September 2013 - Wine-devel

Re: add ualapi directory (try 11)
by Marvin 28 Sep '13

28 Sep '13

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2386 Your paranoid android. === build (build) === Make failed

1 0

Re: (try 6)[5/5] imm32: limit cross thread access to ImmSet* functions
by Marvin 28 Sep '13

28 Sep '13

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2377 Your paranoid android. === build (build) === Patch failed to apply

1 0

Re: (try 6)[4/5] imm32: Restrict crossthread Association and destruction
by Marvin 28 Sep '13

28 Sep '13

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2376 Your paranoid android. === build (build) === Patch failed to apply

1 0

Re: (try 6)[3/5] imm32: use thread data from target HWND
by Marvin 27 Sep '13

27 Sep '13

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2375 Your paranoid android. === build (build) === Patch failed to apply

1 0

Re: [PATCH 2/2] mshtml: Added IHTMLFormElement::sumit tests.
by Marvin 27 Sep '13

27 Sep '13

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2374 Your paranoid android. === build (build) === Patch failed to apply

1 0

Re: [PATCH 1/2] appwiz.cpl: Use the same dialog template for Mono and Gecko downloader.
by Vincent Povirk 27 Sep '13

27 Sep '13

Isn't this going to make the caption "Wine Gecko Installer" in both cases?

1 0

Re: add ualapi directory (try 10)
by Marvin 27 Sep '13

27 Sep '13

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2370 Your paranoid android. === build (build) === Make failed

1 0

Re: [PATCH 1/5] wined3d: Send present operations through a command stream.
by Stefan Dösinger 27 Sep '13

27 Sep '13

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Am 2013-09-27 00:15, schrieb Henri Verbeet: > - swapchain->swapchain_ops->swapchain_present(swapchain, > src_rect, dst_rect, dirty_region, flags); + > wined3d_cs_emit_present(swapchain->device->cs, swapchain, > src_rect, + dst_rect, dst_window_override, dirty_region, > flags); I think we should place comments like "This function is called through the command stream" for all functions that are called through the CS, similar to what we do for context activation. Also note that swapchain_gl_present contains calls to wined3d_surface_blt and wined3d_device_clear that are going to cause problems with the multithreaded CS. I have patches to remove them, so feel free to ignore this problem for now. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJSRWaKAAoJEN0/YqbEcdMw9VgP/i2n/G2CHOA8XShC8CZnRzSq TNzbfIXwAQljQYtf66U98JmbMIoeS3SMPaJ4O1+mMiT062Udi3YddiTk2AVF9bi+ f6X4y9W8Q3jPolcuTxKpZ26/WFkViHtPEUtFaa5oBtksCNGZ0b3A4oK9zbrPBram EXwovsq649RqCoBf76aidtbypdkFKLfmC6P6KxtjB3C9cdKJ58kMD0YbVsua6zNc g8gUgExEQ0no9WEyWPtlN7PRf3tQlLtuUeqrRockqnK48cKbwk3VaEgfq8o6+INs EvgjoZvc2C/+YoEWUT+n7nCtIKo9IiMSG20Ey0sbmak/K/LrvZvsyHl78nQD4ss+ t5jRCS9QZs/VzJc0VakGsZARP9jGBvzapsrAcy6Ittu1d53fpji6ySwKeUrPKim+ wMtWGtu+q0FXtIRtgDYUOofd9b1o1sB3xPqUIpRm7+yBRpXiBvuGqbmbsa/14wBe vkI5b5S/djskw9M5bV1lAOCgGmo+zFIYyebxwvx8H+sqz4HmYql9uPLTOHqWvHtn J7iXcETOlcOrC+zOOT8nieR8YYuFcda51auvK5lnXtCTQvoQse5egV16x2hJkkjx Pujit58jX2/O0WS0hqR5oAfhYtPydqUf2BayXgkLUODiZa0z1UWD2eerlOvGSvcq AUs+vi2QpDjeWmQH37BZ =QcW+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

2 3

Re: [1/3] gdi32: Return fake BBox when requested empty glyph metrics. (try 3)
by Alexandre Julliard 27 Sep '13

27 Sep '13

Akihiro Sagawa <sagawa.aki(a)gmail.com> writes: > Fixes bug 18440, 20847. > > Try 3: > - Rebase to recent source. > - Separate ABC metrics change. > - Use conditional operator. It breaks the tests: ../../../tools/runtest -q -P wine -M gdi32.dll -T ../../.. -p gdi32_test.exe.so dib.c && touch dib.ok dib.c:2827: Test failed: hash mismatch - aa 0 dib.c:2827: Test failed: hash mismatch - aa 1 dib.c:2827: Test failed: hash mismatch - aa 0 dib.c:2827: Test failed: hash mismatch - aa 1 dib.c:2827: Test failed: hash mismatch - aa 0 dib.c:2827: Test failed: hash mismatch - aa 1 dib.c:2827: Test failed: hash mismatch - aa 0 dib.c:2827: Test failed: hash mismatch - aa 1 dib.c:2827: Test failed: hash mismatch - aa 0 dib.c:2827: Test failed: hash mismatch - aa 0 dib.c:2827: Test failed: hash mismatch - aa 1 dib.c:2827: Test failed: hash mismatch - aa 0 dib.c:2827: Test failed: hash mismatch - aa 0 dib.c:2827: Test failed: hash mismatch - aa 0 dib.c:2827: Test failed: hash mismatch - aa 0 dib.c:2827: Test failed: hash mismatch - aa 0 dib.c:2827: Test failed: hash mismatch - aa 0 dib.c:2827: Test failed: hash mismatch - aa 0 dib.c:2827: Test failed: hash mismatch - aa 0 make[1]: *** [dib.ok] Error 19 -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org

1 0

Re: [PATCH 1/3] riched20: Use codepage in ME_ToUnicode. (try 5)
by Nikolay Sivov 27 Sep '13

27 Sep '13

On 9/13/2013 13:27, Jactry Zeng wrote: > Re-based to latest git. > > Does it actually accept any other value besides CP_ACP or 1200? Documentation is unclear here, and makes impression that only two these values are valid.

2 2