[Bug 49484] New: test_query_process_image_info() test is broken on a not PE build
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49484 Bug ID: 49484 Summary: test_query_process_image_info() test is broken on a not PE build Product: Wine Version: 5.11 Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: regression Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: dmitry(a)baikal.ru Distribution: --- Steps to reproduce: cd wine/dlls/ntdll/tests make info.ok info.c:1843: Test failed: got c0000019 info.c:1846: Test failed: wrong major version cccc/4 info.c:1848: Test failed: wrong minor version cccc/0 In fact it never worked from the point when it was added: commit 54a7e592e44622ecd61160498fb5148a46b2e8db Author: Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org> Date: Tue May 26 13:23:21 2020 +0200 ntdll: Implement ProcessImageInformation class in NtQueryInformationProcess(). It looks like in a not PE build process->views on the server side is always empty, and as a result mapping.c,find_mapped_view() returns NOT_MAPPED_VIEW. There's no a single DLL in the process->views, and that's a real regression, probably caused by the movement to PE/ntdll unixlib introduction. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49484 Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords|regression | --- Comment #1 from Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org> --- I don't think it's a regression, we've never created views for .so dlls. It's not clear how we would do it since they don't have a corresponding mapping. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49484 Dmitry Timoshkov <dmitry(a)baikal.ru> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed by SHA1| |ced3892c65b33149a490b2c2191 | |098c0c6aa1eeb Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW |RESOLVED --- Comment #2 from Dmitry Timoshkov <dmitry(a)baikal.ru> --- Fixed by ced3892c65b33149a490b2c2191098c0c6aa1eeb. Thanks Alexandre. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49484 Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED --- Comment #3 from Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org> --- Closing bugs fixed in 6.1. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
participants (1)
-
WineHQ Bugzilla