October 2013 - Wine-devel - list.winehq.org

Re: Assorted spelling fixes.
by Marvin 02 Oct '13

02 Oct '13

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2432 Your paranoid android. === build (build) === Patch failed to apply

1 0

Re: Assorted spelling fixes.
by Marvin 02 Oct '13

02 Oct '13

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2431 Your paranoid android. === build (build) === Patch failed to apply

1 0

Re: Assorted spelling fixes.
by Marvin 02 Oct '13

02 Oct '13

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2430 Your paranoid android. === build (build) === Patch failed to apply

1 0

Re: Assorted spelling fixes.
by Marvin 02 Oct '13

02 Oct '13

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2429 Your paranoid android. === build (build) === Patch failed to apply

1 0

Re: [5/5] gdi32: Don't modify output glyph metrics unless the function succeeds. (resend)
by Marvin 02 Oct '13

02 Oct '13

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2426 Your paranoid android. === wvista (32 bit font) === The test timed out === w2008s64 (32 bit font) === Failure running script in VM: network read timed out === w2008s64 (64 bit font) === Failure running script in VM: network read timed out

1 0

Re: kernel32: Add tests for job objects (try 3)
by Nikolay Sivov 02 Oct '13

02 Oct '13

On 10/2/2013 12:58, Andrew Cook wrote: > + if(!pCreateJobObjectW) { > + win_skip("No job object support\n"); > + return; > + } Once you checked that I suppose you don't need to check for pIsProcessInJob being null, or it still could happen? > + if (option && strcmp(option, "wait") == 0) { > + /* for job object tests */ > + Sleep(3000); > + return; > + } Is it really necessary?

1 0

Re: winemac: Reapply display modes when switching back to app after "escaping" with Command-Tab.
by Ken Thomases 02 Oct '13

02 Oct '13

On Oct 1, 2013, at 11:24 PM, Ken Thomases wrote: > May fix bug <http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34475>. Should fix bug <http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34209>, too. -Ken

1 0

Re: mshtml: Added support for 'document' and 'window' script for attribute values.
by Marvin 01 Oct '13

01 Oct '13

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2427 Your paranoid android. === build (build) === Patch failed to apply

1 0

Re: imm32: ImmGetCandidateWindow should not return unset data
by Alexandre Julliard 01 Oct '13

01 Oct '13

Aric Stewart <aric(a)codeweavers.com> writes: > @@ -663,6 +663,8 @@ HIMC WINAPI ImmCreateContext(void) > gl->dwSize = sizeof(GUIDELINE); > ImmUnlockIMCC(new_context->IMC.hGuideLine); > > + memset(new_context->IMC.cfCandForm, -1, sizeof(new_context->IMC.cfCandForm)); > + That's ugly. If you are using the index for validity checking then you should put some appropriate value in there, there's no reason to put garbage in the whole structure. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org

2 1

Re: mscoree: Implement CreateInterface
by Vincent Povirk 01 Oct '13

01 Oct '13

Any reason not to share code with CLRCreateInstance?

1 0