28 Mar
2013
28 Mar
'13
5:40 a.m.
On Mar 28, 2013, at 2:26 AM, Per Johansson wrote:
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 7:22 PM, Ken Thomases <ken(a)codeweavers.com> wrote:
---
This has probably been discussed before, but shouldn't snprintfW be safe against this kind of thing, the way POSIX snprintf is?
I actually checked the man page for snprintf() when I originally wrote that code, which is why I assumed snprintfW() would terminate it. So, my vote is for "yes". :) -Ken