November 2013 - Wine-devel - list.winehq.org

Re: d3d9/tests: add check for D3DFMT_V8U8 support to avoid possible test crash.
by Stefan Dösinger 02 Nov '13

02 Nov '13

On which GPU does that occur? Pixel Shader 1.x mandates V8U8 support afaik, so I am surprised this happens. I’m not opposed to this change conceptually though. > + IDirect3D9_Release(d3d9); > + if(FAILED(hr)) { > + skip("D3DFMT_V8U8 not supported\n"); > + return; > + } Please watch the formatting. Add a space between if and (, and put the { on the next line. Yeah, I know, the existing code isn’t quite consistent :-( . Am 02.11.2013 um 07:23 schrieb Alexander Dorofeyev <alexd4(a)inbox.lv>: > --- > dlls/d3d9/tests/visual.c | 10 ++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) > > > <0002-d3d9-tests-add-check-for-D3DFMT_V8U8-support-to-avoid-.txt>

2 1

Wineconf videos
by Stefan Dösinger 02 Nov '13

02 Nov '13

Hi, A few months ago I prepared some video recordings from Wineconf. They are on Youtube, but were never announced properly. So I’m sending a mail to the list, better late than never. Here are the links: Keynote: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZsG2xhtGIUI Vincent’s Mono Talk: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZBO1B7E3B64 My 3D performance talk: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T4ACXvm2gbc The sound and video quality is not too great. Most of this was filmed with my compact camera or my laptop’s webcam, and sound was recorded with my phone lying on the presentation table. But I believe it is good enough to understand the contents of the talk and it didn’t interrupt the conference flow. Librin from #winehackers is preparing videos of the other talks: André and Vincent’s ARM talk, Rosanne’s wine for users talk and I believe the last one was Francois about the testbot. Cheers, Stefan

1 0

Re: [PATCH] vbscript/tests: Use a defined name for error code
by Marvin 02 Nov '13

02 Nov '13

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=3179 Your paranoid android. === w864 (64 bit createobj) === createobj.c:1011: Test failed: hres = 800a0046

1 0

Re: winex11.drv: Add TIMESTAMP to X clipboard TARGETS
by Alexandre Julliard 01 Nov '13

01 Nov '13

Andrey Vostrikov <andrey.vostrikov(a)cogentembedded.com> writes: > + else if(event->target == x11drv_atom(TIMESTAMP)) /* Return event timestamp */ > + { > + /* TIMESTAMP selection request */ > + XChangeProperty(display, request, rprop, event->target, > + 32, PropModeReplace, (unsigned char*)&event->time, 1); That's not the correct timestamp. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org

3 4

Re: [PATCH] mmdevapi/tests: Update some error values for Windows 8.1
by Marvin 01 Nov '13

01 Nov '13

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=3171 Your paranoid android. === wvista (32 bit render) === render.c:1205: Test failed: GetPosition failed: 00000001

1 0

Fwd: attention all projects: Google is discontinuing Google Checkout
by Jeremy White 01 Nov '13

01 Nov '13

Anyone want to patch the web site to take down the Google checkout button? Cheers, Jeremy -------- Original Message -------- Subject: attention all projects: Google is discontinuing Google Checkout Resent-Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2013 10:19:59 -0400 Resent-From: bkuhn(a)ebb.org (Bradley M. Kuhn) Resent-To: project-reps(a)sfconservancy.org Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 15:01:52 -0400 From: Tony Sebro <tony(a)sfconservancy.org> To: project-reps(a)sfconservancy.org Hi, all: If you haven't heard, Google has announced that they will discontinue their Google Checkout payment service on November 20, 2013[1]. All Member Projects must remove any Google Checkout donation details (e.g., links, applets, etc.) from their website by November 13. You should also publish an announcement or blog post letting your respective communities know about the pending change. Once Google Checkout is discontinued, PayPal will be the only online payment service that Conservancy supports - at least, until we can find another suitable replacement. We're currently investigating other solutions for additional credit card donation processing, but each solution brings their own set of problems and flaws. If and when we're able to find another service, we'll make another announcement and send around the information necessary to collect donations via your Projects' respective websites. On a separate note: Conservancy has created [members-discuss], a new discussion list for cross-project issues, like this one. You can register here: https://lists.sfconservancy.org/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss Conservancy will still use the [project-reps] mailing list to send out org-wide announcements to all of our Projects. But, if you'd like to participate in discussions with your sister Projects, feel free to join and post to the [members-discuss] list. Thanks! Best, -Tony [1] http://support.google.com/checkout/sell/answer/3080449 -- Tony Sebro, General Counsel, Software Freedom Conservancy +1-212-461-3245 x11 tony(a)sfconservancy.org www.sfconservancy.org

2 1

Re: msvcp: fixed complex division
by Piotr Caban 01 Nov '13

01 Nov '13

On 11/01/13 00:44, Andrey Zhezherun wrote: > This patch implements complex division correctly. The existing > implementation did something else which is not division. How about making it more numerically safe? Something like this should do the job: if(|c|>=|d|) (a+ib)/(c+id) = ((a+b(d/c))+i(b-a(d/c)))/(c+d(d/c)) else (a+ib)/(c+id) = ((a(c/d)+b)+i(b(c/d)-a))/(c(c/d)+d) Thanks, Piotr

1 0

Re: winhttp/tests: Fix the test failure messages.
by Marvin 01 Nov '13

01 Nov '13

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=3165 Your paranoid android. === w8 (32 bit url) === url.c:465: Test failed: unexpected path: L"?" url.c:467: Test failed: unexpected extra info: L"?" url.c:468: Test failed: unexpected extra info length: 1

1 0

Re: kernel32/tests: Remove a couple of incorrect CreateFile() console tests.
by Marvin 01 Nov '13

01 Nov '13

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=3163 Your paranoid android. === w8 (32 bit console) === console.c:1113: Test failed: Expected OpenConsoleW to return INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE for index 18, got 00000144 console.c:1113: Test failed: Expected OpenConsoleW to return INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE for index 20, got 00000154 console.c:1113: Test failed: Expected OpenConsoleW to return INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE for index 21, got 00000150 console.c:1113: Test failed: Expected OpenConsoleW to return INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE for index 22, got 0000014C console.c:1113: Test failed: Expected OpenConsoleW to return INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE for index 23, got 00000158 console.c:1113: Test failed: Expected OpenConsoleW to return INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE for index 24, got 0000015C console.c:1113: Test failed: Expected OpenConsoleW to return INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE for index 25, got 00000160 console.c:1113: Test failed: Expected OpenConsoleW to return INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE for index 26, got 00000164 console.c:1113: Test failed: Expected OpenConsoleW to return INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE for index 28, got 00000168 console.c:1113: Test failed: Expected OpenConsoleW to return INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE for index 29, got 0000016C console.c:1113: Test failed: Expected OpenConsoleW to return INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE for index 30, got 00000170 console.c:1113: Test failed: Expected OpenConsoleW to return INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE for index 31, got 00000174 console.c:1113: Test failed: Expected OpenConsoleW to return INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE for index 32, got 00000178 console.c:1113: Test failed: Expected OpenConsoleW to return INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE for index 33, got 0000017C console.c:1420: Test failed: [13] Expected output count to be 0, got 2359244 console.c:1420: Test failed: [15] Expected output count to be 0, got 2359244 console.c:1420: Test failed: [18] Expected output count to be 3735928559, got 2359244 console.c:1663: Test failed: [13] Expected output count to be 0, got 2359244 console.c:1663: Test failed: [15] Expected output count to be 0, got 2359244 console.c:1663: Test failed: [18] Expected output count to be 3735928559, got 2359244 === w864 (32 bit console) === console.c:1113: Test failed: Expected OpenConsoleW to return INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE for index 18, got 00000138 console.c:1113: Test failed: Expected OpenConsoleW to return INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE for index 20, got 0000013C console.c:1113: Test failed: Expected OpenConsoleW to return INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE for index 21, got 0000014C console.c:1113: Test failed: Expected OpenConsoleW to return INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE for index 22, got 00000148 console.c:1113: Test failed: Expected OpenConsoleW to return INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE for index 23, got 00000144 console.c:1113: Test failed: Expected OpenConsoleW to return INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE for index 24, got 00000150 console.c:1113: Test failed: Expected OpenConsoleW to return INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE for index 25, got 00000154 console.c:1113: Test failed: Expected OpenConsoleW to return INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE for index 26, got 00000158 console.c:1113: Test failed: Expected OpenConsoleW to return INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE for index 28, got 0000015C console.c:1113: Test failed: Expected OpenConsoleW to return INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE for index 29, got 00000160 console.c:1113: Test failed: Expected OpenConsoleW to return INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE for index 30, got 00000164 console.c:1113: Test failed: Expected OpenConsoleW to return INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE for index 31, got 00000168 console.c:1113: Test failed: Expected OpenConsoleW to return INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE for index 32, got 0000016C console.c:1113: Test failed: Expected OpenConsoleW to return INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE for index 33, got 00000170 console.c:1420: Test failed: [13] Expected output count to be 0, got 2003875511 console.c:1420: Test failed: [15] Expected output count to be 0, got 2003875511 console.c:1420: Test failed: [18] Expected output count to be 3735928559, got 2003875511 console.c:1663: Test failed: [13] Expected output count to be 0, got 2003875511 console.c:1663: Test failed: [15] Expected output count to be 0, got 2003875511 console.c:1663: Test failed: [18] Expected output count to be 3735928559, got 2003875511 === w864 (64 bit console) === console.c:1113: Test failed: Expected OpenConsoleW to return INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE for index 18, got 0000000000000054 console.c:1113: Test failed: Expected OpenConsoleW to return INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE for index 20, got 0000000000000058 console.c:1113: Test failed: Expected OpenConsoleW to return INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE for index 23, got 0000000000000060

1 0

Re: winhttp: netconn_query_data_available() is not used anymore so remove it.
by Jacek Caban 01 Nov '13

01 Nov '13

Hi Francois, On 11/01/13 10:34, Francois Gouget wrote: > --- > dlls/winhttp/net.c | 20 -------------------- > dlls/winhttp/winhttp_private.h | 1 - > 2 files changed, 21 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/dlls/winhttp/net.c b/dlls/winhttp/net.c > index 6d9b82a..ac8ae56 100644 > --- a/dlls/winhttp/net.c > +++ b/dlls/winhttp/net.c > @@ -712,26 +712,6 @@ BOOL netconn_recv( netconn_t *conn, void *buf, size_t len, int flags, int *recvd > return TRUE; > } > > -BOOL netconn_query_data_available( netconn_t *conn, DWORD *available ) > -{ > -#ifdef FIONREAD > - int ret; > - ULONG unread; > -#endif > - *available = 0; > - if (!netconn_connected( conn )) return FALSE; > - > - if (conn->secure) > - { > - *available = conn->peek_len; > - return TRUE; > - } > -#ifdef FIONREAD > - if (!(ret = ioctlsocket( conn->socket, FIONREAD, &unread ))) *available = unread; > -#endif > - return TRUE; > -} > - I think we should use this function instead. I will send a patch. Jacek

1 0