18 Mar
2013
18 Mar
'13
6:06 p.m.
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 9:13 PM, C.W. Betts <computers57(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
A quick glance at the source revealed that you removed static from some functions. Why? If a function isn't being called outside a source file, it's better to have it be static. This includes functions referenced in structs (but not the structs themselves).
Hi, I believe I only removed static where it was needed. Utility functions are kept in winemenubuilder.c, and some of them are referenced from xdg.c and/or appbundler.c. Thus static was removed from those. Regards, -- Per Johansson