[Bug 36092] New: unimplemented function CreateSortedAddressPairs
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36092 Bug ID: 36092 Summary: unimplemented function CreateSortedAddressPairs Product: Wine Version: 1.7.17 Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: critical Priority: P2 Component: iphlpapi Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: matyapiro31(a)gmail.com This function call is used in MS Office web installer(2013),and this cause crush. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36092 Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|critical |normal --- Comment #1 from Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> --- Not critical. Please attach terminal output. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36092 --- Comment #2 from Akira Nakagawa <matyapiro31(a)gmail.com> --- Created attachment 48282 --> http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=48282 log file. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36092 Anastasius Focht <focht(a)gmx.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |focht(a)gmx.net Summary|unimplemented function |Microsoft Office 2013 |CreateSortedAddressPairs |(15.0) web installer | |crashes on unimplemented | |function | |IPHLPAPI.DLL.CreateSortedAd | |dressPairs -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36092 Bruno Jesus <00cpxxx(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |00cpxxx(a)gmail.com --- Comment #3 from Bruno Jesus <00cpxxx(a)gmail.com> --- Created attachment 48311 --> http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=48311 hack Please try the attached hack, I'm mostly interested in the parameters printed in the log, the implementation is just a shoot in the dark since I could not find any example of the function use. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36092 --- Comment #4 from Akira Nakagawa <matyapiro31(a)gmail.com> --- Hello.Bruno. Thank you for your patch,but I expect that you need to define struct types used in functions. See MSDN page. http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/ms740496(v=vs.85).as... -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36092 --- Comment #5 from Bruno Jesus <00cpxxx(a)gmail.com> --- Actually the patch compiles and make test runs in Windows 8. Are you getting any errors? -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36092 --- Comment #6 from Bruno Jesus <00cpxxx(a)gmail.com> --- I see that inetmib1 dll will not compile with the patch but please try iphlpapi only. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36092 --- Comment #7 from Akira Nakagawa <matyapiro31(a)gmail.com> --- Sorry,I cannnot compile,them at once. So I want you to fix this bug. I think they have more unimplemented functions, and I have another work. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36092 --- Comment #8 from Akira Nakagawa <matyapiro31(a)gmail.com> --- I used make -k to force compiling. Please wait for my testing... -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36092 --- Comment #9 from Akira Nakagawa <matyapiro31(a)gmail.com> --- I cannot compile this time,either. Please re-create the patch file. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36092 Bruno Jesus <00cpxxx(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #48311|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #10 from Bruno Jesus <00cpxxx(a)gmail.com> --- Created attachment 48477 --> http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=48477 hack2 This patch will not affect other dlls. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36092 --- Comment #11 from Akira Nakagawa <matyapiro31(a)gmail.com> --- Created attachment 48555 --> http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=48555 message log of execution. I'm sure that to escape from calling this function by "fixme" is not effective. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36092 Bruno Jesus <00cpxxx(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #48282|0 |1 is obsolete| | Attachment #48477|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #12 from Bruno Jesus <00cpxxx(a)gmail.com> --- Created attachment 48566 --> http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=48566 hack3 Please try again with this newer patch. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36092 --- Comment #13 from Akira Nakagawa <matyapiro31(a)gmail.com> --- This patch is not acceptable. NO .spec file changed. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36092 --- Comment #14 from Bruno Jesus <00cpxxx(a)gmail.com> --- (In reply to Akira Nakagawa from comment #13)
This patch is not acceptable. NO .spec file changed.
You are right, I forgot to add it. Please take the spec change from the previous patch from comment 10. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36092 Akira Nakagawa <matyapiro31(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|1.7.17 |1.7.19 -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36092 --- Comment #15 from Akira Nakagawa <matyapiro31(a)gmail.com> --- Let's close this bug when hack3(+spec file diff) is accepted, and post a new one "the function is stub". -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36092 Akira Nakagawa <matyapiro31(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #48555|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #16 from Akira Nakagawa <matyapiro31(a)gmail.com> --- Created attachment 48578 --> http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=48578 This file is a log of the executiion after applied patch of hack3.txt This file says,an error has happened when this is not implemented correctly. To run MS Office 2013,to fix this bug is recommended. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36092 --- Comment #17 from Bruno Jesus <00cpxxx(a)gmail.com> --- I have no idea how the function works, actually it looks like no one in the internet has any idea because I can't find a single example about it. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36092 --- Comment #18 from Akira Nakagawa <matyapiro31(a)gmail.com> --- Most not_implemented_yet functions and methods are not used without runtimes or closed codes. I think the firstest way is to gather wine terminal logs (We need expert of GNU R,don't we?)and analyze it. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36092 Brandon Corujo <haku08879(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |haku08879(a)gmail.com -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36092 Simon <swdevelop1981(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |swdevelop1981(a)gmail.com -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36092 Derek Atkins <warlord(a)mit.edu> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |warlord(a)mit.edu --- Comment #19 from Derek Atkins <warlord(a)mit.edu> --- I'm hitting this issue too. I applied hack3 to 1.7.20 (in FC20) and the popup about this mssing API went away and now of get a page fault instead. (I'll attach the full console log) FYI, documentation for this function is at http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/bb870773%28v=vs.85%2... although I suspect that still might not help you implement the function. This issue is preventing me from installing Word under Wine. :( -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36092 --- Comment #20 from Derek Atkins <warlord(a)mit.edu> --- Created attachment 49006 --> http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=49006 Console after applying patch -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36092 --- Comment #21 from Derek Atkins <warlord(a)mit.edu> --- Bruno, I'm looking more closely at your patch and either I'm confused or there's a bug. In particular, the SOCKADDR_IN6_PAIR is defined to be a structure of two PSOCKADDR_IN6 members, i.e., two pointers to SOCKADDR_IN6. You allocate the returned structure via: retaddr=HeapAlloc(GetProcessHeap(),0,sizeof(SOCKADDR_IN6_PAIR)*destinationcount); Which unless I'm confused will allocate the array of PAIR objects, but wont deep-allocate the SOCKADDR_IN6 pointers in each object. Assuming I'm correct that HeapAlloc() works like a Unix "malloc" then your bug is on the next line in the loop, where you memset into the (non-allocated) object: memset(retaddr[i].SourceAddress,0,sizeof(SOCKADDR_IN6)); At this point retaddr[i].SourceAddress should, unless I'm confused, be a NULL pointer (or garbage).. I don't see where you ever allocate the pointer? For example I just added some code to your patch to output the Source and Dest address pointers and indeed they are garbage: fixme:iphlpapi:CreateSortedAddressPairs source (nil), sourcecount 0, destination 0x511ba8, destcount 15, sortoptions 0, sortedaddr 0x32e684, sortedcount 0x32e66c fixme:iphlpapi:CreateSortedAddressPairs SourceAddress: 0x110118, DestAddress: 0x110108 fixme:iphlpapi:CreateSortedAddressPairs SourceAddress: 0x1, DestAddress: 0x6 wine: Unhandled page fault on write access to 0x00000001 at address 0x7e69bdff (thread 0009), starting debugger... err:seh:raise_exception Unhandled exception code c0000005 flags 0 addr 0x7bc50e20 -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36092 --- Comment #22 from Derek Atkins <warlord(a)mit.edu> --- Created attachment 49009 --> http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=49009 Updated patch to implement CreateSortedAddressPairs -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36092 Derek Atkins <warlord(a)mit.edu> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #49006|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #23 from Derek Atkins <warlord(a)mit.edu> --- Created attachment 49010 --> http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=49010 Updated console log -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36092 Bruno Jesus <00cpxxx(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #24 from Bruno Jesus <00cpxxx(a)gmail.com> --- Hi, it looks like you attached the wrong files in your 2 previous messages. The problem with this function is that is so new that nobody uses it yet beyond Microsoft. Withtout an example of what it is supposed to do it's hard to fix. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36092 Derek Atkins <warlord(a)mit.edu> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #49009|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #25 from Derek Atkins <warlord(a)mit.edu> --- Created attachment 49012 --> http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=49012 Patch that seems to fix the issue Sorry, here's the patch. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36092 Derek Atkins <warlord(a)mit.edu> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #49012|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #26 from Derek Atkins <warlord(a)mit.edu> --- Created attachment 49013 --> http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=49013 Console that shows the continuation and hang Here's the console log after applying my last patch.. The installer hangs at this point with no pop ups at all. This is with Wine configured as Win7, 32-bit. If I set it up as Vista or XP it does pop up a dialog saying that the version of windows is too old. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36092 Derek Atkins <warlord(a)mit.edu> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #49012|1 |0 is obsolete| | -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36092 Derek Atkins <warlord(a)mit.edu> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #49010|0 |1 is obsolete| | -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36092 --- Comment #27 from Bruno Jesus <00cpxxx(a)gmail.com> --- Please attach a +winsock,+iphlpapi log with your patch applied. The next step is to try to prove the patch is right by creating a test to it inside iphlpapi/tests. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36092 --- Comment #28 from Derek Atkins <warlord(a)mit.edu> --- Created attachment 49014 --> http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=49014 Console log with +winsock,+iphlpapi Okay, here is the console log as requested. Same thing happened as last time, it hung. I hit Ctrl-C here (which doesn't show up in the console log): fixme:win:RegisterPowerSettingNotification (0x10040,{3c0f4548-c03f-4c4d-b9f2-237ede686376},0): stub ^Ctrace:winsock:DllMain 0x7e4e0000 0x2 (nil) -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36092 --- Comment #29 from Bruno Jesus <00cpxxx(a)gmail.com> --- The log gives a few hints, you can see 12 calls to getaddrinfo and then a call to CreateSortedAddressPairs with count = 12. Unfortunately there are no connect calls. The installer may or may not have liked the returned results, or the problem is now somewhere else. If you return ERROR_NOT_SUPPORTED in CreateSortedAddressPairs do you get the same output? -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36092 --- Comment #30 from Derek Atkins <warlord(a)mit.edu> --- Created attachment 49015 --> http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=49015 Console log with ERROR_NOT_SUPPORTED Looks pretty much the same when I return ERROR_NOT_SUPPORTED. :( -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36092 --- Comment #31 from Akira Nakagawa <matyapiro31(a)gmail.com> --- What is it,winsock:DllMain 0x7e4f0000 0x3 (nil)? This seems unimplemented is called. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36092 --- Comment #32 from Akira Nakagawa <matyapiro31(a)gmail.com> --- What is it,winsock:DllMain 0x7e4f0000 0x3 (nil)? This seems unimplemented is called. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36092 --- Comment #33 from Bruno Jesus <00cpxxx(a)gmail.com> --- (In reply to Akira Nakagawa from comment #32)
What is it,winsock:DllMain 0x7e4f0000 0x3 (nil)? This seems unimplemented is called.
It's always displayed when the dll is loaded, nothing wrong with it. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36092 --- Comment #34 from Derek Atkins <warlord(a)mit.edu> --- FWIW, I just upgraded to 1.7.22, applied my same patch (from comment 25), and still have the same result of the installer hanging. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36092 Bruno Jesus <00cpxxx(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jgrivera67(a)gmail.com --- Comment #35 from Bruno Jesus <00cpxxx(a)gmail.com> --- *** Bug 37057 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36092 Michael Hampton <error(a)ioerror.us> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |error(a)ioerror.us --- Comment #36 from Michael Hampton <error(a)ioerror.us> --- This function really isn't new, it's been in Windows since Vista. It is an IPv6 function, which is why almost nobody has used it until now. This appears to be Microsoft's dramatically over-engineered attempt to comply with RFC 3484. This MSDN article (different from the one linked earlier!) explains how it's intended to be used. http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/ms740614%28v=vs.85%2... By comparison getaddrinfo() accomplishes the task much more easily and does a lot more. I think it could be used to implement CreateSortedAddressPairs, though there is probably a "better" way to do it. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36092 Nikolay Sivov <bunglehead(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tm12333(a)hotmail.com --- Comment #37 from Nikolay Sivov <bunglehead(a)gmail.com> --- *** Bug 37649 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36092 Sebastian Lackner <sebastian(a)fds-team.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sebastian(a)fds-team.de -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36092 --- Comment #38 from Akira Nakagawa <matyapiro31(a)gmail.com> --- this function is only ping and sort ip address by record. Does someone try this? You can refer this script. http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-core-dev/software-properties/main/view/h... -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36092 Bruno Jesus <00cpxxx(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |download URL| |http://www.onenote.com/down | |load Summary|Microsoft Office 2013 |Microsoft Office 2013 |(15.0) web installer |(15.0) and OneNote web |crashes on unimplemented |installer crashes on |function |unimplemented function |IPHLPAPI.DLL.CreateSortedAd |IPHLPAPI.DLL.CreateSortedAd |dressPairs |dressPairs --- Comment #39 from Bruno Jesus <00cpxxx(a)gmail.com> --- Now there is a program that is freely available and can be used to reproduce the issue, the chances of getting the bug fixed are a little higher. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36092 Bruno Jesus <00cpxxx(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #48566|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #40 from Bruno Jesus <00cpxxx(a)gmail.com> --- Created attachment 50283 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=50283 hack 4 This is my current attempt, actually it's much easier to simply return ERROR_NOT_SUPPORTED which tells the application that IPv6 is not available... But at least here for OneNote that does not work. Can anyone give it a try? -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36092 Alex <asimon880(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |asimon880(a)gmail.com --- Comment #41 from Alex <asimon880(a)gmail.com> --- so whats the progress on getting this to work? looks like some exciting stuff going on. my wife won't switch to linux until office 2013 can run on linux -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36092 --- Comment #42 from Akira Nakagawa <matyapiro31(a)gmail.com> --- So,I'm not sure what's a problem. I think this function call ping,but Wine doesn't have it. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36092 --- Comment #43 from Derek Atkins <warlord(a)mit.edu> --- Even when you make this function work (as I did in my proposed patch in July), there are more problems with Office-2013. Fixing this API is necessary, but not sufficient, to get Office-2013 working. However will all the proposed patches so far I don't understand why *this* issue is still open. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36092 --- Comment #44 from Nikolay Sivov <bunglehead(a)gmail.com> --- (In reply to Derek Atkins from comment #43)
Even when you make this function work (as I did in my proposed patch in July), there are more problems with Office-2013. Fixing this API is necessary, but not sufficient, to get Office-2013 working.
True.
However will all the proposed patches so far I don't understand why *this* issue is still open.
It will be fixed eventually, don't worry. You already named one of the reasons why it's not already fixed - it's not a real blocker for Office 2013. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36092 --- Comment #45 from Derek Atkins <warlord(a)mit.edu> ---
It will be fixed eventually, don't worry. You already named one of the reasons > why it's not already fixed - it's not a real blocker for Office 2013.
I disagree. It *IS* a real blocker for Office 2013. It's just not the *only* blocker. That's what is meant by "necessary but not sufficient." Office13 will never install without this issue being fixed. However there are more issues that will also need to be fixed to get Office13 to install even after this issue is fixed. But getting to those issues requires fixing this one first, because you don't HIT those issues while this issue still exists. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36092 --- Comment #46 from Nikolay Sivov <bunglehead(a)gmail.com> --- (In reply to Derek Atkins from comment #45)
It *IS* a real blocker for Office 2013.
Not really, simple stub works just fine.
However there are more issues that will also need to be fixed to get Office13 to install even after this issue is fixed.
What's a next problem with an installer? Feel free to report it, no need to wait for this one to get resolved.
But getting to those issues requires fixing this one first, because you don't HIT those issues while this issue still exists.
-- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36092 --- Comment #47 from Akira Nakagawa <matyapiro31(a)gmail.com> --- Is there a way to avoid this bug? I don't know the patch sent by Derek Atkins. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36092 --- Comment #48 from Derek Atkins <warlord(a)mit.edu> --- (In reply to Nikolay Sivov from comment #46)
(In reply to Derek Atkins from comment #45)
It *IS* a real blocker for Office 2013.
Not really, simple stub works just fine.
I honestly don't recall if a simple stub worked or not. Last I played with this was back in July when I came up with my proposed patch. I needed to get work done so I just installed Office2013 into a Win7 VM.
What's a next problem with an installer? Feel free to report it, no need to wait for this one to get resolved.
Again, I don't recall at this time, and I don't have my changes in place anymore. I do recall that seeing the next issue required getting past this one. Akira: See my attachment at the top of this bug report from July 14, entitled "Patch that seems to fix the issue" -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36092 --- Comment #49 from Akira Nakagawa <matyapiro31(a)gmail.com> --- Created attachment 50346 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=50346 CreateSortedAddressPairs implemention(for test) Add testing patch. (Icmp6SendEcho2 is needed.) This is my trying. I cannot test CreateSortedAddressPairs itself,becaouse I'm not good at Win32. I want someone to create test of it. this patch should be adapted after hack4,and if FreeMibTable is created originally, you should remove it from source. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36092 --- Comment #50 from Alex <asimon880(a)gmail.com> --- im not that great in programming but what kind of stuff can i do to help? -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36092 --- Comment #51 from Akira Nakagawa <matyapiro31(a)gmail.com> --- Donate me and CodeWeavers. This problem needs time to fix,but we cannot earn from this. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36092 --- Comment #52 from Bruno Jesus <00cpxxx(a)gmail.com> --- Returning the not supported error in this function is enough, it will fallback to IPv4 connectivity. There are other problems blocking the installer to run which are still unknown. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36092 Akira Nakagawa <matyapiro31(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #53 from Akira Nakagawa <matyapiro31(a)gmail.com> --- Donate me and CodeWeavers. This problem needs time to fix,but we cannot earn from this. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36092 Nikolay Sivov <bunglehead(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|FIXED |--- --- Comment #54 from Nikolay Sivov <bunglehead(a)gmail.com> --- (In reply to Akira Nakagawa from comment #53)
Donate me and CodeWeavers. This problem needs time to fix,but we cannot earn from this.
Please leave it open. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36092 Bruno Jesus <00cpxxx(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed by SHA1| |6b4dcb3f35c4e406463e5139d10 | |5f20468a21e44 Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #55 from Bruno Jesus <00cpxxx(a)gmail.com> --- This bug main subject is now fixed by http://source.winehq.org/git/wine.git/commitdiff/6b4dcb3f35c4e406463e5139d10... The real implementation of this function deserves its own bug. It looks like the installer goes further when dotnet45 is installed, at least I get a message box saying a problem was found. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36092 Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED --- Comment #56 from Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org> --- Closing bugs fixed in 1.7.34. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36092 --- Comment #57 from Akira Nakagawa <matyapiro31(a)gmail.com> --- I will post a new bug after testing 1.7.34. Even if it is installed successfully, Probably they are never run because of dotnet4.5 missing. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36092 --- Comment #58 from Anastasius Focht <focht(a)gmx.net> --- Hello folks just to avoid creation of dupes ... --- quote --- I will post a new bug after testing 1.7.34. Even if it is installed successfully, Probably they are never run because of dotnet4.5 missing. --- quote --- Microsoft states requirements here: http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee624351%28v=office.15%29.aspx ("System requirements for Office 2013") --- quote --- .NET version 3.5, 4.0, or 4.5 --- quote --- I did a full install in a clean 32-bit WINEPREFIX without Wine-Mono or any MS .NET Frameworks present at all without any problems. The blocker for running the Office 2013 apps is the usage of Direct2D/DirectWrite and DirectX10 API. There is also a configuration/setup completion loop present on startup (likely security related). Regards -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
participants (1)
-
wine-bugs＠winehq.org