May 2014 - Wine-devel - list.winehq.org

Fix for PlgBlt, the XFORM matrix was calculated incorrectly
by Alexander Almaleh 16 Jun '14

16 Jun '14

I had tried to submit a patch for that 5 years ago<http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2009-December/080391.html>, but couldn't figure out how to make a patch/test it, and eventually gave up and forgot about it. But recently I remembered about it, and now I want to try again. So, this time I've prepared a test that can prove that the previous implementation does not calculate the XFORM matrix correctly, and that my patch will fix it. The test is a VC6 project, you can find it at https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B9PGUhmmnsm1S2VvZzc3WmhBY3c/edit?usp=shari…. The test is a demo of PlgBlt that I found on CodeProject<http://www.codeproject.com/Articles/17712/The-GDI-magic-Rendering-reflectio…>. You can compare how it works on XP and on Wine. For testing, I directly inserted the original Wine implementation of PlgBlt, as well as my patched version, into the VC6 project, and tested on that. This is because there seems to be an additional problem with MaskBlt, which I'll try tackling next. I have screenshots of what the demo looks using Windows's PlgBlt<http://imgur.com/q8qKGd7>, and Wine's PlgBlt <http://imgur.com/smYEV6z>. To test it, simply look at this function in the VC6 project: BOOL MyPlgBlt( HDC hdcDest, const POINT *lpPoint, HDC hdcSrc, INT nXSrc, INT nYSrc, INT nWidth, INT nHeight, HBITMAP hbmMask, INT xMask, INT yMask) { // return MyPlgBltWinePatched(hdcDest, lpPoint, hdcSrc, nXSrc, nYSrc, nWidth, nHeight, hbmMask, xMask, yMask); return MyPlgBltWineUnpatched(hdcDest, lpPoint, hdcSrc, nXSrc, nYSrc, nWidth, nHeight, hbmMask, xMask, yMask); // return PlgBlt(hdcDest, lpPoint, hdcSrc, nXSrc, nYSrc, nWidth, nHeight, hbmMask, xMask, yMask); } Uncomment the function you want to test. If you need something else (like binaries), just write. And this is the patch itself. I've tried to keep the changes minimal, with respect to white-space, etc. I've removed a "return FALSE", because I don't calculate a determinant explicitly. commit c9ca2cab58fa0cba3d6b24cfb2af507fd1c07227 Author: Alexander Almaleh <sashoalm(a)gmail.com> Date: Tue May 20 18:33:55 2014 +0300 Fix for the calculation of the XFORM matrix in PlgBlt. diff --git a/dlls/gdi32/bitblt.c b/dlls/gdi32/bitblt.c index 4750d1b..1de25b9 100644 --- a/dlls/gdi32/bitblt.c +++ b/dlls/gdi32/bitblt.c @@ -992,22 +992,32 @@ BOOL WINAPI PlgBlt( HDC hdcDest, const POINT *lpPoint, HDC hdcSrc, INT nXSrc, INT nYSrc, INT nWidth, INT nHeight, HBITMAP hbmMask, INT xMask, INT yMask) { + /* we need to use floating-point precision when calculating the + * XFORM matrix to avoid loss of precision due to rounding */ + typedef struct tagPOINTLF + { + double x, y; + } POINTLF; + int oldgMode; /* parallelogram coords */ - POINT plg[3]; + POINTLF plg[3]; /* rect coords */ - POINT rect[3]; + POINTLF rect[3]; XFORM xf; XFORM SrcXf; XFORM oldDestXf; - double det; + int ii; /* save actual mode, set GM_ADVANCED */ oldgMode = SetGraphicsMode(hdcDest,GM_ADVANCED); if (oldgMode == 0) return FALSE; - memcpy(plg,lpPoint,sizeof(POINT)*3); + for (ii = 0; ii < 3; ii++) { + plg[ii].x = lpPoint[ii].x; + plg[ii].y = lpPoint[ii].y; + } rect[0].x = nXSrc; rect[0].y = nYSrc; rect[1].x = nXSrc + nWidth; @@ -1015,33 +1025,39 @@ BOOL WINAPI PlgBlt( HDC hdcDest, const POINT *lpPoint, rect[2].x = nXSrc; rect[2].y = nYSrc + nHeight; /* calc XFORM matrix to transform hdcDest -> hdcSrc (parallelogram to rectangle) */ - /* determinant */ - det = rect[1].x*(rect[2].y - rect[0].y) - rect[2].x*(rect[1].y - rect[0].y) - rect[0].x*(rect[2].y - rect[1].y); - - if (fabs(det) < 1e-5) - { - SetGraphicsMode(hdcDest,oldgMode); - return FALSE; - } TRACE("hdcSrc=%p %d,%d,%dx%d -> hdcDest=%p %d,%d,%d,%d,%d,%d\n", hdcSrc, nXSrc, nYSrc, nWidth, nHeight, hdcDest, plg[0].x, plg[0].y, plg[1].x, plg[1].y, plg[2].x, plg[2].y); /* X components */ - xf.eM11 = (plg[1].x*(rect[2].y - rect[0].y) - plg[2].x*(rect[1].y - rect[0].y) - plg[0].x*(rect[2].y - rect[1].y)) / det; - xf.eM21 = (rect[1].x*(plg[2].x - plg[0].x) - rect[2].x*(plg[1].x - plg[0].x) - rect[0].x*(plg[2].x - plg[1].x)) / det; - xf.eDx = (rect[0].x*(rect[1].y*plg[2].x - rect[2].y*plg[1].x) - - rect[1].x*(rect[0].y*plg[2].x - rect[2].y*plg[0].x) + - rect[2].x*(rect[0].y*plg[1].x - rect[1].y*plg[0].x) - ) / det; + xf.eM11 = -(rect[1].y*plg[2].x+rect[0].y*(plg[1].x-plg[2].x) + -rect[2].y*plg[1].x+plg[0].x*(rect[2].y-rect[1].y)) + /(rect[0].y*(rect[2].x-rect[1].x)-rect[1].y*rect[2].x+ + rect[2].y*rect[1].x+(rect[1].y-rect[2].y)*rect[0].x); + xf.eM21 = (plg[0].x*(rect[2].x-rect[1].x)-plg[1].x*rect[2].x + +plg[2].x*rect[1].x+(plg[1].x-plg[2].x)*rect[0].x) + /(rect[0].y*(rect[2].x-rect[1].x)-rect[1].y*rect[2].x + +rect[2].y*rect[1].x+(rect[1].y-rect[2].y)*rect[0].x); + xf.eDx = -(rect[0].y*(plg[2].x*rect[1].x-plg[1].x*rect[2].x) + +plg[0].x*(rect[1].y*rect[2].x-rect[2].y*rect[1].x) + +(rect[2].y*plg[1].x-rect[1].y*plg[2].x)*rect[0].x) + /(rect[0].y*(rect[2].x-rect[1].x)-rect[1].y*rect[2].x+rect[2].y + *rect[1].x+(rect[1].y-rect[2].y)*rect[0].x); /* Y components */ - xf.eM12 = (plg[1].y*(rect[2].y - rect[0].y) - plg[2].y*(rect[1].y - rect[0].y) - plg[0].y*(rect[2].y - rect[1].y)) / det; - xf.eM22 = (plg[1].x*(rect[2].y - rect[0].y) - plg[2].x*(rect[1].y - rect[0].y) - plg[0].x*(rect[2].y - rect[1].y)) / det; - xf.eDy = (rect[0].x*(rect[1].y*plg[2].y - rect[2].y*plg[1].y) - - rect[1].x*(rect[0].y*plg[2].y - rect[2].y*plg[0].y) + - rect[2].x*(rect[0].y*plg[1].y - rect[1].y*plg[0].y) - ) / det; + xf.eM12 = -(rect[1].y*(plg[2].y-plg[0].y)+rect[0].y*(plg[1].y + -plg[2].y)+rect[2].y*(plg[0].y-plg[1].y))/(rect[0].y*(rect[2].x + -rect[1].x)-rect[1].y*rect[2].x+rect[2].y*rect[1].x+(rect[1].y + -rect[2].y)*rect[0].x); + xf.eM22 = ((plg[0].y-plg[1].y)*rect[2].x+(plg[2].y-plg[0].y)*rect[1].x + +(plg[1].y-plg[2].y)*rect[0].x) /(rect[0].y*(rect[2].x-rect[1].x) + -rect[1].y*rect[2].x+rect[2].y*rect[1].x+(rect[1].y-rect[2].y) + *rect[0].x); + xf.eDy = (rect[0].y*(plg[1].y*rect[2].x-plg[2].y*rect[1].x) + -rect[1].y*plg[0].y*rect[2].x+rect[2].y*plg[0].y*rect[1].x + +(rect[1].y*plg[2].y-rect[2].y*plg[1].y)*rect[0].x)/(rect[0].y + *(rect[2].x-rect[1].x)-rect[1].y*rect[2].x+rect[2].y*rect[1].x + +(rect[1].y-rect[2].y)*rect[0].x); GetWorldTransform(hdcSrc,&SrcXf); CombineTransform(&xf,&xf,&SrcXf);

4 10

Re: wined3d: Recognize cards that expose GLSL 1.30 as DX10 capable even if they don't support EXT_GPU_SHADER4 (try 4)
by Stefan Dösinger 11 Jun '14

11 Jun '14

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Am 2014-05-30 00:45, schrieb Andrei Slăvoiu: > Add back glsl check to make sure the card is capable of DX10. > > --- dlls/wined3d/directx.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 > insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) Looks good to me. Note that Alexandre and Henri are on holidays right now, so it might take a while before it is committed or you receive further comments. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJTiD0QAAoJEN0/YqbEcdMwcjcP/jAOsNo8MoM8sSlc2RVtU7Y5 tHVmUyMZ0xPSa7DaA13GFT7/hPnRXimRY39epjJ3subulmprkXV+HNtaHWBVkEvR lB+YSJJDFGJ9V81o7aVSUfXydeY81C3TB6TbztO9WtVPSVaE9/ZXJ1ZO3edufoXT XhXMJwce9HmL8nU+SRFo+mAc/FLimCuTwMMf6OF61KlAMTkzGSQoh8sUSwO0hndL /+yARXxgYhBAtepVb2vuL7411/VWlbzrD8S8h4sZhEnCgLNuyGjXFyggjTZn+MWd zYf5MgBWmY/YJu1VES3lkM8VM5FpgJgEcM3DG8BEQ3yI5eyBLReMiKQe3uuyhlnJ KdE9tSPP3Ts2gHYeZ90kGImebtjy5sxA0gsekY5J4oNsbDUfO01OoHde+54GG6WD 25aogs1+edJNZMGI6pxScDl6EoPgbTlBjL5dJ2xDYc1P/ACezNqPBe+tCDoqoVon WBlqNSNntcfCUBEoiXpOcRFK0PeJDIMHRKpZEBM63V3gFW6w0KuI+Sj0JcwFxy+u saLOwXDpaGerhar2njWiCEKwM1NfW2Wj7wcY0/eiy56bi9UvhDCAUqqZ98xlFZuP m8Js4Bwzlp7NHQjaqXo/h3uK36B0OngHZkjRm/hXMEFuQHfCSbKtUMZLn27JI+3a chXJiqk95eUes6GLKzGo =tusS -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

3 2

Re: Recognize cards that expose GLSL 1.30 as DX10 capable even if they don't support EXT_GPU_SHADER4
by Stefan Dösinger 03 Jun '14

03 Jun '14

Am 23.05.2014 um 00:23 schrieb Andrei Slăvoiu <andrei.slavoiu(a)gmail.com>: > Mesa drivers do not expose EXT_GPU_SHADER4 as all functionality it offers is > already part of OpenGL 3.0. This causes all cards that are not explicitly > recognized by wine (for example all GCN cards) to be treated as DX9 cards and > presented to Windows apps as Radeon 9500. The problem is that without GL_EXT_gpu_shader4 or GL_ARB_shader_texture_lod we cannot handle the texldd instruction. Right now we cannot use core contexts, so unless the driver exposes one of those extensions in compatibility contexts we are stuck on a shader model 2 feature level :-( . The level detection your patch changes isn't directly related to this, as the shader model version support is controlled differently. But a Radeon 9500 matches a card with shader model 2 support much better than a Radeon R9. Does this driver / gpu combination support GL_ARB_shader_texture_lod?

4 9

Re: ntdll: Use lockfree implementation for get_cached_fd.
by Ken Thomases 02 Jun '14

02 Jun '14

On May 31, 2014, at 10:28 AM, Sebastian Lackner wrote: > Explanation: The basic idea of this patch is that we have a global > counter 'fd_cache_epoch' which is incremented, whenever the file > descriptor cache is updated. get_cached_fd() first reads the counter, > then the fd entry, and afterwards the counter again - if the counter has > changed we know that a second thread has maybe modified the content, and > have to read it again. The memory barrier is there to ensure that > compilers don't optimize away the two reads of 'fd_cache_epoch'. Please > note that: > > * the order of the write instructions when updating the content is > important - this way we ensure that threads only see either (0, *) = not > set, or a valid entry. > > * I assume that reading/writing up to the pointer size can be done as an > atomic operation (threads either see the old or new value, but no > partial updates). This assumption is also used in a lot other parts of > wine, for example here: > http://source.winehq.org/source/dlls/ntdll/sync.c#L1295 > [ It would probably be more safe to introduce special > interlocked_get/interlocked_set macros/functions for that, but not sure > what other people think about that... ] Thanks for working on this. Interesting stuff. I think there are still some issues. In order to ensure a consistent view of the ordering of memory operations, memory barriers have to be used in both the writer and the reader. The writer issues a write barrier after it has written and the reader issues a read barrier before it reads. The appropriate barriers are implicit in interlocked_xchg_add() for incrementing fd_cache_epoch, but the first read of it in get_cached_fd() has no read barrier before it. I think this is benign, though, because I think this can only result in the code thinking the epoch changed when it hasn't. It may retry unnecessarily. More problematic is the writing of the fd and its attributes. There are barriers implicit in the interlocked_xchg() which clears the fd, but there's no write barrier after the final write to it. There's no read barrier before the first read of them. You mention the order of writing, attributes first then fd, as being important. But there's no barrier in between the two operations, so either the compiler or the CPU could reorder either the writes or the reads, thwarting your design. The compiler can also reorder the reading of the fd_cache_epoch with respect to the reading of the fd or attributes. I think you can get this as the effective sequence: thread1 / get_cached_fd / read fd, get old fd thread2 / add_fd_to_cache / clear fd thread2 / add_fd_to_cache / increment epoch thread2 / add_fd_to_cache / set fd thread1 / get_cached_fd / read epoch thread1 / get_cached_fd / check if epoch has changed, conclude it hasn't thread1 / get_cached_fd / return old fd I think it's sufficient to have a write barrier after writing the fd and then a read barrier just before reading it. I _think_ that this obviates the need for the barrier at the bottom of the do-while loop. That is, you can just move that barrier up a line. I'm not 100% confident of my analysis of that. (Well, frankly, I'm never 100% certain of my analysis of this sort of code.) In the email thread regarding Daniel Horn's patch, I suggested an approach using interlocked_cmpxchg() to check if the fd had changed after reading the attributes. Was there a reason you rejected that approach? You mentioned an approach you experimented with using interlocked_cmpxchg64(). What was that about? Were you treating the fd and attributes combined as a single 64-bit value and then checking them both? Was that safer than my suggestion for some reason? If the only advantage is a slight performance improvement (especially in light of the huge difference that either approach has to the status quo, judging by your chart), then I'd argue for the simpler approach that's more easily analyzed for correctness. If the above issue is addressed, that leaves one remaining problem: get_cached_fd() can encounter a false negative: thread1 / add_fd_to_cache / set fd to -1 thread1 / add_fd_to_cache / increment epoch thread2 / get_cached_fd / read epoch thread2 / get_cached_fd / read attributes thread2 / get_cached_fd / read fd, gets -1 thread2 / get_cached_fd / check if epoch has changed, conclude it hasn't thread1 / add_fd_to_cache / set attributes thread1 / add_fd_to_cache / set fd thread2 / get_cached_fd / return -1 thread2 / server_get_unix_fd / see get_cached_fd as having failed since it returns -1 thread2 / server_get_unix_fd / do get_handle_fd server request thread2 / server_get_unix_fd / call add_fd_to_cache to cache the new fd I think you want to try get_cached_fd() again, inside the critical section, if the first call fails. -Ken

2 2

Video memory size detection in D3D
by Ruslan Kabatsayev 02 Jun '14

02 Jun '14

Hello all, It seems Wine doesn't use any way to reliably detect video memory size, and for many video cards needs it to be specified as HKCU\Software\Wine\Direct3D\VideoMemorySize key in registry. But there exist at least three (vendor-specific) GL/GLX extensions which seem to address exactly this. Namely, for Mesa it's GLX_MESA_query_renderer [1], for nVidia it's GL_NVX_gpu_memory_info [2], and for ATI/AMD it's GL_ATI_meminfo [3]. Mesa extension is shipping starting from Mesa 10.0, nVidia ships their extension in 195.XX drivers (said in specification; I have it exposed with my 313.09 driver), don't know status of ATI extension though (marked as "???" in spec). It'd be good if Wine could utilize these. Is there any work towards this already? Regards, Ruslan [1]: http://www.opengl.org/registry/specs/MESA/glx_query_renderer.txt [2]: https://www.opengl.org/registry/specs/NVX/gpu_memory_info.txt [3]: http://www.opengl.org/registry/specs/ATI/meminfo.txt

5 6

Re: wined3d: Recognize cards that expose ARB_shader_texture_lod as DX10 capable even if they don't support EXT_gpu_shader4 (try 3)
by Stefan Dösinger 02 Jun '14

02 Jun '14

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Am 2014-05-29 01:33, schrieb Andrei Slăvoiu: > Drop the check for glsl_version. All wine shaders use #version 120 > so it doesn't matter. That's not quite right. Yes, it is true that we never use GLSL 130, so the version check isn't representative for what wined3d actually supports. For shader model 4 support we need much more than just GLSL 130, half of the d3d10 infrastructure is still missing. GL_ARB_shader_texture_lod doesn't imply shader model 4 support. My Radeon X1600 supports this extension on OSX, and this is a shader model 3 card. The X1600 doesn't support EXT_gpu_shader4 or GLSL 130. The point of this code is to check the capabilities of the card, not the capabilities of our d3d implementation. Thus to prevent SM 3 cards from being reported with PCI IDs that suggest SM 4 capabilities you need to check for all the other functionality that's supported by EXT_gpu_shader4 / GLSL 130. Even if we have a SM 4 capable card our d3d9 implementation does not expose SM 4 support. But neither does Microsoft's d3d9 implementation. There's also GLX_MESA_query_renderer. It gives us the PCI IDs and video memory size directly, without all the string parsing guesswork. We cannot use it wined3d directly. A possible approach would be to expose a similar WGL_WINE/MESA_query_renderer extension from winex11.drv and winemac.drv and use that in wined3d. The current wined3d guesswork code could be moved to winex11.drv and used in cases where GLX_MESA_query_renderer is not supported. (OSX has similar functionality that's always available) User32 also has a function (EnumDisplayDevices) to query the GPU identification string, and some applications (Company of Heroes demo) fail if the user32 GPU name differs from the d3d9 GPU name. So maybe a WGL extension isn't quite the right interface, and it should be something that does not require a GL context so user32.dll can use it as well. EnumDisplayDevices does not export all the information wined3d needs though - the PCI IDs and video memory size are missing I think. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJThvZZAAoJEN0/YqbEcdMwsY8QAJG1NQVMSqjwaguVR0cwwNXq IMYCRWL+5cJPxK4Eodt4bF+zZDObqCz9r3hAJVlkA6bJIcflNHJwedT0ddeOAfpe 0Xc8g+NvspN715yNt51PpzcnlSqh2vS18qp1JLb4l00pZuPt8PMNqC0gaePkv+tY 1wY3B/kgbl0TfcIRpxWbwZBcIAM2h4g+FGCHFPFeznhMYWqFaJ67OKW1KAdfpBTT lPZsaNDXtU8hSaVQYVk7ITulUl0C8tW/MExnh4zclz6b/wQuG+/M0WRg5v/YDlNq 0ZAsVqT60+MbepR87ehYDnLB7RMjZMjZhEZ4/drafFbOQBmqL7YJjgbFsbBBXLTt COf/1mjiz7TptUvSUyDRc27o1K+YP1UoswsVdXT37sWkP9gtHtQFeLLNx8ZuR4pa 2yQ7xNIBi7KPNBjz9Q0RKYvc11oGVUvFSuD0gLgNuHZxdOmBWwZyHeSce9adHHGU 5t4Oz0FsTZuEiiuJXPTDatp06KQQpUZ/c7FgcO7bxIpn/NNUCZGKZdKT/ZYM1waf BEtBL2Ov+DzRnvRM3/lVPdaiMD1IY54bqTeU7NOiKCEFhBl0elCAblj155tVaKdR 5WekiCEsvB8S4FE6stDa+GewpBWUZiVLGSL49S0MViPqAbkbgcjcNlRVg6IEH2Zo tyQIl6/9DwdY1TCllA9W =Z1W8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

3 7

New Wine patches
by Chakke, Neha (GE Oil & Gas) 02 Jun '14

02 Jun '14

Hello , I am trying to run a GE software and hardware on Debian (Linux platform) using WineHQ. In order to run the hardware we need to install device drivers for USB (Cypress) . http://wiki.winehq.org/USB I have been trying to look for some solutions online since a week. Could you kindly send me the new wine patches and please guide me with the procedure. Thanks and regards, Miss Neha Chakke Engineering/Technology GE Oil & Gas Measurement & Control T: +49 (0) 2233 601 123 neha.chakke(a)ge.com<mailto:neha.chakke(a)ge.com> www.ge-mcs.com<http://www.ge-mcs.com/> [NewMeatball] GE Sensing & Inspection Technologies GmbH Robert-Bosch-Str. 3 50354 Hürth Germany

3 2

Re: ntdll: Use lockfree implementation for get_cached_fd. (try 2)
by Ken Thomases 01 Jun '14

01 Jun '14

On May 31, 2014, at 12:05 PM, Sebastian Lackner wrote: > Changes in try 2: > > * Always try to access the fd cache two times - this ensures that we > don't release a file descriptor when its still in use by a second thread. Heh. Well, you can ignore that part of my reply to your previous try. :) > * Replace interlocked_xchg() with an assert(). The original code looks > like its valid that the fd is nonzero at this point, but in fact this > would cause releasing a file descriptor which is still in use. I'll leave it to others to comment on that. > Replacing with an assert() also saves a couple of CPU cycles. I understand that this is an attempt to improve performance, but I don't think it's necessary to squeeze every last CPU cycle out of this code. -Ken

2 1

Re: ntdll/tests: Fix exception test failures on x86_64.
by Marvin 31 May '14

31 May '14

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=7354 Your paranoid android. === w2000pro (32 bit exception) === exception.c:406: Test failed: 42: Wrong exception address 00950000/00950001 exception: unhandled exception 80000004 at 00950000 exception.c:406: Test failed: 42: Wrong exception address 7C5C20B0/00950001 === wxppro (32 bit exception) === exception.c:406: Test failed: 42: Wrong exception address 00A30000/00A30001 exception: unhandled exception 80000004 at 00A30000 exception.c:406: Test failed: 42: Wrong exception address 7C80DF3C/00A30001 === wvistau64 (32 bit exception) === exception.c:406: Test failed: 42: Wrong exception address 003D0000/003D0001 exception: unhandled exception 80000004 at 003D0000 exception.c:406: Test failed: 42: Wrong exception address 7751ED97/003D0001 === w2008s64 (32 bit exception) === exception.c:406: Test failed: 42: Wrong exception address 003C0000/003C0001 exception: unhandled exception 80000004 at 003C0000 exception.c:406: Test failed: 42: Wrong exception address 77E5ED97/003C0001 === w7u (32 bit exception) === exception.c:406: Test failed: 42: Wrong exception address 003C0000/003C0001 exception: unhandled exception 80000004 at 003C0000 exception.c:406: Test failed: 42: Wrong exception address 77CDE34F/003C0001 === w8 (32 bit exception) === exception.c:406: Test failed: 42: Wrong exception address 00290000/00290001 exception: unhandled exception 80000004 at 00290000 exception.c:406: Test failed: 42: Wrong exception address 77174D17/00290001

1 0

Re: dmscript/tests: Test some IPersistStream methods of DMScriptTrack.
by Marvin 30 May '14

30 May '14

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=7339 Your paranoid android. === build (build) === Patch failed to apply

2 1