November 2010 - Wine-devel - list.winehq.org

Re: xlive: add initial tests, make them pass under Wine
by Marvin 02 Nov '10

02 Nov '10

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=6708 Your paranoid android. === WINEBUILD (build) === Patch failed to apply Make failed

2 1

[RFC] cmd: Add a space at the end of the first echo'ed batch line [try5]
by GOUJON Alexandre 02 Nov '10

02 Nov '10

Hi everyone, I'm trying to fix the wine cmd behavior but as this 5th try differs greatly with the previous one, I'd like to have some feedback before submitting it. If you have any question, just let me know. Thanks is advance.

4 5

Re: [5/5] msxml3: Fix node_get_text() whitespace handling
by Marvin 02 Nov '10

02 Nov '10

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=6694 Your paranoid android. === WINEBUILD (build) === Patch failed to apply

1 0

DDRAW: New implementation of SetCooperativeLevel (a new try)
by paulo lesgaz 02 Nov '10

02 Nov '10

Hello, In waiting for my last patch of test for SetCooperativeLevel being accepted, I send to the list my attempt to fix this function. With the attached patch,all the already implemented and all the forecoming tests succeded. I tried to implement Henri's idea about the logic of this function (see http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2010-August/086201.html ) Any feedback of this patch would be welcomed. Thanks in advance. A+ David

1 0

Re: [4/4] msxml3: Implement domdoc schema validation (resend)
by Marvin 02 Nov '10

02 Nov '10

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=6691 Your paranoid android. === WINEBUILD (build) === Make of import library failed Make of import library failed

1 0

Re: [3/4] msxml3: Add error code defines (resend)
by Marvin 02 Nov '10

02 Nov '10

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=6690 Your paranoid android. === WINEBUILD (build) === Make of import library failed Make of import library failed

1 0

Re: cmd: Add a space at the end of the first echo'ed batch line [try6]
by Marvin 02 Nov '10

02 Nov '10

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=6689 Your paranoid android. === WNT4WSSP6 (32 bit batch) === batch.c:173: Test failed: expected space batch.c:173: Test failed: expected space batch.c:173: Test failed: expected space batch.c:173: Test failed: expected space batch.c:173: Test failed: expected space batch.c:173: Test failed: expected space batch.c:173: Test failed: expected space batch.c:173: Test failed: expected space batch.c:173: Test failed: expected space batch.c:173: Test failed: expected space batch.c:173: Test failed: expected space === W2KPROSP4 (32 bit batch) === batch.c:173: Test failed: expected space batch.c:173: Test failed: expected space batch.c:173: Test failed: expected space batch.c:173: Test failed: expected space batch.c:173: Test failed: expected space batch.c:173: Test failed: expected space batch.c:173: Test failed: expected space batch.c:173: Test failed: expected space batch.c:173: Test failed: expected space batch.c:173: Test failed: expected space batch.c:173: Test failed: expected space === WXPPROSP3 (32 bit batch) === batch.c:173: Test failed: expected space batch.c:173: Test failed: expected space batch.c:173: Test failed: expected space batch.c:173: Test failed: expected space batch.c:173: Test failed: expected space batch.c:173: Test failed: expected space batch.c:173: Test failed: expected space batch.c:173: Test failed: expected space batch.c:173: Test failed: expected space batch.c:173: Test failed: expected space batch.c:173: Test failed: expected space === W2K3R2SESP2 (32 bit batch) === batch.c:173: Test failed: expected space batch.c:173: Test failed: expected space batch.c:173: Test failed: expected space batch.c:173: Test failed: expected space batch.c:173: Test failed: expected space batch.c:173: Test failed: expected space batch.c:173: Test failed: expected space batch.c:173: Test failed: expected space batch.c:173: Test failed: expected space batch.c:173: Test failed: expected space batch.c:173: Test failed: expected space === WVISTAADM (32 bit batch) === batch.c:173: Test failed: expected space batch.c:173: Test failed: expected space batch.c:173: Test failed: expected space batch.c:173: Test failed: expected space batch.c:173: Test failed: expected space batch.c:173: Test failed: expected space batch.c:173: Test failed: expected space batch.c:173: Test failed: expected space batch.c:173: Test failed: expected space batch.c:173: Test failed: expected space batch.c:173: Test failed: expected space === W2K8SE (32 bit batch) === batch.c:173: Test failed: expected space batch.c:173: Test failed: expected space batch.c:173: Test failed: expected space batch.c:173: Test failed: expected space batch.c:173: Test failed: expected space batch.c:173: Test failed: expected space batch.c:173: Test failed: expected space batch.c:173: Test failed: expected space batch.c:173: Test failed: expected space batch.c:173: Test failed: expected space batch.c:173: Test failed: expected space === W7PRO (32 bit batch) === batch.c:173: Test failed: expected space batch.c:173: Test failed: expected space batch.c:173: Test failed: expected space batch.c:173: Test failed: expected space batch.c:173: Test failed: expected space batch.c:173: Test failed: expected space batch.c:173: Test failed: expected space batch.c:173: Test failed: expected space batch.c:173: Test failed: expected space batch.c:173: Test failed: expected space batch.c:173: Test failed: expected space === W7PROX64 (32 bit batch) === batch.c:173: Test failed: expected space batch.c:173: Test failed: expected space batch.c:173: Test failed: expected space batch.c:173: Test failed: expected space batch.c:173: Test failed: expected space batch.c:173: Test failed: expected space batch.c:173: Test failed: expected space batch.c:173: Test failed: expected space batch.c:173: Test failed: expected space batch.c:173: Test failed: expected space batch.c:173: Test failed: expected space === W7PROX64 (64 bit batch) === batch.c:173: Test failed: expected space batch.c:173: Test failed: expected space batch.c:173: Test failed: expected space batch.c:173: Test failed: expected space batch.c:173: Test failed: expected space batch.c:173: Test failed: expected space batch.c:173: Test failed: expected space batch.c:173: Test failed: expected space batch.c:173: Test failed: expected space batch.c:173: Test failed: expected space batch.c:173: Test failed: expected space

1 0

Re: ddraw: Add tests for SetCooperativeLevel with a NULL window
by Marvin 02 Nov '10

02 Nov '10

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=6682 Your paranoid android. === W98SE (32 bit ddrawmodes) === ddrawmodes: unhandled exception c0000005 at 004122E8 === W7PROX64 (64 bit ddrawmodes) === Timeout

1 0

Re: [PATCH 1/3] winmm: mciSendString always returns a response string (albeit empty). [resend]
by Marvin 02 Nov '10

02 Nov '10

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=6679 Your paranoid android. === W98SE (32 bit mci) === mci.c:846: Test failed: Expect message 0001 from play to 250 wait notify mci.c:853: Test failed: got 0004 instead of MCI_NOTIFY_xyz 0000 from command after close

1 0

Re: [PATCH 2/2] hlink: Site data should only be set if the hlink has an HlinkSite
by Marvin 02 Nov '10

02 Nov '10

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=6677 Your paranoid android. === W2K8SE (32 bit htmldoc) === htmldoc.c:2241: Test failed: unexpected call UpdateUI htmldoc.c:2466: Test failed: unexpected call Exec_UPDATECOMMANDS

1 0