Call from 0x7b83d9b2 to |Paprika Recipe Manager |unimplemented function |needs |windowscodecs.dll.WICCreate |windowscodecs.dll.WICCreate |BitmapFromSection |BitmapFromSection -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40273 Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |patch -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40273 Andy P <pembertona(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pembertona(a)gmail.com --- Comment #8 from Andy P <pembertona(a)gmail.com> --- Dmitry: any chance to get this patch packaged into an official Wine release? I see the status marked as STAGED but not sure what that means. I had the same issue (with a different app, not Paprika) and patch_v2 did indeed fix it so hoping to get it released! -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40273 --- Comment #9 from Andy P <pembertona(a)gmail.com> --- Just confirming I think I learned this patch is available in 2.21-staging but not 2.22-devel or any of the 3.x branches. Any chance to move this forward to 3.x? -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40273 Dmitry Timoshkov <dmitry(a)baikal.ru> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed by SHA1| |1184f9d969c247b455df34d4955 | |f3b8789cb5afa Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|STAGED |RESOLVED --- Comment #10 from Dmitry Timoshkov <dmitry(a)baikal.ru> --- Committed as 1184f9d969c247b455df34d4955f3b8789cb5afa. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40273 --- Comment #11 from Andy P <pembertona(a)gmail.com> --- Dmitry: thanks! Confirming this patch did not make 3.4-devel? If that's right, any idea when 3.5 may be available? -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40273 --- Comment #12 from Dmitry Timoshkov <dmitry(a)baikal.ru> --- (In reply to Andy P from comment #11)
Dmitry: thanks! Confirming this patch did not make 3.4-devel?
That's correct.
If that's right, any idea when 3.5 may be available?
wine-3.5 should be released next friday. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40273 Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED --- Comment #13 from Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org> --- Closing bugs fixed in 3.5. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40273 Michael Stefaniuc <mstefani(a)winehq.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|--- |3.0.x -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40273 Michael Stefaniuc <mstefani(a)winehq.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|3.0.x |--- --- Comment #14 from Michael Stefaniuc <mstefani(a)winehq.org> --- Drop 3.0.x tag for bug fixes that won't make it into wine-3.0.x. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
participants (1)
-
wine-bugs＠winehq.org