October 2011 - Wine-devel - list.winehq.org

Re: [3/4] d3d9/tests: Test partial block locks
by Henri Verbeet 01 Nov '11

01 Nov '11

On 31 October 2011 20:03, Stefan Dösinger <stefan(a)codeweavers.com> wrote: > + case D3DPOOL_SCRATCH: > + case D3DPOOL_SYSTEMMEM: > + hr = IDirect3DDevice9_CreateOffscreenPlainSurface(device, 128, 128, formats[i].fmt, > + D3DPOOL_SCRATCH, &surface, 0); That doesn't really test D3DPOOL_SYSTEMMEM.

2 1

Re: [PATCH 2/5] wined3d: Create the DIB section for DDSCAPS_OWNDC surfaces on initialization.
by Stefan Dösinger 01 Nov '11

01 Nov '11

On Monday 31 October 2011 19:48:12 Henri Verbeet wrote: > --- > dlls/ddraw/surface.c | 3 +++ > dlls/wined3d/surface.c | 11 +++++++++++ > include/wine/wined3d.h | 1 + > 3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/dlls/ddraw/surface.c b/dlls/ddraw/surface.c > index 3860959..567d086 100644 > --- a/dlls/ddraw/surface.c > +++ b/dlls/ddraw/surface.c > @@ -5273,6 +5273,9 @@ HRESULT ddraw_surface_init(IDirectDrawSurfaceImpl > *surface, IDirectDrawImpl *ddr if (desc->ddsCaps.dwCaps & DDSCAPS_ZBUFFER) > usage |= WINED3DUSAGE_DEPTHSTENCIL; > > + if (desc->ddsCaps.dwCaps & DDSCAPS_OWNDC) > + usage |= WINED3DUSAGE_OWNDC; You would get the same effect by calling GetDC and ReleaseDC from ddraw or ddrawex without another usage flag. Probably ddrawex should do that since it sets DDSCAPS_OWNDC, assuming that IE 8 still uses ddrawex. > + /* Similar to lockable rendertargets above, creating the DIB section > + * during surface initialization prevents the sysmem pointer from > changing + * after a wined3d_surface_getdc() call. */ Is this a property of DDSCAPS_OWNDC, or sysmem surfaces in general? I'd expect that this applies to sysmem surfaces in general. Otoh we don't really want to create a DIB section for every sysmem surface, especially with bug 5535 in mind.

2 2

Re: [4/4] wined3d: YUY2 and UYVY are block based
by Marvin 01 Nov '11

01 Nov '11

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=15193 Your paranoid android. === WINEBUILD (build) === Patch failed to apply

1 0

Re: [3/4] d3d9/tests: Test partial block locks
by Marvin 01 Nov '11

01 Nov '11

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=15192 Your paranoid android. === WINEBUILD (build) === Patch failed to apply

1 0

Re: ddraw/tests: Move some surface attachment tests from refcount to dsurface and enhance them.
by Marvin 01 Nov '11

01 Nov '11

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=15183 Your paranoid android. === W2KPROSP4 (32 bit dsurface) === dsurface.c:1470: Test failed: AddAttachedSurface returned 8876000a === WXPPROSP3 (32 bit dsurface) === dsurface.c:1470: Test failed: AddAttachedSurface returned 8876000a === W2K3R2SESP2 (32 bit dsurface) === dsurface.c:1470: Test failed: AddAttachedSurface returned 8876000a === WVISTAADM (32 bit dsurface) === dsurface.c:1470: Test failed: AddAttachedSurface returned 8876000a === W2K8SE (32 bit dsurface) === dsurface.c:1470: Test failed: AddAttachedSurface returned 8876000a === W7PRO (32 bit dsurface) === dsurface.c:1470: Test failed: AddAttachedSurface returned 8876000a === W7PROX64 (32 bit dsurface) === dsurface.c:1470: Test failed: AddAttachedSurface returned 8876000a === TEST64_W7SP1 (32 bit dsurface) === dsurface.c:1470: Test failed: AddAttachedSurface returned 8876000a === W7PROX64 (64 bit dsurface) === dsurface.c:1470: Test failed: AddAttachedSurface returned 8876000a === TEST64_W7SP1 (64 bit dsurface) === dsurface.c:1470: Test failed: AddAttachedSurface returned 8876000a

1 0

Re: [4/4] wined3d: YUY2 and UYVY are block based
by Henri Verbeet 01 Nov '11

01 Nov '11

On 31 October 2011 20:17, Stefan Dösinger <stefan(a)codeweavers.com> wrote: > {WINED3DFMT_ATI2N, GL_COMPRESSED_LUMINANCE_ALPHA_3DC_ATI, GL_COMPRESSED_LUMINANCE_ALPHA_3DC_ATI, 0, > GL_LUMINANCE_ALPHA, GL_UNSIGNED_BYTE, 0, > - WINED3DFMT_FLAG_POSTPIXELSHADER_BLENDING | WINED3DFMT_FLAG_FILTERING, > + WINED3DFMT_FLAG_POSTPIXELSHADER_BLENDING | WINED3DFMT_FLAG_FILTERING | WINED3DFMT_FLAG_COMPRESSED, > GL_COMPRESSED_RED_GREEN_RGTC2 is also compressed.

1 0

Re: [PATCH 4/5] wined3d: Make the buffer parameter to buffer_is_dirty() const.
by Josh Juran 01 Nov '11

01 Nov '11

On Oct 31, 2011, at 11:48 AM, Henri Verbeet wrote: > --- > dlls/wined3d/buffer.c | 4 ++-- > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/dlls/wined3d/buffer.c b/dlls/wined3d/buffer.c > index 45518cc..69c110a 100644 > --- a/dlls/wined3d/buffer.c > +++ b/dlls/wined3d/buffer.c > @@ -76,9 +76,9 @@ static inline void buffer_clear_dirty_areas(struct wined3d_buffer *This) > This->modified_areas = 0; > } > > -static inline BOOL buffer_is_dirty(struct wined3d_buffer *This) > +static BOOL buffer_is_dirty(const struct wined3d_buffer *buffer) > { > - return !!This->modified_areas; > + return !!buffer->modified_areas; > } > > static inline BOOL buffer_is_fully_dirty(struct wined3d_buffer *This) > -- Looks like you lost an 'inline'. Was that intentional? Josh

2 1

Re: 80199: shdocvw: add a stub for InstallReg_RunDLL
by Dan Kegel 01 Nov '11

01 Nov '11

Fails to build here? On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 3:51 PM, <buildbot(a)kegel.com> wrote: > This is an experimental automated build and test service. > Please feel free to ignore this email while we work the kinks out. > > For more info about this message, see http://wiki.winehq.org/BuildBot > > The Buildbot has detected a failed build on builder runtests-default while building Wine. > Full details are available at: http://buildbot.kegel.com/builders/runtests-default/builds/803 (though maybe not for long, as I'm still reinstalling the buildbot periodically while experimenting) > BUILD FAILED: failed shell_2 > > Errors: > shdocvw_main.c: In function 'InstallReg_RunDLL': > shdocvw_main.c:547:159: error: format '%p' expects a matching 'void *' argument [-Werror=format] > shdocvw_main.c:547:159: error: format '%p' expects a matching 'void *' argument [-Werror=format] > make[1]: *** [shdocvw_main.o] Error 1 > make: *** [dlls/shdocvw] Error 2 > make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... > >

2 1

Re: [PATCH 2/5] ddraw: Implement copy_mipmap_chain() on top of wined3d_surface_blt().
by Stefan Dösinger 31 Oct '11

31 Oct '11

On Sunday 30 October 2011 18:06:33 Henri Verbeet wrote: > + if (FAILED(hr = > wined3d_surface_blt(dest_level->wined3d_surface, &dst_rect, > + src_level->wined3d_surface, &src_rect, 0, NULL, > WINED3DTEXF_POINT))) Wouldn't wined3d_device_update_surface be a better match? IDirect3DDevice7::Load could probably be handled by wined3d_device_update_texture if it wasn't for color keys/palettes.

2 1

RFC: Make X11 window rect empty for WS_EX_TRANSPARENT windows
by Octavian Voicu 31 Oct '11

31 Oct '11

Hi, Attached patch fixes http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28678. The root problem is that X11 windows cannot be made transparent (allowing other windows to draw over them). My approach I to make the X11 window with WS_EX_TRANSPARENT extended style have an empty region. Obviously, this is very hacky and except for very particular cases (like the bug I'm trying to fix) it won't work at all, so this patch is more like a proof-of-concept than a fix. For example, window decorations aren't drawn and not even the window can paint itself. This becomes kind of a recursive question -- how to draw the contents of the window-less window? Can this approach ever work? Any comments or suggestions are welcome. Octavian

1 0