11 Apr
2013
11 Apr
'13
12:11 p.m.
Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org> wrote:
The standard test code should be kept as simple as possible. Also creating extra mappings can potentially influence other tests.
I still think that this code can be used on a general base, and if needed mapping name could be made more unlikely to dulicate. Especially since it's already written and tested quite a bit.
In your parent process you can use whatever mechanism you want to report failures, you don't have to use the child exit code.
If you mean avoiding to use winetest_wait_child_process() then yes, I can certainly do that. -- Dmitry.