May 2010 - Wine-devel - list.winehq.org

current state of full screen on MacOS?
by Joerg-Cyril.Hoehle＠t-systems.com 20 Oct '10

20 Oct '10

Hi, I'd like to know whether a MacOSX user can expect full screen modes to work, as I've heard only rumors and too little facts. My experience is this: + winecfg's window opens fine even with desktop set uo full screen, no window. E.g. as in the initial setting after rm -rf ~/.wine; wine winecfg. + Likewise, other programs opening windows work fine (regedit, notepad etc.). - Programs that offer a "select screen resolution" requester present a list whose largest vertical/Y resolution is 22 pixel less than what the monitor offers. I believe OSX reserves some place for its menu bar. Lower resolution entries, e.g. 1024x768 and 800x600, are listed normally. They work in desktop window mode. - Programs that want to make use of full screen fail or hang somehow. The issue may be two-fold: a) full screen does not work at all, or b) switching to full screen resolutions less than my LCD's native resolution does not work, and applications do not cope with that. E.g. many want to display a low-resolution intro video. - Approx. two monthes ago, a hybrid desktop mode was implemented in Wine: eliminate the desktop window when it matches the full screen size; recreate it when switching back to lower resolutions. I've not observed that effect either, but the idea is brilliant. I've heard that OSX would not switch to lower resolutions like Linux machines do with e.g. xrandr -s 1 or -s 2 etc. My LCD monitor can stretch low resolution VGA signals, e.g. when plugged to a Linux netbook. However the "early 2009" nVidia Macs do not produce analog video signals anymore, and I'm using the DVI-D output. What's the current state of Wine (and Darwine) w.r.t. full screen mode? Is it just my digital DVI + LCD setting or is there an issue with Wine? I've built Wine-1.1.24 with OSX 10.5.7 and XQuartz 2.3.3.2. Thank you, Jörg Höhle.

3 2

Wine without X? Failing in dlls/winex11.drv
by Gerald Pfeifer 19 Sep '10

19 Sep '10

Trying to build Wine on a new tester which initially had too few packages installed I ran into the following. In file included from bitblt.c:33: x11drv.h:30:22: error: X11/Xlib.h: No such file or directory x11drv.h:31:27: error: X11/Xresource.h: No such file or directory x11drv.h:32:23: error: X11/Xutil.h: No such file or directory x11drv.h:33:23: error: X11/Xatom.h: No such file or directory x11drv.h:44:21: error: X11/Xmd.h: No such file or directory x11drv.h:45:24: error: X11/Xproto.h: No such file or directory Indeed include/config.h has HAVE_X11_XLIB_H undefined since, well, all these headers indeed are missing. On the other hand, configure did not halt. In fact, configure did not even warn about this situation unlike it does in other cases. How to fix this? Should dlls/winex11.drv just not be built in such a case? Should configure error out? (We do have --without-x, too, though.) Anything else? Currently we do pass configure and then run into a compile failure later on. Gerald

3 3

autoconf 2.62 failure due to AS_VAR_IF
by Gerald Pfeifer 19 Sep '10

19 Sep '10

Using autoconf 2.62 on my primary test system I am getting: configure:26081: error: possibly undefined macro: AS_VAR_IF Indeed use of AS_VAR_IF appears relatively new, and it seems this may be similar to AS_VAR_APPEND where we have the following in configure.ac: dnl autoconf versions before 2.63b don't have AS_VAR_APPEND m4_ifdef([AS_VAR_APPEND],,[as_fn_append () { eval $[1]=\$$[1]\$[2]; } AC_DEFUN([AS_VAR_APPEND],[as_fn_append $1 $2])])dnl I assume we need something similar here, too? I am really far from an autoconf hacker -- is this something one of you could look into? Gerald

1 1

Re: Remove code which has been #if 0-ed for 11 years from DOSCONF_Device and DOSCONF_Install. (RESEND)
by Alexandre Julliard 19 Sep '10

19 Sep '10

Gerald Pfeifer <gerald(a)pfeifer.com> writes: > An alternate patch would be putting #if 0 around the first occurrence > of loadhigh, too, but this code has been marked dead for more than 11 > years, so I really think it can / should go? It doesn't make sense to parse and not do anything with it. If you want to remove dead code you can remove essentially the entire file. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org

2 1

Re: Use GCC's -Wlogical-op if possible
by Austin English 19 Sep '10

19 Sep '10

On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 12:32 PM, Gerald Pfeifer<gerald(a)pfeifer.com> wrote: > I verified this does not cause any extra warnings with GCC 4.4, whereas > GCC 4.5 will become quite a bit more useful in that regard and thus help > spot any issues. > > As with -Wtype-limits that I suggested last year, I pledge to keep close > an eye on this and to address any issues proactively as part of my nightly > test builds. > > Gerald > > ChangeLog: > Use GCC's -Wlogical-op if possible. > > diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac > index bef311e..3f7a657 100644 > --- a/configure.ac > +++ b/configure.ac > @@ -1385,8 +1385,9 @@ then > WINE_TRY_CFLAGS([-fno-builtin],[AC_SUBST(BUILTINFLAG,"-fno-builtin")]) > WINE_TRY_CFLAGS([-fno-strict-aliasing]) > WINE_TRY_CFLAGS([-Wdeclaration-after-statement]) > - WINE_TRY_CFLAGS([-Wwrite-strings]) > + WINE_TRY_CFLAGS([-Wlogical-op]) > WINE_TRY_CFLAGS([-Wtype-limits]) > + WINE_TRY_CFLAGS([-Wwrite-strings]) > > dnl Check for noisy string.h > saved_CFLAGS="$CFLAGS" > > > Causes 106 more warnings on 4.3.3 of this sort: tab.c:693: warning: logical ‘&&’ with non-zero constant will always evaluate as true cert.c:1627: warning: logical ‘||’ with non-zero constant will always evaluate as true -- -Austin

8 18

Re: [PATCH] winedbg: gdb proxy mode: support qAttached packet
by Eric Pouech 30 Aug '10

30 Aug '10

Paul Bolle a écrit : > Add support for the qAttached packet. Main benefit is that if gdb was > attached to a debuggee and it quits it will now ask if it should detach > from the debuggee instead of asking whether the debuggee should be > killed. (It still will ask whether the debuggee should be killed if it > launched the debuggee itself). > > Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle <pebolle(a)tiscali.nl> > --- > Would it be better to add a new member to gdbctx instead of using a > separate variable (qAttached_reply)? > yes, inclusion in gdbctx is preferred (and storage should rather be an integer rather than a string pointer) A+ -- Eric Pouech "The problem with designing something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of a complete idiot." (Douglas Adams)

2 1

Re: [PATCH 2/3] winex11.drv: set global key state
by Alexandre Julliard 17 Aug '10

17 Aug '10

Rafał Miłecki <zajec5(a)gmail.com> writes: > @@ -1250,6 +1250,21 @@ void X11DRV_send_keyboard_input( WORD wVk, WORD wScan, DWORD event_flags, DWORD > key_state_table[wVkStripped] = key_state_table[wVkL] | key_state_table[wVkR]; > } > > + SERVER_START_REQ( set_global_key_state ) > + { > + req->key = wVk; > + req->state = key_state_table[wVk]; > + wine_server_call( req ); > + } > + SERVER_END_REQ; > + SERVER_START_REQ( set_global_key_state ) > + { > + req->key = wVkStripped; > + req->state = key_state_table[wVkStripped]; > + wine_server_call( req ); > + } > + SERVER_END_REQ; > + You don't want to add 2 extra server calls for every key, especially since the server already receives the necessary information through the key event. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org

3 2

Re: comctl32: Simplify is_textT by omitting isW.
by Nikolay Sivov 15 Aug '10

15 Aug '10

On 5/9/2010 16:43, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > isW is not actually used by is_textT, so we can simplify listview.c a > bit by omitting the useless parameter. > > > > -static inline BOOL is_textT(LPCWSTR text, BOOL isW) > +static inline BOOL is_textT(LPCWSTR text) > > There's no reason to keep this helper then. It's better to rename is_textW() to is_text() and remove is_textT().

2 1

Re: gdi32: use usp10 to optionally generate glyphs for bidi strings
by Dmitry Timoshkov 08 Aug '10

08 Aug '10

Aric Stewart <aric(a)codeweavers.com> wrote: > allows us to be able to make use of the mirroring code and eventually > the shaping code when it is in place. This should be done the other way around. gdi32 should not depend on a high level dll (that creates circular dependencies), gdi32 in Windows doesn't use usp10 either. -- Dmitry.

4 5

TRACE () documentation
by James McKenzie 04 Jul '10

04 Jul '10

All: Is there documentation anywhere on how to use the TRACE command? I am trying to print out the contents of a UNICODE string using this commnd. Thank you. James McKenzie

4 8