July 2022 - Wine-devel - list.winehq.org

Re: [PATCH v8 2/7] ntoskrnl/tests: Add test for getting SPDRP_BASE_CONTAINERID from PnP driver
by Marvin 14 Jul '22

14 Jul '22

Hi, It looks like your patch introduced the new failures shown below. Please investigate and fix them before resubmitting your patch. If they are not new, fixing them anyway would help a lot. Otherwise please ask for the known failures list to be updated. The tests also ran into some preexisting test failures. If you know how to fix them that would be helpful. See the TestBot job for the details: The full results can be found at: https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=118934 Your paranoid android. === debian11 (32 bit Hindi:India report) === ntoskrnl.exe: driver_pnp.c:706: Test failed: Got 1 remove events.

1 0

Re: [PATCH v7 7/7] ntoskrnl: Set device ContainerID from driver
by Marvin 14 Jul '22

14 Jul '22

Hi, It looks like your patch introduced the new failures shown below. Please investigate and fix them before resubmitting your patch. If they are not new, fixing them anyway would help a lot. Otherwise please ask for the known failures list to be updated. The full results can be found at: https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=118932 Your paranoid android. === w7u_2qxl (32 bit report) === ntoskrnl.exe: ntoskrnl.c:1655: Test failed: got size 78 === w7u_el (32 bit report) === ntoskrnl.exe: ntoskrnl.c:1655: Test failed: got size 78 === w8 (32 bit report) === ntoskrnl.exe: ntoskrnl.c:1655: Test failed: got size 78 === w1064_tsign (64 bit report) === ntoskrnl.exe: ntoskrnl.c:1655: Test failed: got size 78 === debian11 (32 bit report) === ntoskrnl.exe: ntoskrnl.c:1655: Test failed: got size 39 driver_pnp.c:706: Test failed: Got 1 remove events. === debian11 (32 bit Arabic:Morocco report) === ntoskrnl.exe: ntoskrnl.c:1655: Test failed: got size 39 === debian11 (32 bit German report) === ntoskrnl.exe: ntoskrnl.c:1655: Test failed: got size 39 === debian11 (32 bit French report) === ntoskrnl.exe: ntoskrnl.c:1655: Test failed: got size 39 driver_pnp.c:706: Test failed: Got 1 remove events. === debian11 (32 bit Hebrew:Israel report) === ntoskrnl.exe: ntoskrnl.c:1655: Test failed: got size 39 === debian11 (32 bit Hindi:India report) === ntoskrnl.exe: ntoskrnl.c:1655: Test failed: got size 39 === debian11 (32 bit Japanese:Japan report) === ntoskrnl.exe: ntoskrnl.c:1655: Test failed: got size 39 === debian11 (32 bit Chinese:China report) === ntoskrnl.exe: ntoskrnl.c:1655: Test failed: got size 39 === debian11 (64 bit WoW report) === ntoskrnl.exe: ntoskrnl.c:1655: Test failed: got size 39

1 0

Re: [PATCH v7 2/7] ntoskrnl/tests: Add test for getting SPDRP_BASE_CONTAINERID from PnP driver
by Marvin 14 Jul '22

14 Jul '22

Hi, It looks like your patch introduced the new failures shown below. Please investigate and fix them before resubmitting your patch. If they are not new, fixing them anyway would help a lot. Otherwise please ask for the known failures list to be updated. The full results can be found at: https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=118927 Your paranoid android. === debian11 (32 bit French report) === ntoskrnl.exe: driver_pnp.c:736: Test failed: expected IRP_MN_REMOVE_DEVICE === debian11 (32 bit Hebrew:Israel report) === ntoskrnl.exe: driver_pnp.c:706: Test failed: Got 1 remove events. === debian11 (32 bit Hindi:India report) === ntoskrnl.exe: driver_pnp.c:706: Test failed: Got 1 remove events.

1 0

Re: [PATCH v4 4/5] mshtml: Implement overrideMimeType for XMLHttpRequest.
by Marvin 14 Jul '22

14 Jul '22

Hi, It looks like your patch introduced the new failures shown below. Please investigate and fix them before resubmitting your patch. If they are not new, fixing them anyway would help a lot. Otherwise please ask for the known failures list to be updated. The tests also ran into some preexisting test failures. If you know how to fix them that would be helpful. See the TestBot job for the details: The full results can be found at: https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=118924 Your paranoid android. === w7u_adm (32 bit report) === mshtml: script.c:644: Test failed: L"/index.html?es5.js:date_now: unexpected Date.now() result 1657738156862 expected 1657738156925"

1 0

Re: [PATCH 1/1] win32u: Send WM_NCPAINT as notify message in send_ncpaint().
by Marvin 14 Jul '22

14 Jul '22

Hi, It looks like your patch introduced the new failures shown below. Please investigate and fix them before resubmitting your patch. If they are not new, fixing them anyway would help a lot. Otherwise please ask for the known failures list to be updated. The full results can be found at: https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=118970 Your paranoid android. === w1064_2qxl (64 bit report) === user32: win.c:4579: Test failed: hwnd 000000000001024C/000000000001024C message 0200 win.c:4583: Test failed: hwnd 000000000001024C/000000000001024C message 0201 win.c:4592: Test failed: hwnd 00000000001002B8/00000000001002B8 message 0202 win.c:4595: Test failed: hwnd 00000000001002B8/00000000001002B8 message 0201

1 0

Re: [PATCH v4 3/5] mshtml: Check for valid XML Content-Type for responseXML in IE10+ modes.
by Marvin 14 Jul '22

14 Jul '22

Hi, It looks like your patch introduced the new failures shown below. Please investigate and fix them before resubmitting your patch. If they are not new, fixing them anyway would help a lot. Otherwise please ask for the known failures list to be updated. The tests also ran into some preexisting test failures. If you know how to fix them that would be helpful. See the TestBot job for the details: The full results can be found at: https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=118923 Your paranoid android. === w10pro64 (64 bit report) === mshtml: htmldoc.c:2541: Test failed: unexpected call UpdateUI htmldoc.c:2853: Test failed: unexpected call Exec_UPDATECOMMANDS htmldoc.c:350: Test failed: expected Exec_SETTITLE htmldoc.c:2859: Test failed: unexpected call Exec_SETTITLE

1 0

Re: [PATCH v4 2/5] mshtml: Respect LOAD_CALL_CONTENT_SNIFFERS when using detected mime type.
by Marvin 13 Jul '22

13 Jul '22

Hi, It looks like your patch introduced the new failures shown below. Please investigate and fix them before resubmitting your patch. If they are not new, fixing them anyway would help a lot. Otherwise please ask for the known failures list to be updated. The tests also ran into some preexisting test failures. If you know how to fix them that would be helpful. See the TestBot job for the details: The full results can be found at: https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=118922 Your paranoid android. === w10pro64_ar (64 bit report) === mshtml: htmldoc.c:2541: Test failed: unexpected call UpdateUI htmldoc.c:2853: Test failed: unexpected call Exec_UPDATECOMMANDS htmldoc.c:350: Test failed: expected Exec_SETTITLE htmldoc.c:2859: Test failed: unexpected call Exec_SETTITLE

1 0

Re: [PATCH v3 4/5] mshtml: Implement overrideMimeType for XMLHttpRequest.
by Marvin 13 Jul '22

13 Jul '22

Hi, It looks like your patch introduced the new failures shown below. Please investigate and fix them before resubmitting your patch. If they are not new, fixing them anyway would help a lot. Otherwise please ask for the known failures list to be updated. The tests also ran into some preexisting test failures. If you know how to fix them that would be helpful. See the TestBot job for the details: The full results can be found at: https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=118919 Your paranoid android. === w10pro64_ja (64 bit report) === mshtml: htmldoc.c:2541: Test failed: unexpected call UpdateUI htmldoc.c:2853: Test failed: unexpected call Exec_UPDATECOMMANDS htmldoc.c:350: Test failed: expected Exec_SETTITLE htmldoc.c:2859: Test failed: unexpected call Exec_SETTITLE === w10pro64_zh_CN (64 bit report) === mshtml: htmldoc.c:2541: Test failed: unexpected call UpdateUI htmldoc.c:2853: Test failed: unexpected call Exec_UPDATECOMMANDS htmldoc.c:350: Test failed: expected Exec_SETTITLE htmldoc.c:2859: Test failed: unexpected call Exec_SETTITLE === w7u_adm (32 bit report) === mshtml: script.c:644: Test failed: L"/index.html?es5.js:date_now: unexpected Date.now() result 1657734051954 expected 1657734052016"

1 0

[PATCH 1/5] msvcr120/tests: Add missing newlines to messages.
by Torge Matthies 13 Jul '22

13 Jul '22

Signed-off-by: Torge Matthies <tmatthies(a)codeweavers.com> --- dlls/msvcr120/tests/msvcr120.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/dlls/msvcr120/tests/msvcr120.c b/dlls/msvcr120/tests/msvcr120.c index 88a32b382ef..ac35076af03 100644 --- a/dlls/msvcr120/tests/msvcr120.c +++ b/dlls/msvcr120/tests/msvcr120.c @@ -1375,7 +1375,7 @@ static void __cdecl chore_proc(_UnrealizedChore *_this) MSVCRT_bool canceling = call_func1( p__StructuredTaskCollection__IsCanceling, chore->chore.task_collection); - ok(!canceling, "Task is already canceling"); + ok(!canceling, "Task is already canceling\n"); } if (!chore->wait_event) @@ -1399,7 +1399,7 @@ static void __cdecl chore_proc(_UnrealizedChore *_this) MSVCRT_bool canceling = call_func1( p__StructuredTaskCollection__IsCanceling, chore->chore.task_collection); - ok(canceling, "Task is not canceling"); + ok(canceling, "Task is not canceling\n"); } } -- 2.37.0

3 9

Building with MSVC
by Gisle Vanem 13 Jul '22

13 Jul '22

Hello list. My first post here. First off, I'm not using Linux and does not want to. I'm on Win-10 and would (just for fun) try to build e.g. Wine's 'explorer.exe' and other tool using MSVC-2022 and/or clang-cl v.13. I see that the sources are full of '_MSC_VER' and assume it would be possible. I've built all 'tools/' program just fine with a set of home-brewed GNU-makefiles. But have some problems with missing symbols during link. For example these: _NtUserMessageCall(a)28 _DrawCaptionTempW(a)28 MSDN came up blank for these. But I see that 'NtUserMessageCall(a)28' is exported from my normal 'win32u.dll' on Win-10. But there's no entry for them in any Win-Kit library AFAICS. So are we supposed to use Wine's 'win32u.dll' as a trampoline to the real and undocumented functions? Then there is 'DrawCaptionTempW'. I find no prototype for it in the Win-Kit SDK. But I find it in TDM-MinGW's 'libuser32.a'. Ref: https://gist.github.com/wbenny/123a41973af776df9c7d5610586b9e9d I've read the FAQ so I'm not sure my effort is supported at all. Or if some MinGW-distro is required. -- --gv

2 2