April 2014 - Wine-devel - list.winehq.org

Re: [6/6] rpcrt4/tests: Add a couple of tests for marshalling an array of strings. Resend.
by Marvin 01 Apr '14

01 Apr '14

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=6100 Your paranoid android. === build (build) === Make failed

1 0

Re: msi: Fix infinite loop.
by Hans Leidekker 01 Apr '14

01 Apr '14

On Mon, 2014-03-31 at 16:48 -0500, Vincent Povirk wrote: > This loop never exits if progid->Parent == progid and there is no > class. There are other checks for that in the file, so I assume that > condition is supposed to be possible. Right, nothing keeps you from defining circular dependencies.

1 0

Re: [PATCH 1/2] ole32: Fix equality check in CommonPrefixWith() for pointer moniker (try2)
by Marvin 01 Apr '14

01 Apr '14

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=6093 Your paranoid android. === wvista (32 bit moniker) === moniker: unhandled exception c0000005 at 004256A9 === wvistau64 (32 bit moniker) === moniker: unhandled exception c0000005 at 004256A9 === w2008s64 (32 bit moniker) === moniker: unhandled exception c0000005 at 004256A9 === w7pro64 (32 bit moniker) === moniker: unhandled exception c0000005 at 004256A9 === w8 (32 bit moniker) === moniker: unhandled exception c0000005 at 004256A9 === wvistau64 (64 bit moniker) === moniker: unhandled exception c0000005 at 000000000042024A === w2008s64 (64 bit moniker) === moniker: unhandled exception c0000005 at 000000000042024A === w7pro64 (64 bit moniker) === moniker: unhandled exception c0000005 at 000000000042024A

1 0

Re: regsvr32: Replace printf calls with WriteConsole function (try 2)
by Lauri Kenttä 31 Mar '14

31 Mar '14

Sorry for being a bit late... Hugh McMaster wrote: > - printf("\t[/i] Call DllInstall passing it an optional > [cmdline];\n"); > - printf("\t when used with /u calls dll uninstall\n"); > +\ [/i] Call DllInstall, passing an optional [cmdline].\n\ > +\tWhen used with [/u], regsvr32 also calls DLL Uninstall.\n\ This whole "calls DLL Uninstall" thing is a bit weird, as there isn't a function named DLL Uninstall or DllUninstall. Maybe you should change it to something more exact like: "When used with [/u], " + 1) "passes [also] the uninstall flag [to DllInstall]" 2) "uses DllInstall to uninstall the DLL" 3) "the bInstall parameter is set to FALSE" 4) "calls DllInstall with bInstall set to FALSE" or something similar. Opinions? If this is too radical, I'd suggest that you at least remove the "also". With my English, it now says that regsvr32 /i /u calls DllInstall and also calls DLL Uninstall, which is clearly neither true nor logical. (It really calls UnregisterDll and DllInstall(FALSE,cmdline).) In addition, repeating "regsvr32" looks strange to me in this kind of context. -- Lauri Kenttä

3 4